A general test of association for quantitative traits in nuclear families.

High-resolution mapping is an important step in the identification of complex disease genes. In outbred populations, linkage disequilibrium is expected to operate over short distances and could provide a powerful fine-mapping tool. Here we build on recently developed methods for linkage-disequilibrium mapping of quantitative traits to construct a general approach that can accommodate nuclear families of any size, with or without parental information. Variance components are used to construct a test that utilizes information from all available offspring but that is not biased in the presence of linkage or familiality. A permutation test is described for situations in which maximum-likelihood estimates of the variance components are biased. Simulation studies are used to investigate power and error rates of this approach and to highlight situations in which violations of multivariate normality assumptions warrant the permutation test. The relationship between power and the level of linkage disequilibrium for this test suggests that the method is well suited to the analysis of dense maps. The relationship between power and family structure is investigated, and these results are applicable to study design in complex disease, especially for late-onset conditions for which parents are usually not available. When parental genotypes are available, power does not depend greatly on the number of offspring in each family. Power decreases when parental genotypes are not available, but the loss in power is negligible when four or more offspring per family are genotyped. Finally, it is shown that, when siblings are available, the total number of genotypes required in order to achieve comparable power is smaller if parents are not genotyped.

[1]  R. Lewontin,et al.  THE EVOLUTIONARY DYNAMICS OF COMPLEX POLYMORPHISMS , , , 1960 .

[2]  H. Grüneberg,et al.  Introduction to quantitative genetics , 1960 .

[3]  R. Elston,et al.  The investigation of linkage between a quantitative trait and a marker locus , 1972, Behavior genetics.

[4]  J. Mathews,et al.  Extensions to multivariate normal models for pedigree analysis , 1982, Annals of human genetics.

[5]  R. Elston,et al.  Testing the association between polymorphic markers and quantitative traits in pedigrees , 1987, Genetic epidemiology.

[6]  W. Ewens,et al.  Transmission test for linkage disequilibrium: the insulin gene region and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). , 1993, American journal of human genetics.

[7]  D Curtis,et al.  A note on the application of the transmission disequilibrium test when a parent is missing. , 1995, American journal of human genetics.

[8]  E. Boerwinkle,et al.  Assessing genetic linkage and association with robust components of variance approaches , 1996, Annals of human genetics.

[9]  N Risch,et al.  The Future of Genetic Studies of Complex Human Diseases , 1996, Science.

[10]  Leonid Kruglyak,et al.  The use of a genetic map of biallelic markers in linkage studies , 1997, Nature Genetics.

[11]  D Rabinowitz,et al.  A transmission disequilibrium test for quantitative trait loci. , 1997, Human heredity.

[12]  R. Guerra,et al.  A permutation test for the robust sib‐pair linkage method , 1997, Annals of human genetics.

[13]  B S Weir,et al.  Tests for linkage and association in nuclear families. , 1997, American journal of human genetics.

[14]  Francis S. Collins,et al.  Variations on a Theme: Cataloging Human DNA Sequence Variation , 1997, Science.

[15]  D. Curtis,et al.  Use of siblings as controls in case‐control association studies , 1997, Annals of human genetics.

[16]  A. Chakravarti It's raining SNPs, hallelujah? , 1998, Nature Genetics.

[17]  C R Weinberg,et al.  A log-linear approach to case-parent-triad data: assessing effects of disease genes that act either directly or through maternal effects and that may be subject to parental imprinting. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[18]  E. Martin,et al.  Sibling-based tests of linkage and association for quantitative traits. , 1999, American journal of human genetics.

[19]  Finite-sample properties of family-based association tests. , 1999, American journal of human genetics.

[20]  E. Lander Array of hope , 1999, Nature Genetics.

[21]  J K Hewitt,et al.  Combined linkage and association sib-pair analysis for quantitative traits. , 1999, American journal of human genetics.

[22]  L. Cardon A Sib-Pair Regression Model of Linkage Disequilibrium for Quantitative Traits , 2000, Human Heredity.

[23]  R C Elston,et al.  Transmission/disequilibrium tests for quantitative traits , 2001, Genetic epidemiology.