Wake-based unsteady modeling of the aquatic beetle Dytiscus marginalis.

Dytiscus marginalis simultaneously uses its hind legs to propel itself through the water. Previous work has suggested that use of synchronized leg motions, such as that used by D. marginalis, allows it to swim with higher hydrodynamic efficiency than similarly sized insects that alternate their legs during swimming. A model is developed based on the generation of vortices in the wake to calculate the relative efficiency of synchronized-leg-swimming kinematics compared to alternating-leg-swimming kinematics. The model agrees well with measured values of swimming speeds during steady state and predicts an overall hydrodynamic swimming efficiency of 18% for synchronized-leg-swimming. Additionally, synchronized-leg swimming is calculated to be 39% more hydrodynamically efficient than alternating-leg-swimming kinematics, thus verifying previous suggestions of greater hydrodynamic efficiency in D. marginalis based on swimming observation.

[1]  G. Lauder,et al.  Hydrodynamics of surface swimming in leopard frogs (Rana pipiens) , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[2]  M. Gharib,et al.  Role of the tip vortex in the force generation of low-aspect-ratio normal flat plates , 2007, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[3]  J. G. Needham,et al.  Observations on the Natural History of Diving Beetles , 1907, The American Naturalist.

[4]  G. M. Hughes.  The Co-Ordination of Insect Movements , 1958 .

[5]  R. W. Blake,et al.  Biomechanics of Frog Swimming: II. Mechanics of the Limb-Beat Cycle in Hymenochirus Boettgeri , 1988 .

[6]  E. Achenbach,et al.  Vortex shedding from spheres , 1974, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[7]  E. Goretti,et al.  Oxygen consumption in two aquatic coleoptera species: Hydrous piceus and Dytiscus marginalis , 1999 .

[8]  Christopher E. Brennen,et al.  A Review of Added Mass and Fluid Inertial Forces , 1982 .

[9]  Daegyoum Kim.  Characteristics of three-dimensional vortex formation andpropulsive performance in flapping locomotion , 2010 .

[10]  Garth N. Foster,et al.  Functional types of diving beetle (Coleoptera: Hygrobiidae and Dytiscidae), as identified by comparative swimming behaviour , 1997 .

[11]  I. Aoki,et al.  Swimming behaviour and target strength of isada krill (Euphausia pacifica) , 1996 .

[12]  Origins of the frog-kick? Alternate-leg swimming in primitive frogs, families Leiopelmatidae and Ascaphidae , 1999 .

[13]  J. Mauchline,et al.  The biology of euphausiids , 1967 .

[14]  C. Richards.  Kinematics and hydrodynamics analysis of swimming anurans reveals striking inter-specific differences in the mechanism for producing thrust , 2010, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[15]  S. Alben,et al.  Coordination of multiple appendages in drag-based swimming , 2010, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[16]  P. Aerts,et al.  Two distinct gait types in swimming frogs , 2002 .

[17]  Louis Rosenhead,et al.  Laminar boundary layers , 1963 .

[18]  Koji Tsuyuki,et al.  Swimming behavior of small diving beetles , 2006 .

[19]  Hydrodynamics of the Body of Dytiscus Marginalis (Dytiscidae, Coleoptera) , 1975 .

[20]  C. Brennen,et al.  Swimming and Flying in Nature , 1975, Springer US.