Aligning Germline Cancer Predisposition With Tumor-Based Next-Generation Sequencing for Modern Oncology Diagnosis, Interception, and Therapeutic Development.

In the era of precision medicine, genomic interrogation for identification of both germline and somatic genetic alterations has become increasingly important. While such germline testing was usually undertaken via a phenotype-driven single-gene approach, with the advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, the widespread utilization of multigene panels, often agnostic of cancer phenotype, has become a commonplace in many different cancer types. At the same time, somatic tumor testing in oncology performed for the purpose of guiding therapeutic decisions for targeted therapies has also rapidly expanded, recently starting to incorporate not just patients with recurrent or metastatic cancer but even patients with early-stage disease. An integrated approach may be the best approach for the optimal management of patients with different cancers. The lack of complete congruence between germline and somatic NGS tests does not minimize the power or importance of either, but highlights the need to understand their limitations so as not to overlook an important finding or omission. NGS tests built to more uniformly and comprehensively evaluate both the germline and tumor simultaneously are urgently required and are in development. In this article, we discuss approaches to somatic and germline analyses in patients with cancer and the knowledge gained from integration of tumor-normal sequencing. We also detail strategies for the incorporation of genomic analysis into oncology care delivery models and the important emergence of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase and other DNA Damage Response inhibitors in the clinic for patients with cancer with germline and somatic BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.

[1]  M. Galsky,et al.  Avelumab Plus Talazoparib in Patients With BRCA1/2- or ATM-Altered Advanced Solid Tumors , 2022, JAMA oncology.

[2]  S. Greenberg,et al.  Discrepancies between tumor genomic profiling and germline genetic testing , 2022, ESMO open.

[3]  B. Taylor,et al.  The context-specific role of germline pathogenicity in tumorigenesis , 2021, Nature Genetics.

[4]  Z. Stadler,et al.  The Future of Parallel Tumor and Germline Genetic Testing: Is There a Role for All Patients With Cancer? , 2021, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[5]  A. Chinnaiyan,et al.  Is Universal Next-Generation Sequencing Testing of Patients With Advanced Cancer Ready for Prime Time?-Reply. , 2021, JAMA oncology.

[6]  S. Srinivas,et al.  Efficacy and safety of rucaparib in previously treated, locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma from a phase 2, open-label trial (ATLAS) , 2021, BMC Cancer.

[7]  D. Solit,et al.  Clinical cancer genomic profiling , 2021, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[8]  Amber M. Johnson,et al.  Precision Medicine in Oncology-Toward the Integrated Targeting of Somatic and Germline Genomic Aberrations. , 2021, JAMA oncology.

[9]  B. Karlan,et al.  Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. , 2021, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[10]  Stuart M. Gardos,et al.  Cancer therapy shapes the fitness landscape of clonal hematopoiesis , 2020, Nature Genetics.

[11]  R. Nussbaum,et al.  Yield and Utility of Germline Testing Following Tumor Sequencing in Patients With Cancer , 2020, JAMA network open.

[12]  B. Schneider,et al.  Identification of germline cancer predisposition variants during clinical ctDNA testing , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[13]  O. Ceyhan-Birsoy,et al.  Evolving Significance of Tumor-Normal Sequencing in Cancer Care. , 2020, Trends in cancer.

[14]  J. Garber,et al.  Li-Fraumeni syndrome: not a straightforward diagnosis anymore—the interpretation of pathogenic variants of low allele frequency and the differences between germline PVs, mosaicism, and clonal hematopoiesis , 2019, Breast Cancer Research.

[15]  N. Socci,et al.  Tumour lineage shapes BRCA-mediated phenotypes , 2019, Nature.

[16]  G. Mills,et al.  State-of-the-art strategies for targeting the DNA damage response in cancer , 2018, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[17]  Raymond M. Moore,et al.  Association Between Inherited Germline Mutations in Cancer Predisposition Genes and Risk of Pancreatic Cancer , 2018, JAMA.

[18]  R. Kamps,et al.  Next-Generation Sequencing in Oncology: Genetic Diagnosis, Risk Prediction and Cancer Classification , 2017, International journal of molecular sciences.

[19]  Tao Wang,et al.  Diagnostic Yield of Clinical Tumor and Germline Whole-Exome Sequencing for Children With Solid Tumors. , 2016, JAMA oncology.

[20]  Ann M. Bailey,et al.  Incidental germline variants in 1000 advanced cancers on a prospective somatic genomic profiling protocol. , 2016, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[21]  D. Hayes,et al.  Identification of Germline Variants in Tumor Genomic Sequencing Analysis. , 2018, The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD.

[22]  Donavan T. Cheng,et al.  Germline Variants in Targeted Tumor Sequencing Using Matched Normal DNA. , 2016, JAMA oncology.