Communicative Function Demonstration induces kind-based artifact representation in preverbal infants

Human infants grow up in environments populated by artifacts. In order to acquire knowledge about different kinds of human-made objects, children have to be able to focus on the information that is most relevant for sorting artifacts into categories. Traditional theories emphasize the role of superficial, perceptual features in object categorization. In the case of artifacts, however, it is possible that abstract, non-obvious properties, like functions, may form the basis of artifact kind representations from an early age. Using an object individuation paradigm we addressed the question whether non-verbal communicative demonstration of the functional use of artifacts makes young infants represent such objects in terms of their kinds. When two different functions were sequentially demonstrated on two novel objects as they emerged one-by-one from behind a screen, 10-month-old infants inferred the presence of two objects behind the occluder. We further show that both the presence of communicative signals and causal intervention are necessary for 10-month-olds to generate such a numerical expectation. We also found that communicative demonstration of two different functions of a single artifact generated the illusion of the presence of two objects. This suggests that information on artifact function was used as an indicator of kind membership, and infants expected one specific function to define one specific artifact kind. Thus, contrary to previous accounts, preverbal infants' specific sensitivity to object function underlies, guides, and supports their learning about artifacts.

[1]  Fei Xu,et al.  Labeling Guides Object Individuation in 12-Month-Old Infants , 2005, Psychological science.

[2]  K. Jellinger Processes of Change in Brain and Cognitive Development Attention and Performance XXI , 2007 .

[3]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Processes of change in brain and cognitive development , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[4]  T. Wilcox,et al.  Priming infants to attend to color and pattern information in an individuation task , 2004, Cognition.

[5]  Fei Xu The role of language in acquiring object kind concepts in infancy , 2002, Cognition.

[6]  Fei Xu Categories , Kinds , and Object Individuation in Infancy , 2006 .

[7]  G. Csibra,et al.  Social learning and social cognition: The case for pedagogy , 2006 .

[8]  D. Kahneman Changing views of attention and automacy , 1984 .

[9]  Fei Xu,et al.  Sortal concepts, object individuation, and language , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  Renate Zangl,et al.  The Human First Hypothesis: Identification of Conspecifics and Individuation of Objects in the Young Infant , 2002, Cognitive Psychology.

[11]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  Indexing and the object concept: developing `what' and `where' systems , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  Sabina Pauen,et al.  The role of functional information for infant categorization , 2007, Cognition.

[13]  K. Dewar,et al.  Do Early Nouns Refer to Kinds or Distinct Shapes? , 2009, Psychological science.

[14]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Varieties of attention , 1984 .

[15]  D. Gentner The development of relational category knowledge , 2005 .

[16]  Eric Margolis,et al.  Creations of the Mind: Theories of Artifacts and Their Representation , 2007 .

[17]  G. Csibra,et al.  Natural pedagogy , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[18]  G. Csibra,et al.  Gaze Following in Human Infants Depends on Communicative Signals , 2008, Current Biology.

[19]  Susan Carey,et al.  The essence of artifacts: Developing the design stance , 2007 .

[20]  R. Baillargeon,et al.  Object individuation in young infants: Further evidence with an event‐monitoring paradigm , 1998 .

[21]  S. Carey,et al.  The emergence of kind concepts: a rejoinder to Needham and Baillargeon (2000) , 2000, Cognition.

[22]  S. Carey,et al.  The emergence of kind-based object individuation in infancy , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.

[23]  S. Carey,et al.  Infants’ Metaphysics: The Case of Numerical Identity , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[24]  Patrice D. Tremoulet,et al.  Infant individuation and identification of objects , 2000 .

[25]  Zsuzsa Kaldy,et al.  Identification of objects in 9‐month‐old infants: integrating ‘what’ and ‘where’ information , 2003 .

[26]  L. Surian,et al.  Infants' individuation of agents and inert objects. , 2010, Developmental science.

[27]  D. Sperber,et al.  Relevance: Communication and Cognition , 1997 .

[28]  D. Sperber,et al.  Relevance: Communication and Cognition , 1989 .

[29]  Susan J. Hespos,et al.  Infants' Knowledge About Occlusion and Containment Events: A Surprising Discrepancy , 2001, Psychological science.

[30]  Gergely Csibra,et al.  Recognizing Communicative Intentions in Infancy , 2010 .

[31]  Gergely Csibra,et al.  Functional understanding facilitates learning about tools in human children , 2009, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.