Magnetic field shift due to mechanical vibration in functional magnetic resonance imaging

Mechanical vibrations of the gradient coil system during readout in echo‐planar imaging (EPI) can increase the temperature of the gradient system and alter the magnetic field distribution during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). This effect is enhanced by resonant modes of vibrations and results in apparent motion along the phase encoding direction in fMRI studies. The magnetic field drift was quantified during EPI by monitoring the resonance frequency interleaved with the EPI acquisition, and a novel method is proposed to correct the apparent motion. The knowledge on the frequency drift over time was used to correct the phase of the k‐space EPI dataset. Since the resonance frequency changes very slowly over time, two measurements of the resonance frequency, immediately before and after the EPI acquisition, are sufficient to remove the field drift effects from fMRI time series. The frequency drift correction method was tested “in vivo” and compared to the standard image realignment method. The proposed method efficiently corrects spurious motion due to magnetic field drifts during fMRI. Magn Reson Med, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  C. Jack,et al.  Real‐time autoshimming for echo planar timecourse imaging , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  C K Mechefske,et al.  Gradient‐induced acoustic and magnetic field fluctuations in a 4T whole‐body MR imager , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  J. Hajnal,et al.  Artifacts due to stimulus correlated motion in functional imaging of the brain , 1994, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images , 2001, Medical Image Anal..

[5]  P. Van de Moortele,et al.  Field‐frequency locked in vivo proton MRS on a whole‐body spectrometer , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  M. Buonocore,et al.  Ghost artifact reduction for echo planar imaging using image phase correction , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  Centric ordering is superior to gradient moment nulling for motion artifact reduction in EPI , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[8]  N A Thacker,et al.  The effects of motion on parametric fMRI analysis techniques , 1999, Physiological measurement.

[9]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Movement‐Related effects in fMRI time‐series , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  G. Glover,et al.  Respiration‐induced B0 fluctuations and their spatial distribution in the human brain at 7 Tesla , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  W A Edelstein,et al.  Characterization and prediction of gradient acoustic noise in MR imagers , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  P. Jezzard,et al.  Sources of distortion in functional MRI data , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[13]  J L Lancaster,et al.  A B0 shift correction method based on edge RMS reduction for EPI fMRI , 2000, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[14]  Douglas C Noll,et al.  Dynamic field map estimation using a spiral‐in/spiral‐out acquisition , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  N C Andreasen,et al.  Functional MRI statistical software packages: A comparative analysis , 1998, Human brain mapping.

[16]  S J Riederer,et al.  Gradient moment smoothing: A new flow compensation technique for multi‐shot echo‐planar imaging , 1997, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  R W Cox,et al.  AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. , 1996, Computers and biomedical research, an international journal.

[18]  D. Tomasi,et al.  Echo planar imaging at 4 tesla with minimum acoustic noise , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[19]  L. Freire,et al.  Motion Correction Algorithms May Create Spurious Brain Activations in the Absence of Subject Motion , 2001, NeuroImage.

[20]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Automated image registration: I. General methods and intrasubject, intramodality validation. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[21]  O. Simonetti,et al.  Theoretical aspects of motion sensitivity and compensation in echo‐planar imaging , 1991, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[22]  D Le Bihan,et al.  Artifact due to B0 fluctuations in fMRI: Correction using the k‐space central line , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Spatial registration and normalization of images , 1995 .