Taking Ethics, Fairness, and Bias Seriously in Machine Learning for Disaster Risk Management

This paper highlights an important, if under-examined, set of questions about the deployment of machine learning technologies in the field of disaster risk management (DRM). While emerging tools show promising capacity to support scientific efforts to better understand and mitigate the threats posed by disasters and climate change, our field must undertake a much more careful assessment of the potential negative impacts that machine learning technologies may create. We also argue that attention to these issues in the context of machine learning affords the opportunity to have discussions about potential ethics, bias, and fairness concerns within disaster data more broadly. In what follows, we first describe some of the uses and potential benefits of machine-learning technology in disaster risk management. We then draw on research from other fields to speculate about potential negative impacts. Finally, we outline a research agenda for how our disaster risk management can begin to take these issues seriously and ensure that deployments of machine-learning tools are conducted in a responsible and beneficial manner.

[1]  K. Emanuel,et al.  Evaluating Flood Resilience Strategies for Coastal Megacities , 2014, Science.

[2]  Max Liboiron Disaster Data, Data Activism , 2015 .

[3]  Frans Klijn,et al.  Risky places in the Netherlands: a first approximation for floods , 2009 .

[4]  Leysia Palen,et al.  Informating Crisis , 2018, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..

[5]  J. Kind,et al.  Economically efficient flood protection standards for the Netherlands , 2014 .

[6]  K. D. Bruijn,et al.  Flood fatality hazard and flood damage hazard: combining multiple hazard characteristics into meaningful maps for spatial planning , 2015 .

[7]  H. Kunreuther,et al.  Catastrophe modeling : a new approach to managing risk , 2013 .

[8]  Robert Soden,et al.  Open data for resilience initiative : policy note and principles , 2016 .

[9]  Os Keyes,et al.  The Misgendering Machines , 2018, Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact..

[10]  W.P.S. Dias,et al.  Evaluating adaptation measures for reducing flood risk: A case study in the city of Colombo, Sri Lanka , 2019, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction.

[11]  Robert Soden,et al.  Infrastructuring the Imaginary: How Sea-Level Rise Comes to Matter in the San Francisco Bay Area , 2019, CHI.

[12]  B. Hurk,et al.  Forecast-based financing: an approach for catalyzing humanitarian action based on extreme weather and climate forecasts , 2014 .

[13]  Robert Soden,et al.  Machine Learning for Disaster Risk Management , 2019 .

[14]  K. Crawford,et al.  The limits of crisis data: analytical and ethical challenges of using social and mobile data to understand disasters , 2015 .

[15]  S. Noble Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism , 2018 .

[16]  Hannah Lebovits Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor , 2018, Public Integrity.