Fluidic Haptic Interface for Mechano-Tactile Feedback

Notable advancements have been achieved in providing amputees with sensation through invasive and non-invasive haptic feedback systems such as mechano-, vibro-, electro-tactile and hybrid systems. Purely mechanical-driven feedback approaches, however, have been little explored. In this paper, we now created a haptic feedback system that does not require any external power source (such as batteries) or other electronic components (see <xref ref-type="fig" rid="fig1">Fig. 1</xref> ). The system is low-cost, lightweight, adaptable and robust against external impact (such as water). Hence, it will be sustainable in many aspects. We have made use of latest multi-material 3D printing technology (Stratasys Objet500 Connex3) being able to fabricate a soft sensor and a mechano-tactile feedback actuator made of a rubber (TangoBlack Plus) and plastic (VeroClear) material. When forces are applied to the fingertip sensor, fluidic pressure inside the system acts on the membrane of the feedback actuator resulting in mechano-tactile sensation. Our <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\varnothing 7\,\mathrm{mm}$</tex-math></inline-formula> feedback actuator is able to transmit a force range between <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$0.2\,\mathrm{N}$</tex-math></inline-formula> (the median touch threshold) and <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$2.1\,\mathrm{N}$</tex-math></inline-formula> (the maximum force transmitted by the feedback actuator at a <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$3\,\mathrm{mm}$</tex-math></inline-formula> indentation) corresponding to force range exerted to the fingertip sensor of <inline-formula><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$1.2-18.49\,\mathrm{N}$</tex-math></inline-formula>.

[1]  C. Dolea,et al.  World Health Organization , 1949, International Organization.

[2]  Organización Mundial de la Salud Guidelines for training personnel in developing countries for prosthetic and orthotic services , 1990 .

[3]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  A Mathematical Introduction to Robotic Manipulation , 1994 .

[4]  Yasunori Kawanami,et al.  The gripping device , 1997 .

[5]  S. Kawamura,et al.  Analysis of stiffness of human fingertip and comparison with artificial fingers , 1999, IEEE SMC'99 Conference Proceedings. 1999 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (Cat. No.99CH37028).

[6]  Gerd Hirzinger,et al.  Calculating hand configurations for precision and pinch grasps , 2002, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[7]  K. Fisher,et al.  How does Counseling Help People with Amputation? , 2002 .

[8]  Dudley S. Childress,et al.  Closed-loop control in prosthetic systems: Historical perspective , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  Tamitza Toroyan,et al.  Global status report on road safety , 2009, Injury Prevention.

[10]  Petar Kolendić,et al.  A review of explicit approximations of Colebrook's equation , 2011 .

[11]  G. Lundborg,et al.  Sensory feedback from a prosthetic hand based on air-mediated pressure from the hand to the forearm skin. , 2012, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[12]  Jacqueline S. Hebert,et al.  Applications of sensory feedback in motorized upper extremity prosthesis: a review , 2014, Expert review of medical devices.

[13]  Jae-Won Choi,et al.  Anthropomorphic finger antagonistically actuated by SMA plates , 2015, Bioinspiration & biomimetics.

[14]  Christian Cipriani,et al.  Treatment of the Partial Hand Amputation: An Engineering Perspective , 2016, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  Christian Antfolk,et al.  A review of invasive and non-invasive sensory feedback in upper limb prostheses , 2017, Expert review of medical devices.

[16]  D. Choi,et al.  Material models and finite analysis of additively printed polymer composites , 2018, Journal of Composite Materials.