The Reconciliation of Humanism and Positivism in the Practice of Consumer Research: A View from the Trenches

Consumer researchers commonly assert that humanism differs from positivism (what is referred to here as naturalism) on a number of dimensions. However, it is shown here that once terminological differences and methodological similarities are recognized, the remaining differences between humanism and naturalism within consumer research are few. While arguments persist at the philosophical extremes, it appears that practicing researchers have achieved considerable reconciliation.

[1]  A. Greenwald,et al.  Under what conditions does theory obstruct research progress? , 1986, Psychological review.

[2]  N. Denzin.  The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods , 1977 .

[3]  S. Nachman.  Lies My Informants Told Me , 1984, Journal of Anthropological Research.

[4]  J. J. F. Sherry.  A Sociocultural Analysis of a Midwestern American Flea Market , 1990 .

[5]  Joel B. Cohen.  An Over-Extended Self? , 1989 .

[6]  Erwin K. Welsch.  A Closer Look at…: Accessing Information through Networks , 1991 .

[7]  Allan Franklin,et al.  Experiment, right or wrong , 1990 .

[8]  E. Hirschman.  Humanistic Inquiry in Marketing Research: Philosophy, Method, and Criteria , 1986 .

[9]  P. Feyerabend.  PUTNAM ON INCOMMENSURABILITY , 1987, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.

[10]  Julie L. Ozanne,et al.  Exploring Diversity in Consumer Research , 1989 .

[11]  R. Rist.  ON THE RELATIONS AMONG EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH PARADIGMS: FROM DISDAIN TO DETENTE' , 1977 .

[12]  Julie L. Ozanne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Seeking Knowledge in Consumer Research , 1988 .

[13]  A. Rosenberg.  Philosophy of Social Science , 2018 .

[14]  R. Belk,et al.  Assessing Trustworthiness in Naturalistic Consumer Research , 1989 .

[15]  D. Aaker,et al.  Is Market Share all that It's Cracked up to Be? , 1985 .

[16]  Thomas J. Madden,et al.  A Closer Look at Classical Conditioning , 1985 .

[17]  Michael D. Johnson.  Comparability and Hierarchical Processing in Multialternative Choice , 1988 .

[18]  Alice M. Tybout,et al.  Interpretive, Qualitative, and Traditional Scientific Empirical Consumer Behavior Research , 1989 .

[19]  Peter Wright.  Message-Evoked Thoughts: Persuasion Research Using Thought Verbalizations , 1980 .

[20]  P. F. Anderson.  On Method in Consumer Research: A Critical Relativist Perspective , 1986 .

[21]  Elizabeth F. Loftus,et al.  Eyewitness testimony: The influence of the wording of a question , 1975 .

[22]  Pertti J. Pelto,et al.  Ethnographic Research: A Guide to General Conduct , 1987 .

[23]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Judgment under uncertainty: For those condemned to study the past: Heuristics and biases in hindsight , 1982 .

[24]  J. E. Russo,et al.  More Information Is Better: A Reevaluation of Jacoby, Speller and Kohn , 1974 .

[25]  Merrill Carlsmith.  Methods of research in social psychology , 1976 .

[26]  Michael D. Johnson.  Consumer Choice Strategies for Comparing Noncomparable Alternatives , 1984 .

[27]  P. Herr.  Priming Price: Prior Knowledge and Context Effects , 1989 .

[28]  D. Mccloskey.  The Rhetoric of Economics , 1988 .

[29]  Michael D. Johnson.  Modeling Choice Strategies for Noncomparable Alternatives , 1986 .

[30]  D. Campbell,et al.  Recency and primacy in persuasion as a function of the timing of speeches and measurements. , 1959, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[31]  C. B. Ferster,et al.  Schedules of reinforcement , 1957 .

[32]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  The Role of Attitude toward the Ad as a Mediator of Advertising Effectiveness: A Test of Competing Explanations: , 1986 .

[33]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  THINGS I HAVE LEARNED (SO FAR) , 1990 .

[34]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[35]  Stephen J. Hoch,et al.  Consumer Learning: Advertising and the Ambiguity of Product Experience , 1986 .

[36]  Ronald J. Faber,et al.  Compulsive Buying: A Phenomenological Exploration , 1989 .

[37]  Timothy B. Heath,et al.  The Cognitive Processing of Misleading Advertising in Young and Old Adults: Assessment and Training , 1987 .

[38]  F. Friedlander.  Type I and Type II Bias. , 1964 .

[39]  Shelby D. Hunt,et al.  Positivism and Paradigm Dominance in Consumer Research: Toward Critical Pluralism and Rapprochement , 1991 .

[40]  C. Geertz,et al.  The Interpretation of Cultures , 1973 .

[41]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Validity and the research process , 1986 .

[42]  M. Holbrook,et al.  On the Scientific Status of Consumer Research and the Need for an Interpretive Approach to Studying Consumption Behavior , 1988 .

[43]  Naturalistic, Humanistic, and Interpretive Inquiry: Challenges and Ultimate Potential , 1989 .

[44]  N. Pennington,et al.  Human judgment and decision making: Theories, methods, and procedures , 1980 .

[45]  G. Zukav,et al.  The Dancing Wu Li Masters , 1979 .

[46]  R. Deshpandé,et al.  “Paradigms Lost”: On Theory and Method in Research in Marketing , 1983 .

[47]  Alice M. Tybout,et al.  Confirmatory Versus Comparative Approaches to Judging Theory Tests , 1987 .

[48]  John F. Sherry,et al.  The Sacred and the Profane in Consumer Behavior: Theodicy on the Odyssey , 1989 .

[49]  John K. Smith,et al.  Closing Down the Conversation: The End of the Quantitative-Qualitative Debate Among Educational Inquirers , 1986 .

[50]  David Glen Mick,et al.  Self-Gifts: Phenomenological Insights from Four Contexts , 1990 .

[51]  Shelby D. Hunt,et al.  Marketing Theory: The Philosophy Of Marketing Science , 1983 .