Parallel processing blocked by letter similarity in letter by letter dyslexia: A replication

An investigation of the joint effects of orthographic neighbourhood size (N size) and of letter confusability in three letter-by-letter (LBL) dyslexics is reported. All three patients showed a facilitatory effect of increased N size with low letter-confusability words, but no N size effect with high confusability words. This exactly replicates previous observations by Arguin, Fiset, and Bub (2002) in another LBL dyslexic. A facilitatory N size effect requires parallel letter processing and the word recognition performance of normal readers is unaffected by letter confusability. The present findings therefore signal that the residual capacity for parallel letter processing in LBL dyslexia is blocked by letter similarity. This implies a deficit of letter encoding or identification, which appears to be a general feature of LBL dyslexia since it is exhibited by all of the four patients so tested.

[1]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[2]  A. V. D. Heijden,et al.  Anempirical interletter confusionmatrix for continuous-line capitals , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  J. Townsend.  Serial vs. Parallel Processing: Sometimes They Look like Tweedledum and Tweedledee but they can (and Should) be Distinguished , 1990 .

[4]  Martin Arguin,et al.  EXTENT AND LIMITS OF COVERT LEXICAL ACTIVATION IN LETTER-BY-LETTER READING. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[5]  H. Coslett,et al.  IMPLICIT VS. LETTER-BY-LETTER READING IN PURE ALEXIA: A TALE OF TWO SYSTEMS. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[6]  Yasushi Hino,et al.  Neighborhood Size and Neighborhood Frequency Effects in Word Recognition , 1995 .

[7]  J G Snodgrass,et al.  Neighborhood effects in visual word recognition: Facilitatory or inhibitory? , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[8]  K. Mullen,et al.  Analysis of errors in color agnosia: A single-case study , 1999 .

[9]  H. Coslett,et al.  Evidence for preserved reading in 'pure alexia'. , 1989, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[10]  Mozer,et al.  Early parallel processing in reading: a connectionist approach. Technical report, April-November 1986 , 1986 .

[11]  K I Forster,et al.  No enemies in the neighborhood: absence of inhibitory neighborhood effects in lexical decision and semantic categorization. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  D. Plaut,et al.  A LITERATURE REVIEW AND NEW DATA SUPPORTING AN INTERACTIVE ACCOUNT OF LETTER-BY-LETTER READING. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[13]  Marlene Behrmann,et al.  Localization in alexia. , 1994 .

[14]  Yasushi Hino,et al.  Orthographic neighbourhood effects in parallel distributed processing models. , 1999 .

[15]  D. Bub,et al.  Pure Alexia: Attempted Rehabilitation and Its Implications for Interpretation of the Deficit , 1994, Brain and Language.

[16]  S. Andrews.  The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts , 1997 .

[17]  D. Bub,et al.  Lexical Constraints on Reading Accuracy in Neglect Dyslexia , 1997 .

[18]  J. Grainger,et al.  Effects of orthographic neighborhood in visual word recognition: cross-task comparisons. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  Martin Arguin,et al.  Sequential and parallel letter processing in letter-by-letter dyslexia , 2002, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[20]  K. Forster,et al.  Lexical Access and Naming Time. , 1973 .

[21]  D. Bub,et al.  Visual Word Activation in Pure Alexia , 1995, Brain and Language.

[22]  L. Katz,et al.  Neighborhood effects in visual word recognition: effects of letter delay and nonword context difficulty. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[23]  Daniel Fiset,et al.  The breakdown of parallel letter processing in letter-by-letter dyslexia , 2006, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[24]  Michael J. Cosky,et al.  The role of letter recognition in word recognition , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[25]  S. Andrews.  Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? , 1989 .

[26]  N. F. Johnson,et al.  A Cohort Model of Visual Word Recognition , 1994, Cognitive Psychology.

[27]  Anne Hesketh,et al.  Implicit recognition in pure alexia: The Saffran effect—a tale of two systems or two procedures? , 2004, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[28]  Max Coltheart,et al.  Access to the internal lexicon , 1977 .

[29]  M. Montant,et al.  Phonological Activation in Pure Alexia , 2001, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[30]  T Shallice,et al.  Word-form dyslexia. , 1980, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[31]  A. Damasio,et al.  The anatomic basis of pure alexia , 1983, Neurology.

[32]  G C Gilmore,et al.  Multidimensional letter similarity derived from recognition errors , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[33]  D. Bub,et al.  Single-character processing in a case of pure alexia , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[34]  J. Townsend.  Theoretical analysis of an alphabetic confusion matrix , 1971 .

[35]  R. Burchfield.  Frequency Analysis of English Usage: Lexicon and Grammar. By W. Nelson Francis and Henry Kučera with the assistance of Andrew W. Mackie. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 1982. x + 561 , 1985 .

[36]  John R. Hodges,et al.  Localization and Neuroimaging in Neuropsychology , 1995 .

[37]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. , 1982, Psychological review.

[38]  J M Loomis,et al.  Analysis of tactile and visual confusion matrices , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[39]  K Patterson,et al.  Letter-by-letter reading: psychological descriptions of a neurological syndrome. , 1995, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[40]  Jeffrey S. Bowers,et al.  Fast and Specific Access to Orthographic Knowledge in a Case of Letter-by-letter Surface Alexia , 1996 .