Failure of the rabbit tibial growth plate to respond to the long‐term application of a capacitively‐coupled electrical field

A continuous 5‐V peak‐to‐peak, 60 kHz capacitively‐coupled sine wave signal was applied to the proximal tibial growth plate in fifteen 9‐week‐old male New Zealand white rabbits for 6 weeks. A pair of flexible stainless steel “injectrodes” was held in place medially and laterally on the surface of the proximal hindlimb in each rabbit by means of tape wrappings. The electrodes were connected to a 9‐V battery‐operated power unit carried in a dorsal pouch in a body vest worn by each rabbit. Control animals wore the identical apparatus, only the power unit was inactive. Small Tantalum markers were inserted into the anteromedial aspect of the proximal tibial metaphysis 1 cm distal to the proximal tibial growth plate in all of the animals, control and experimental, 2 weeks prior to the onset of electrical stimulation. The distance between the proximal lateral tibial spine and the Tantalum marker, between the Tantalum marker and the apex of the distal tibial intercondylar notch, and between the proximal tibial spine and the distal notch was measured from roentgenograms made at the time of bone marker insertion, at the time of electrode application to the limb, and at the end of the stimulation period. Results indicate that there was no significant difference in tibial lengths between the stimulated and control groups. There was significantly less total body weight gain in both the experimental and control animals than that which occurred in paired normal animals during the same period of time. This failure to thrive may be responsible for the resultant lack of longitudinal growth stimulation of the capacitive coupling. The observed failure to thrive was thought to be due to encumbrance imposed on the rabbits by the legwraps and the body vest.

[1]  S. Pollack,et al.  In vivo growth plate stimulation in various capacitively coupled electrical fields , 1984, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[2]  J. Taylor,et al.  The role of periosteal tension in the growth of long bones. , 1979, Journal of anatomy.

[3]  C. Brighton,et al.  In vitro epiphyseal-plate growth in various constant electrical fields. , 1976, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[4]  D. Jenkins,et al.  Stimulation of bone growth by periosteal stripping. A clinical study. , 1975, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[5]  K. Thorngren,et al.  Effect of venous stasis on longitudinal bone growth in the rabbit. , 1975, Acta orthopaedica Scandinavica.

[6]  L. Norton.  IN VIVO BONE GROWTH IN A CONTROLLED ELECTRIC FIELD * , 1974, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[7]  R. Winter,et al.  Arteriovenous fistula for treatment of discrepancy in leg length. , 1974, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  C. Wilson.  Experimental attempts to stimulate bone growth. , 1970, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  Chang Kp,et al.  8 Physiologic Leg Lengthening A Preliminary Report , 1970 .

[10]  W. Hoover,et al.  The effect of direct current on bone. , 1968, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  P. Kelly,et al.  THE EFFECT OF VENOUS STASIS ON INTRAOSSEOUS PRESSURE AND LONGITUDINAL BONE GROWTH IN THE DOG. , 1965, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  R. Cabrini,et al.  STIMULATION OF THE LONGITUDINAL GROWTH OF LONG BONES BY PERIOSTEAL STRIPPING. AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY ON DOGS AND MONKEYS. , 1963, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[13]  J. Colt,et al.  An Attempt To Stimulate Bone Growth By Creating a Venous Stenosis , 1963, Angiology.

[14]  E. B. Carpenter,et al.  A critical evaluation of a method of epiphyseal stimulation. , 1956, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[15]  J. R. Doyle,et al.  Stimulation of Bone Growth by Short-Wave Diathermy , 1963 .

[16]  W. N. Harsha.  Distracting effects placed across the epiphyses of long bones. A study in experimental animals. , 1962, JAMA.

[17]  H. Marsh,et al.  An experimental attempt to stimulate growth by a distracting force across the lower femoral epiphysis. , 1961, The American surgeon.

[18]  P. Ring.  THE INFLUENCE OF THE NERVOUS SYSTEM UPON THE GROWTH OF BONES , 1961 .

[19]  G. S. Tupman.  Treatment of inequality of the lower limbs. The results of operations for stimulation of growth. , 1960, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[20]  L. T. Ford,et al.  A study of experimental trauma and attempts to stimulate growth of the lower femoral epiphysis in rabbits. III. , 1960, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[21]  V. Richards,et al.  The stimulation of bone growth by internal heating. , 1959, Surgery.

[22]  P. Ring.  Experimental bone lengthening by epiphysial distraction , 1958, The British journal of surgery.

[23]  P. Ring,et al.  The effect of heat upon the growth of bone. , 1958, The Journal of pathology and bacteriology.

[24]  E. Percy,et al.  Experimental studies on epiphyseal stimulation. , 1956, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[25]  J. Reidy,et al.  Sympathetic ganglionectomy and limb length in poliomyelitis. , 1950, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[26]  J. Fahey.  THE EFFECT OF LUMBAR SYMPATHETIC GANGLIONECTOMY ON LONGITUDINAL BONE GROWTH AS DETERMINED BY THE TELEOROENTGENOGRAPHIC METHOD , 1936 .

[27]  J. Bisgard.  LONGITUDINAL BONE GROWTH: THE INFLUENCE OF SYMPATHETIC DEINNERVATION , 1933, Annals of surgery.

[28]  H. R. Bohlman.  EXPERIMENTS WITH FOREIGN MATERIALS IN THE REGION OF THE EPIPHYSEAL CARTILAGE PLATE OF GROWING BONES TO INCREASE THEIR LONGITUDINAL GROWTH , 1929 .

[29]  L. Ollier.  Traité expérimental et clinique de la régénération des os et de la production artificielle du tissu osseux , 1867 .