Validating the coevolutionary principles of business and IS alignment via agent-based modeling

ABSTRACT This paper provides theoretical and practical implications for the application of agent-based models (ABMs) to address the issue of coevolutionary business-IS alignment. The implications stem from the following arguments: (a) the alignment issue can be modelled by an ABM to describe the features of complex adaptive systems (CAS); (b) the coevolutionary principles of business and IS alignment stipulate individual behaviours and guide organisational order; (c) ABM development and experimentation offer guidance to better explain how organisations control the alignment trajectory with coevolutionary principles. To extend the extant coevolutionary research on alignment, this paper develops an ABM for a hierarchical organisational structure and validates three coevolutionary principles.

[1]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Principles of Organizational Co-Evolution of Business and IT: a Complexity Perspective , 2019, ECIS.

[2]  Mengmeng Zhang.  A Coevolutionary Perspective on Business and IT Alignment : A Review and Research Agenda , 2018 .

[3]  Yajiong Xue,et al.  Unraveling the Alignment Paradox: How Does Business - IT Alignment Shape Organizational Agility? , 2017, Inf. Syst. Res..

[4]  Ning Nan,et al.  Unifying the Role of IT in Hyperturbulence and Competitive Advantage Via a Multilevel Perspective of IS Strategy , 2017, MIS Q..

[5]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Enhancing the measurement of information technology (IT) business alignment and its influence on company performance , 2017, J. Inf. Technol..

[6]  Hüseyin Tanriverdi,et al.  How to Survive and Thrive in Complex, Hypercompetitive, and Disruptive ecosystems? The Roles of IS-enabled Capabilities , 2017, ICIS.

[7]  Bart van den Hooff,et al.  An Explanatory Study on the Co-evolutionary Mechanisms of Business IT Alignment , 2017, ICIS.

[8]  Erwin Fielt,et al.  Towards a Complex Adaptive Systems Roadmap for Information Systems Research , 2017, PACIS.

[9]  Ernst C. Osinga,et al.  Big Data and Data Science Methods for Management Research , 2016 .

[10]  Bendik Bygstad,et al.  Identifying generative mechanisms through affordances: a framework for critical realist data analysis , 2016, J. Inf. Technol..

[11]  John Campbell,et al.  "Iterate wildly": is User-Centred Design and Prototyping the Key to Strategic Alignment? , 2016, ECIS.

[12]  Bart van den Hooff,et al.  Business IT Alignment through the Lens of Complexity Science , 2016, ICIS.

[13]  Harminder Singh,et al.  The Roots of Misalignment: Insights from a System Dynamics Perspective , 2015 .

[14]  Jason Bennett Thatcher,et al.  Six types of IT-business strategic alignment: an investigation of the constructs and their measurement , 2015, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[15]  Steven De Haes,et al.  Enterprise Governance of Information Technology: Achieving Alignment and Value, Featuring COBIT 5 , 2015 .

[16]  Madjid Tavana,et al.  CO-EVOLUTION PATH MODEL (CePM): SUSTAINING ENTERPRISES AS COMPLEX SYSTEMS ON THE EDGE OF CHAOS , 2014, Cybern. Syst..

[17]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  On the Coevolution of Stereotype, Culture, and Social Relationships , 2014 .

[18]  D. Teece.  The Foundations of Enterprise Performance: Dynamic and Ordinary Capabilities in an (Economic) Theory of Firms , 2014 .

[19]  Heinz-Theo Wagner,et al.  Evolvement of Business-IT Alignment over Time: A Situated Change Perspective , 2014, 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[20]  D. Ori,et al.  MISALIGNMENT SYMPTOM ANALYSIS BASED ON ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTURE MODEL ASSESSMENT , 2014 .

[21]  A. Gawer,et al.  Industry Platforms and Ecosystem Innovation , 2013 .

[22]  Iris Vessey,et al.  The Dynamics of Sustainable IS Alignment: The Case for IS Adaptivity , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Organizing for Innovation in the Digitized World , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[24]  Thanos Papadopoulos,et al.  Information systems strategy: Past, present, future? , 2012, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[25]  Frantz Rowe,et al.  Strategizing information systems-enabled organizational transformation: A transdisciplinary review and new directions , 2012, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[26]  Heinz-Theo Wagner,et al.  Reconsidering the Dimensions of Business-IT Alignment , 2012, 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[27]  Tim Weitzel,et al.  How to Achieve Operational Business-IT Alignment: Insights from a Global Aerospace Firm , 2012, MIS Q. Executive.

[28]  Guido Fioretti,et al.  Agent-Based Simulation Models in Organization Science , 2011 .

[29]  Paul P. Tallon,et al.  Competing Perspectives on the Link Between Strategic Information Technology Alignment and Organizational Agility: Insights from a Mediation Model , 2011, MIS Q..

[30]  Arun Rai,et al.  Research Commentary - Reframing the Dominant Quests of Information Systems Strategy Research for Complex Adaptive Business Systems , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[31]  P. Hedström,et al.  Causal Mechanisms in the Social Sciences , 2010 .

[32]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  Research Commentary - Seeking the Configurations of Digital Ecodynamics: It Takes Three to Tango , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[33]  Frank Robert,et al.  IS Alignment Improved with Co-Evolutionary Principles: An Open Source Approach , 2010, 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[34]  D. Teece.  Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management: Organizing for Innovation and Growth , 2009 .

[35]  A. S. Getchell,et al.  Agent-based Modeling , 2008 .

[36]  Pedro Sousa,et al.  Business and Information Systems MisAlignment Model (BISMAM): an Holistic Model Leveraged on Misalig , 2008 .

[37]  Blaize Horner Reich,et al.  IT alignment: what have we learned? , 2007, J. Inf. Technol..

[38]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  Different knowledge, different benefits: toward a productivity perspective on knowledge sharing in organizations , 2007 .

[39]  Peter M. Allen,et al.  A co-evolutionary complex systems perspective on information systems , 2006, J. Inf. Technol..

[40]  Hind Benbya,et al.  Using coevolutionary and complexity theories to improve IS alignment: a multi-level approach , 2006, J. Inf. Technol..

[41]  Richard T. Vidgen,et al.  From business process management to business process ecosystem , 2006, J. Inf. Technol..

[42]  P. Bordia,et al.  Differences in sharing knowledge interpersonally and via databases: The role of evaluation apprehension and perceived benefits , 2006 .

[43]  Hind Benbya,et al.  Toward a complexity theory of information systems development , 2006, Inf. Technol. People.

[44]  Brian F. Tivnan,et al.  Coevolutionary dynamics and agent-based models in organization science , 2005, Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, 2005..

[45]  Rick Kazman,et al.  BITAM: An engineering-principled method for managing misalignments between business and IT architectures , 2005, Sci. Comput. Program..

[46]  David E. Avison,et al.  Using and validating the strategic alignment model , 2004, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[47]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[48]  Grover S. Kearns,et al.  A Resource-Based View of Strategic IT Alignment: How Knowledge Sharing Creates Competitive Advantage , 2003, Decis. Sci..

[49]  Joe Peppard,et al.  Beyond Alignment: A Coevolutionary View of the Information Systems Strategy Process , 2003 .

[50]  Angel Cabrera,et al.  Knowledge-Sharing Dilemmas , 2002 .

[51]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  The Dynamics of Alignment: Insights from a Punctuated Equilibrium Model , 2001 .

[52]  Dubravka Cecez-Kecmanovic,et al.  AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) , 2022 .

[53]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Factors That Influence the Social Dimension of Alignment Between Business and Information Technology Objectives , 2000, MIS Q..

[54]  E. Mitleton-Kelly,et al.  Co-Evolution and an Enabling Infrastructure: A Solution to Legacy? , 2000 .

[55]  E. Mitleton-Kelly,et al.  Systems Engineering for Business Process Change , 2000, Springer London.

[56]  M. Mazumdar,et al.  Avoiding Complexity Catastrophe in Coevolutionary Pockets: Strategies for Rugged Landscapes , 1999 .

[57]  C. Ciborra,et al.  Groupware and Teamwork in R&D: Limits to Learning and Innovation , 1998 .

[58]  Georges Haour.  The global village of innovation and R&D management: an introduction to this single‐topic issue , 1998 .

[59]  Arantxa Etxeverria.  The Origins of Order , 1993 .

[60]  John R. Koza,et al.  Hidden Order: How Adaptation Builds Complexity. , 1995, Artificial Life.

[61]  John C. Henderson,et al.  Strategic Alignment: Leveraging Information Technology for Transforming Organizations , 1993, IBM Syst. J..

[62]  F. Rombouts,et al.  Modeling of the Bacterial Growth Curve , 1990, Applied and environmental microbiology.