Pilot demonstration of the NH3/CO2 forward osmosis desalination process on high salinity brines

Abstract An NH3/CO2 forward osmosis (FO) membrane brine concentrator (MBC) pilot was tested in the desalination of frac flowback and produced waters from natural gas extraction operations in the Marcellus shale region. The average concentration of these waters was 73,000 ± 4200 mg/L total dissolved solids (TDS), with an average hardness of 17,000 ± 3000 mg/L as CaCO3. Pretreatment included chemical softening, media filtration, activated carbon, and cartridge filtration. Average pilot performance characteristics were: system recovery of 64 ± 2.2%, nominal water flux of 2.6 ± 0.12 L/m2-h, concentrated brine concentration of 180,000 ± 19,000 mg/L TDS, and product water with 300 ± 115 mg/L TDS. The thermal energy required by the FO MBC pilot, when operated within the efficient flow specification of the draw solution recycling system, averaged 275 ± 12 kWhth/m3 of product water, approximately 57% less thermal energy input than that estimated for a conventional evaporator operated in a comparable single stage, non-mechanical vapor compression (MVC) configuration. In an MVC configuration, which uses electrical rather than thermal energy, modeling indicates that the FO MBC process will require 42% less electrical energy than a conventional forced circulation MVC evaporator.

[1]  Raphael Semiat,et al.  Energy issues in desalination processes. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Energy requirements of ammonia-carbon dioxide forward osmosis desalination , 2007 .

[3]  Don W. Green,et al.  Perry's Chemical Engineers' Handbook , 2007 .

[4]  Amy E. Childress,et al.  Forward osmosis: Principles, applications, and recent developments , 2006 .

[5]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Reverse draw solute permeation in forward osmosis: modeling and experiments. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  Robert L McGinnis,et al.  Desalination by ammonia–carbon dioxide forward osmosis: Influence of draw and feed solution concentrations on process performance , 2006 .

[7]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Global challenges in energy and water supply: the promise of engineered osmosis. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  Kerri L. Hickenbottom,et al.  Forward osmosis treatment of drilling mud and fracturing wastewater from oil and gas operations , 2013 .

[9]  Hisham Ettouney,et al.  Developments in thermal desalination processes: Design, energy, and costing aspects , 2007 .

[10]  Andrea Achilli,et al.  Standard methodology for evaluating membrane performance in osmotically driven membrane processes , 2013 .

[11]  Joon Ha Kim,et al.  Mathematical model of flat sheet membrane modules for FO process: Plate-and-frame module and spiral- , 2011 .

[12]  Peter Harriott,et al.  Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering , 2004 .

[13]  Tzahi Y Cath,et al.  Bidirectional permeation of electrolytes in osmotically driven membrane processes. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  Linda Zou,et al.  Recent developments in forward osmosis : opportunities and challenges. , 2012 .

[15]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  A novel ammonia-carbon dioxide forward (direct) osmosis desalination process , 2005 .