Transfer learning improves resting-state functional connectivity pattern analysis using convolutional neural networks

Abstract Background Deep learning is gaining importance in the prediction of cognitive states and brain pathology based on neuroimaging data. Including multiple hidden layers in artificial neural networks enables unprecedented predictive power; however, the proper training of deep neural networks requires thousands of exemplars. Collecting this amount of data is not feasible in typical neuroimaging experiments. A handy solution to this problem, which has largely fallen outside the scope of deep learning applications in neuroimaging, is to repurpose deep networks that have already been trained on large datasets by fine-tuning them to target datasets/tasks with fewer exemplars. Here, we investigated how this method, called transfer learning, can aid age category classification and regression based on brain functional connectivity patterns derived from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. We trained a connectome-convolutional neural network on a larger public dataset and then examined how the knowledge learned can be used effectively to perform these tasks on smaller target datasets collected with a different type of scanner and/or imaging protocol and pre-processing pipeline. Results Age classification on the target datasets benefitted from transfer learning. Significant improvement (∼9%–13% increase in accuracy) was observed when the convolutional layers’ weights were initialized based on the values learned on the public dataset and then fine-tuned to the target datasets. Transfer learning also appeared promising in improving the otherwise poor prediction of chronological age. Conclusions Transfer learning is a plausible solution to adapt convolutional neural networks to neuroimaging data with few exemplars and different data acquisition and pre-processing protocols.

[1]  Michele T. Diaz,et al.  Function biomedical informatics research network recommendations for prospective multicenter functional MRI studies , 2012, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[2]  S. Rombouts,et al.  Reduced resting-state brain activity in the "default network" in normal aging. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[3]  Masaki Ishihara,et al.  Decreased Functional Connectivity by Aging Is Associated with Cognitive Decline , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[4]  Konrad P. Kording,et al.  Towards an integration of deep learning and neuroscience , 2016, bioRxiv.

[5]  J. Polimeni,et al.  Blipped‐controlled aliasing in parallel imaging for simultaneous multislice echo planar imaging with reduced g‐factor penalty , 2012, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  Christian Wachinger,et al.  Domain adaptation for Alzheimer's disease diagnostics , 2016, NeuroImage.

[7]  J. Cole,et al.  Predicting Age Using Neuroimaging: Innovative Brain Ageing Biomarkers , 2017, Trends in Neurosciences.

[8]  Margaret D. King,et al.  The NKI-Rockland Sample: A Model for Accelerating the Pace of Discovery Science in Psychiatry , 2012, Front. Neurosci..

[9]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Single subject prediction of brain disorders in neuroimaging: Promises and pitfalls , 2017, NeuroImage.

[10]  Krisztian Buza,et al.  Resting State fMRI Functional Connectivity-Based Classification Using a Convolutional Neural Network Architecture , 2017, Front. Neuroinform..

[11]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Deep Learning , 2015, Nature.

[12]  Kai Li,et al.  Computational approaches to fMRI analysis , 2017, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  Rupert Lanzenberger,et al.  Correlations and anticorrelations in resting-state functional connectivity MRI: A quantitative comparison of preprocessing strategies , 2009, NeuroImage.

[14]  Edward T. Bullmore,et al.  Efficiency and Cost of Economical Brain Functional Networks , 2007, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[15]  Michael S. Bernstein,et al.  ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge , 2014, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[16]  Konrad P. Körding,et al.  Toward an Integration of Deep Learning and Neuroscience , 2016, bioRxiv.

[17]  Stefan Carlsson,et al.  CNN Features Off-the-Shelf: An Astounding Baseline for Recognition , 2014, 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops.

[18]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  How transferable are features in deep neural networks? , 2014, NIPS.

[19]  Bing Chen,et al.  An open science resource for establishing reliability and reproducibility in functional connectomics , 2014, Scientific Data.

[20]  Kangcheng Wang,et al.  Structural and functional MRI from a cross-sectional Southwest University Adult lifespan Dataset (SALD) , 2017, bioRxiv.

[21]  Yong He,et al.  Functional connectomics from a “big data” perspective , 2017, NeuroImage.

[22]  Krzysztof J. Gorgolewski,et al.  Making big data open: data sharing in neuroimaging , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Probabilistic independent component analysis for functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[24]  Daoqiang Zhang,et al.  Multimodal manifold-regularized transfer learning for MCI conversion prediction , 2015, Brain Imaging and Behavior.

[25]  K. Walhovd,et al.  Structural Brain Changes in Aging: Courses, Causes and Cognitive Consequences , 2010, Reviews in the neurosciences.

[26]  Ludovica Griffanti,et al.  Hand classification of fMRI ICA noise components , 2017, NeuroImage.

[27]  Giovanni Montana,et al.  Predicting brain age with deep learning from raw imaging data results in a reliable and heritable biomarker , 2016, NeuroImage.

[28]  Rob Fergus,et al.  Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networks , 2013, ECCV.

[29]  Guigang Zhang,et al.  Deep Learning , 2016, Int. J. Semantic Comput..

[30]  Jimmy Ba,et al.  Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.

[31]  Nitish Srivastava,et al.  Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting , 2014, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[32]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Learning Neural Representations of Human Cognition across Many fMRI Studies , 2017 .

[33]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[34]  M. Greicius,et al.  Decoding subject-driven cognitive states with whole-brain connectivity patterns. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[35]  Maximilian Reiser,et al.  Classifying fMRI-derived resting-state connectivity patterns according to their daily rhythmicity , 2013, NeuroImage.

[36]  Ivan Laptev,et al.  Learning and Transferring Mid-level Image Representations Using Convolutional Neural Networks , 2014, 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[37]  Bharat B. Biswal,et al.  Making data sharing work: The FCP/INDI experience , 2013, NeuroImage.

[38]  Daoqiang Zhang,et al.  Multi-Domain Transfer Learning for Early Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s Disease , 2016, Neuroinformatics.

[39]  A. Mechelli,et al.  Using deep learning to investigate the neuroimaging correlates of psychiatric and neurological disorders: Methods and applications , 2017, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[40]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks , 2010, AISTATS.

[41]  Sida I. Wang,et al.  Dropout Training as Adaptive Regularization , 2013, NIPS.

[42]  Valerie Kirsch,et al.  Long-term test-retest reliability of resting-state networks in healthy elderly subjects and with amnestic mild cognitive impairment patients. , 2013, Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD.

[43]  Tom M. Mitchell,et al.  Machine learning classifiers and fMRI: A tutorial overview , 2009, NeuroImage.

[44]  S. Mueller,et al.  Long-Term Test-Retest Reliability of Resting-State Networks in Healthy Elderly Subjects and Mild Cognitive Impairment , 2012 .

[45]  Qiang Yang,et al.  A Survey on Transfer Learning , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[46]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  Introduction to machine learning for brain imaging , 2011, NeuroImage.

[47]  Hod Lipson,et al.  Understanding Neural Networks Through Deep Visualization , 2015, ArXiv.

[48]  Steven Salzberg,et al.  On Comparing Classifiers: Pitfalls to Avoid and a Recommended Approach , 1997, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery.

[49]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Rectified Linear Units Improve Restricted Boltzmann Machines , 2010, ICML.

[50]  V. Haughton,et al.  Frequencies contributing to functional connectivity in the cerebral cortex in "resting-state" data. , 2001, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[51]  John Scott Bridle,et al.  Probabilistic Interpretation of Feedforward Classification Network Outputs, with Relationships to Statistical Pattern Recognition , 1989, NATO Neurocomputing.

[52]  Trevor Darrell,et al.  DeCAF: A Deep Convolutional Activation Feature for Generic Visual Recognition , 2013, ICML.

[53]  Kawin Setsompop,et al.  Interslice leakage artifact reduction technique for simultaneous multislice acquisitions , 2014, Magnetic resonance in medicine.