Rytov-approximation-based wave-equation traveltime tomography

Most finite-frequency traveltime tomography methods are based on the Born approximation, which requires that the scale of the velocity heterogeneity and the magnitude of the velocity perturbation should be small enough to satisfy the Born approximation. On the contrary, the Rytov approximation works well for large-scale velocity heterogeneity. Typically, the Rytov-approximation-based finite-frequency traveltime sensitivity kernel (Rytov-FFTSK) can be obtained by integrating the phase-delay sensitivity kernels with a normalized weighting function, in which the calculation of sensitivity kernels requires the numerical solution of Green’s function. However, solving the Green’s function explicitly is quite computationally demanding, especially for 3D problems. To avoid explicit calculation of the Green’s function, we show that the Rytov-FFTSK can be obtained by crosscorrelating a forward-propagated incident wavefield and reverse-propagated adjoint wavefield in the time domain. In addition, we find that the action of the Rytov-FFTSK on a model-space vector, e.g., the product of the sensitivity kernel and a vector, can be computed by calculating the inner product of two time-domain fields. Consequently, the Hessian-vector product can be computed in a matrix-free fashion (i.e., first calculate the product of the sensitivity kernel and a model-space vector and then calculate the product of the transposed sensitivity kernel and a data-space vector), without forming the Hessian matrix or the sensitivity kernels explicitly. We solve the traveltime inverse problem with the Gauss-Newton method, in which the Gauss-Newton equation is approximately solved by the conjugate gradient using our matrix-free Hessian-vector product method. An example with a perfect acquisition geometry found that our Rytov-approximation-based traveltime inversion method can produce a high-quality inversion result with a very fast convergence rate. An overthrust synthetic data test demonstrates that large- to intermediate-scale model perturbations can be recovered by diving waves if long-offset acquisition is available.

[1]  T. Alkhalifah,et al.  Traveltime sensitivity kernels for wave equation tomography using the unwrapped phase , 2014 .

[2]  Kim B. Olsen,et al.  Frechet Kernels for Imaging Regional Earth Structure Based on Three-Dimensional Reference Models , 2005 .

[3]  Carl Tape,et al.  Adjoint Tomography of the Southern California Crust , 2009, Science.

[4]  Wang Huazhong,et al.  Reverse time migration with source wavefield reconstruction strategy , 2012 .

[5]  Guy Chavent,et al.  Determination of background velocities by multiple migration fitting , 1995 .

[6]  Ludovic Métivier,et al.  The SEISCOPE optimization toolbox: A large-scale nonlinear optimization library based on reverse communication , 2016 .

[7]  E. D. Mercerat,et al.  On the linearity of cross-correlation delay times in finite-frequency tomography , 2012 .

[8]  Xiao‐Bi Xie,et al.  Validity of the Rytov Approximation in the Form of Finite-Frequency Sensitivity Kernels , 2015, Pure and Applied Geophysics.

[9]  Hui Yang,et al.  The finite-frequency sensitivity kernel for migration residual moveout and its applications in migration velocity analysis , 2008 .

[10]  Guy Chavent,et al.  Waveform Inversion of Reflection Seismic Data for Kinematic Parameters by Local Optimization , 1998, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[11]  Marta Woodward,et al.  Wave-equation tomography , 1992 .

[12]  F. Dahlen,et al.  Traveltimes of waves in three-dimensional random media , 2003 .

[13]  Carl Tape,et al.  Finite‐frequency tomography using adjoint methods—Methodology and examples using membrane surface waves , 2007 .

[14]  Liangguo Dong,et al.  An improved scattering-integral approach for frequency-domain full waveform inversion , 2015 .

[15]  Guust Nolet,et al.  Fréchet kernels for finite‐frequency traveltimes—II. Examples , 2000 .

[16]  Jeroen Tromp,et al.  Finite-frequency sensitivity kernels for global seismic wave propagation based upon adjoint methods , 2008 .

[17]  Liangguo Dong,et al.  Sensitivity kernels for seismic Fresnel volume tomography , 2009 .

[18]  Thomas H. Jordan,et al.  Three‐dimensional Fréchet differential kernels for seismicdelay times , 2000 .

[19]  Which traveltime tomography should be used in near-surface velocity inversion? , 2018, SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2018.

[20]  Guust Nolet,et al.  Fréchet kernels for finite-frequency traveltimes—I. Theory , 2000 .

[21]  Andreas Fichtner,et al.  Hessian kernels of seismic data functionals based upon adjoint techniques , 2011 .

[22]  D. Smeulders,et al.  Validation of first-order diffraction theory for the traveltimes and amplitudes of propagating waves , 2006 .

[23]  Yunseok Choi,et al.  From tomography to full-waveform inversion with a single objective function , 2014 .

[24]  J. Tromp,et al.  Finite-Frequency Kernels Based on Adjoint Methods , 2006 .

[25]  Qinya Liu,et al.  Tomography, Adjoint Methods, Time-Reversal, and Banana-Doughnut Kernels , 2004 .

[26]  T. Alkhalifah Full-model wavenumber inversion: An emphasis on the appropriate wavenumber continuation , 2016 .

[27]  Ludovic Métivier,et al.  Full Waveform Inversion and the Truncated Newton Method , 2013, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[28]  L. Chiao,et al.  Imaging seismic velocity structure beneath the Iceland hot spot: A finite frequency approach , 2004 .

[29]  Gerard T. Schuster,et al.  Wave-equation traveltime inversion , 1991 .

[30]  Jeroen Tromp,et al.  Double-difference adjoint seismic tomography , 2016, 1607.01811.

[31]  E. Engdahl,et al.  Finite-Frequency Tomography Reveals a Variety of Plumes in the Mantle , 2004, Science.

[32]  R. Snieder,et al.  The Fresnel volume and transmitted waves , 2004 .

[33]  R. Wu,et al.  Wave Propagation, Scattering and Imaging Using Dual-domain One-way and One-return Propagators , 2003 .

[34]  Parallel Multiscale Gauss-Newton-Krylov Methods for Inverse Wave Propagation , 2002 .

[35]  F. Dahlen,et al.  Traveltime biases in random media and the S-wave discrepancy , 2004 .

[36]  J. Claerbout Earth Soundings Analysis: Processing Versus Inversion , 1992 .

[37]  T. Jordan,et al.  FAST TRACK PAPER: Full three-dimensional tomography: a comparison between the scattering-integral and adjoint-wavefield methods , 2007 .

[38]  Roel Snieder,et al.  Wavefield smoothing and the effect of rough velocity perturbations on arrival times and amplitudes , 1996 .

[39]  Guust Nolet,et al.  Three-dimensional sensitivity kernels for finite-frequency traveltimes: the banana–doughnut paradox , 1999 .

[40]  R. Snieder,et al.  The effect of small-scale heterogeneity on the arrival time of waves , 2001 .