The diachronic semantics of English again

This paper explores the diachronic development of the English adverb again. A compositional semantic analysis of its grammar at various stages is provided. It is argued that this analysis must consist of a staging of first a lexical and then a structural change, in order to adequately model the sequence of individual developmental steps observed in the historical corpus data, and that it provides an insight into pathways of semantic change in general.

[1]  G. Diewald.  A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization , 2002 .

[2]  R. Eckardt.  Grammaticalization and Semantic Reanalysis , 2012 .

[3]  C. Gevaert.  The history of ANGER : the lexical field of ANGER from Old to Early Modern English , 2007 .

[4]  Arnim von Stechow,et al.  Lexical decomposition in syntax , 1995 .

[5]  M. Krifka.  The Origins of Telicity , 1998 .

[6]  J. Bosworth,et al.  An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary; Based on the Manuscript Collections of the Late Joseph Bosworth , 2012 .

[7]  Bernd Heine,et al.  On the role of context in grammaticalization , 2002 .

[8]  A. Alexiadou,et al.  Perfects, Resultatives, and Auxiliaries in Earlier English , 2010, Linguistic Inquiry.

[9]  Max J. Cresswell.  Prepositions and points of view , 1978 .

[10]  Regine Eckardt.  Semantic Reanalysis and Language Change , 2011, Lang. Linguistics Compass.

[11]  Irene Heim,et al.  Semantics in generative grammar , 1998 .

[12]  David R. Dowty,et al.  Word Meaning and Montague Grammar , 1979 .

[13]  S. I. Tucker,et al.  The Anglo-Saxon chronicle : a revised translation , 1963 .

[14]  David Willis,et al.  Never again: the multiple grammaticalization of never as a marker of negation in English1 , 2012, English Language and Linguistics.

[15]  Charlotte Galves,et al.  The Change in Clitic Placement from Classical to Modern European Portuguese: Results from the Tycho Brahe Corpus , 2005 .

[17]  Diane C. Lillo-Martin,et al.  An introduction to linguistic theory and language acquisition , 1999 .

[18]  Anthony Warner,et al.  Why DO dove: Evidence for register variation in Early Modern English negatives , 2005, Language Variation and Change.

[19]  Nicholas Evans,et al.  In the Mind's Ear: The Semantic Extensions of Perception Verbs in Australian Languages. , 2000 .

[20]  S Carlota,et al.  Dowty, David. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar: The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and in Montague's PTQ. Dordrecht: Reidel. , 2005 .

[21]  Arnim von Stechow,et al.  The Different Readings of Wieder 'Again': A Structural Account , 1996, J. Semant..

[22]  Gustaf Stern,et al.  Meaning and Change of Meaning: with Special Reference to the English Language , 1975 .

[23]  SIGRID BECK,et al.  There and Back Again: A Semantic Analysis , 2005, J. Semant..

[24]  A. Ellegård.  The auxiliary do : the establishment and regulation of its use in English , 1955 .

[25]  Joel C. Wallenberg,et al.  How variational acquisition drives syntactic change , 2013 .

[26]  B. Partee.  Some Structural Analogies between Tenses and Pronouns in English , 1973 .

[27]  Arnim von Stechow,et al.  German seit ‘since’ and the ambiguity of the German perfect , 2003 .

[28]  Wolfgang Klein,et al.  Time and again , 2001 .

[29]  A. Kroch.  Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change , 1989, Language Variation and Change.

[30]  Gerhard Jäger,et al.  Against Lexical Decomposition in Syntax , 1999 .

[31]  Walter Pedersen,et al.  Two Sources of Again-Ambiguities: Evidence from Degree-Achievement Predicates , 2009, Amsterdam Colloquium on Logic, Language and Meaning.

[32]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World , 1994 .

[33]  Maatje Barbara Elenbaas,et al.  The synchronic and diachronic syntax of the English verb-particle combination , 2007 .

[34]  Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen,et al.  Wieder éin wieder? Zur Semantik von wieder , 1983 .

[35]  Back to Back: The Trajectory of an Old Borrowing , 2011 .

[36]  Richard B. Dasher,et al.  Regularity in Semantic Change , 2002 .

[37]  Ann Taylor,et al.  The Loss of OV Order in the History of English , 2008 .

[38]  Sigrid Beck,et al.  The Use of Again in 19th-Century English versus Present-Day English , 2009 .

[39]  R. Eckardt.  Meaning Change in Grammaticalization , 2006 .

[40]  Seth Kulick,et al.  The Penn Parsed Corpus of Modern British English: First Parsing Results and Analysis , 2014, ACL.

[41]  Marianne Celce-Murcia,et al.  The English perfect : tense-choice and pragmatic inferences , 1978 .

[42]  Sigrid Beck,et al.  Early Modern English again: a corpus study and semantic analysis , 2014, English Language and Linguistics.

[43]  Arnim von Stechow,et al.  Fast 'Almost' and the Visibility Parameter for Functional Adverbs , 1999, J. Semant..

[44]  Lou Burnard,et al.  Oxford Text Archive , 1991 .

[45]  HANS KAMP,et al.  REMARKS ON LEXICAL STRUCTURE AND DRS CONSTRUCTION , 1994 .

[46]  Wolfgang Sternefeld,et al.  Audiatur vox sapientiae : a Festschrift for Arnim von Stechow , 2001 .

[47]  Regine Eckardt,et al.  Meaning Change in Grammaticalization: An Enquiry into Semantic Reanalysis , 2006 .

[48]  Sigrid Beck,et al.  Focus on Again , 2006 .

[49]  Arnim von Stechow,et al.  Eine erweiterte Extended Now-Theorie für Perfekt und Futur , 1999 .

[50]  Anthony S. Kroch,et al.  The rightward movement of complements and adjuncts in the Old English of Beowulf , 1989, Language Variation and Change.

[51]  William Snyder,et al.  On the Nature of Syntactic Variation: Evidence from Complex Predicates and Complex Word-Formation , 2001 .

[52]  A. Kratzer.  More Structural Analogies Between Pronouns and Tenses , 1998 .