Evaluative Aspects of Creative Thought: Effects of Appraisal and Revision Standards

Recent research has begun to stress the influence of evaluation on creative thought. The authors begin this article by arguing that the evaluation of new ideas is a complex process involving forecasting, appraisal, and revision, where different standards might be applied to different ideas during appraisal and revision. The influence of appraisal and revision standards on creative problem solving was examined by asking 148 undergraduates to appraise and revise highly original, original, and nonoriginal ideas generated for an advertising campaign under conditions in which the standards to be applied stressed the generation of new ideas or under conditions in which the standards to be applied stressed efficiency of current operations. It was found that better plans for these advertising campaigns were obtained when generative, or innovative, criteria were applied to less original ideas and when implementation efficiency, or operating, criteria were applied to more original ideas. It was concluded that evaluation may serve to remediate deficiencies in ideas but that the standards applied must vary with the nature of the idea and the context in which it is to be implemented

[1]  W. R. Smith,et al.  Interpersonal and intrapersonal evaluations of creative ideas , 1992 .

[2]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  Motivation and creativity. , 1998 .

[3]  Paul Milgram,et al.  Planning behavior and its functional role in interactions with complex systems , 1997, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[4]  A. Goor,et al.  A comparison of problem-solving processes of creative students and noncreative students. , 1975, Journal of educational psychology.

[5]  Anurag Sharma,et al.  Central Dilemmas of Managing Innovation in Large Firms , 1999 .

[6]  Mark A. Runco,et al.  Problem finding, evaluative thinking, and creativity. , 1994 .

[7]  Raymond M. Berger,et al.  A factor-analytic study of planning abilities. , 1957 .

[8]  M. Csíkszentmihályi.  Implications of a Systems Perspective for the Study of Creativity , 1998 .

[9]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  S. Rostan,et al.  Problem finding, problem solving, and cognitive controls: An empirical investigation of critically acclaimed productivity , 1994 .

[11]  R. Hogarth.  Judgement and choice: The psychology of decision , 1982 .

[12]  J. Ivancevich.  Predicting job performance by use of ability tests and studying job satisfaction as a moderating variable , 1976 .

[13]  Michael D. Mumford,et al.  Problem construction and cognition: Applying problem representations in ill-defined domains. , 1994 .

[14]  Leon Mann,et al.  The Innovation Imperative , 2001 .

[15]  Michael D. Mumford,et al.  Domain-Based Scoring in Divergent-Thinking Tests: Validation Evidence in an Occupational Sample , 1998 .

[16]  Harald Schaub,et al.  Errors in Planning and Decision‐making and the Nature of Human Information Processing , 1994 .

[17]  M. Runco,et al.  Problem Construction and Creativity: The Role of Ability, Cue Consistency, and Active Processing , 1997 .

[18]  M. Runco,et al.  Creativity and the Finding and Solving of Real-World Problems , 1991 .

[19]  Dennis R. Brophy.  Understanding, Measuring, and Enhancing Individual Creative Problem-Solving Efforts , 1998 .

[20]  Peter K. Mills,et al.  Managerial practices that enhance innovation , 1985 .

[21]  Michael D. Mumford,et al.  Cases of Social Innovation: Lessons From Two Innovations in the 20th Century , 2003 .

[22]  Paul R. Christensen,et al.  The role of intellectual factors in problem solving. , 1962 .

[23]  D. J. Lewis,et al.  A factor-analytic study of creative-thinking abilities , 1954 .

[24]  Deborah Dougherty,et al.  Organizational Capacities for Sustained Product Innovation , 1998 .

[25]  M. Mumford,et al.  Process analytic models of creative capacities: Evidence for the combination and reorganization process , 1992 .

[26]  Michael D. Mumford,et al.  Picking the right material: Cognitive processing skills and their role in creative thought. , 2003 .

[27]  S. Isaksen,et al.  Creative Problem Solving: The Basic Course , 1985 .

[28]  Min Basadur,et al.  Optimal Ideation-Evaluation Ratios , 1995 .

[29]  Min Basadur,et al.  Assessing Ideational and Evaluative Skills and Creative Styles and Attitudes , 1993 .

[30]  M. Mumford,et al.  Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. , 1988 .

[31]  R. Sternberg.  A three-facet model of creativity. , 1988 .

[32]  Jing Zhou,et al.  Enhancing Creative Performance: Effects of Expected Developmental Assessment Strategies and Creative Personality , 2001 .

[33]  Michael D. Mumford,et al.  Something Old, Something New: Revisiting Guilford's Conception of Creative Problem Solving , 2001 .

[34]  Mark A. Runco,et al.  Scoring Divergent Thinking Tests Using Total Ideational Output and a Creativity Index , 1992 .

[35]  P. D. Stokes.  Variations on Guilford's Creative Abilities , 2001 .

[36]  John Baer.  The Case for Domain Specificity of Creativity , 1998 .

[37]  Joseph Kasof,et al.  Explaining Creativity: The Attributional Perspective , 1995 .

[38]  J. Plucker,et al.  Handbook of Creativity: Psychometric Approaches to the Study of Human Creativity , 1998 .

[39]  T. Lubart.  Models of the Creative Process: Past, Present and Future , 2001 .

[40]  L. Ryhammar,et al.  The Creative Climate: Its Determinants and Effects at a Swedish University , 1999 .

[41]  Bente R. Løwendahl.  Organizing the Lillehammer Olympic Winter games , 1995 .

[42]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Creative Cognition: Theory, Research, and Applications , 1996 .

[43]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations: An Up-To-Date Review and Commentary , 1979 .

[44]  M. Mumford.  Managing Creative People: Strategies and Tactics for Innovation , 2000 .

[45]  M. Mumford.  Social Innovation: Ten Cases From Benjamin Franklin , 2002 .

[46]  Douglas D. Moesel,et al.  The Market for Corporate Control and Firm Innovation , 1996 .

[47]  J. Slocum,et al.  Designing organizations for competitive advantage: The power of unlearning and learning , 1999 .

[48]  M. Mumford,et al.  Evaluating Creative Ideas , 2002 .

[49]  M. Mumford,et al.  Leadership in scientific organizations , 2003 .

[50]  Gary L. Frankwick,et al.  Belief structures in conflict: Mapping a strategic marketing decision , 1994 .

[51]  Laura B. Cardinal,et al.  Internal knowledge generation: the research laboratory and innovative productivity in the pharmaceutical industry , 2000 .

[52]  Janet E. Davidson,et al.  The Role of Insight in Intellectual Giftedness , 1984 .

[53]  Michael D. Mumford,et al.  Process analytic models of creative capacities , 1991 .

[54]  Susan Kitchell.  Corporate culture, environmental adaptation, and innovation adoption: A qualitative/quantitative approach , 1995 .

[55]  J. Mathieu,et al.  Goal Orientation in Organizational Research: A Conceptual and Empirical Foundation , 1996 .

[56]  N. Charness,et al.  Expert Performance Its Structure and Acquisition , 2002 .

[57]  Michael D. Mumford,et al.  Process-Analytic Models of creative Capacities: Operations Influencing the Combination-and-Reorganization Process , 1995 .

[58]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Strategic sensemaking and organizational performance: linkages among scanning, interpretation, action, and outcomes. , 1993, Academy of Management journal. Academy of Management.

[59]  Paul R. Christensen,et al.  A factor-analytic study across the domains of reasoning, creativity, and evaluation. , 1959 .

[60]  M. Runco,et al.  Understanding How Creative Thinking Skills, Attitudes and Behaviors Work Together: A Causal Process Model , 2000 .

[61]  R. Weisberg.  Creativity and knowledge: A challenge to theories. , 1998 .

[62]  Sharon Bailin.  CREATIVITY IN CONTEXT , 2002 .

[63]  Claudia Bird Schoonhoven,et al.  Community, Population, and Organization Effects on Innovation: A Multilevel Perspective , 1996 .

[64]  Norman R. F. Maier,et al.  Acceptance and Quality of Solutions as Related to Leaders' Attitudes toward Disagreement in Group Problem Solving , 1965 .

[65]  M. Mumford,et al.  Divergent Thinking, Intelligence, and Expertise: A Test of Alternative Models , 2002 .

[66]  Kristian J. Hammond,et al.  Case-Based Planning: A Framework for Planning from Experience , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[67]  Benjamin Kuipers,et al.  Critical Decisions under Uncertainty: Representation and Structure , 1990, Cogn. Sci..

[68]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  ? + ? = creativity. , 2018, Public health nursing.

[69]  Shane Connelly,et al.  How creative leaders think: Experimental findings and cases , 2003 .

[70]  HU Min-zhong,et al.  On Creative Cognition , 2005 .

[71]  Stephen J. Read,et al.  The effects of expertise on financial problem solving: Evidence for goal-directed, problem-solving scripts , 1990 .

[72]  Min Basadur,et al.  Assessing ideational and evaluative skills and creative styles and attitudes , 1990, IEEE International Conference on Engineering Management, Gaining the Competitive Advantage.

[73]  Rosemary A. Schultz,et al.  Performance in Planning: Processes, Requirements, and Errors , 2001 .

[74]  M. Mumford,et al.  Tradeoffs Between Ideas and Structure: Individual Versus Group Performance in Creative Problem Solving , 2001 .