Evidence for shutter‐speed variation in CR bolus‐tracking studies of human pathology

The standard pharmacokinetic model for the analysis of MRI contrast reagent (CR) bolus‐tracking (B‐T) data assumes that the mean intracellular water molecule lifetime (τi) is effectively zero. This assertion is inconsistent with a considerable body of physiological measurements. Furthermore, theory and simulation show the B‐T time‐course shape to be very sensitive to the τi magnitude in the physiological range (hundreds of milliseconds to several seconds). Consequently, this standard model aspect can cause significant underestimations (factors of 2 or 3) of the two parameters usually determined: Ktrans, the vascular wall CR transfer rate constant, and ve, the CR distribution volume (the extracellular, extravascular space fraction). Analyses of animal model data confirmed two predicted behaviors indicative of this standard model inadequacy: (1) a specific temporal pattern for the mismatch between the best‐fitted curve and data; and (2) an inverse dependence of the curve's Ktrans and ve magnitudes on the CR dose. These parameters should be CR dose‐independent. The most parsimonious analysis allowing for realistic τi values is the ‘shutter‐speed’ model. Its application to the experimental animal data essentially eliminated the two standard model signature inadequacies. This paper reports the first survey for the extent of this ‘shutter‐speed effect’ in human data. Retrospective analyses are made of clinical data chosen from a range of pathology (the active multiple sclerosis lesion, the invasive ductal carcinoma breast tumor, and osteosarcoma in the leg) that provides a wide variation, particularly of Ktrans. The signature temporal mismatch of the standard model is observed in all cases, and is essentially eliminated by use of the shutter‐speed model. Pixel‐by‐pixel maps show that parameter values from the shutter‐speed analysis are increased by more than a factor of 3 for some lesion regions. This endows the lesions with very high contrast, and reveals heterogeneities that are often not seen in the standard model maps. Normal muscle regions in the leg allow validation of the shutter‐speed model Ktrans, ve, and τi magnitudes, by comparison with results of previous careful rat leg studies not possible for human subjects. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  M Zaitsev,et al.  Error reduction and parameter optimization of the TAPIR method for fast T1 mapping , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[2]  A. Crawley,et al.  A comparison of one‐shot and recovery methods in T1 imaging , 1988, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  G Brix,et al.  Pathophysiologic basis of contrast enhancement in breast tumors , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[4]  Michael V Knopp,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging in oncology for diagnosis and therapy monitoring. , 2003, Molecular cancer therapeutics.

[5]  Thomas E Yankeelov,et al.  Variation of the relaxographic “shutter‐speed” for transcytolemmal water exchange affects the CR bolus‐tracking curve shape , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  B R Rosen,et al.  Improving MR quantification of regional blood volume with intravascular T1 contrast agents: Accuracy, precision, and water exchange , 1996, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  Xin Li,et al.  Equilibrium transcytolemmal water‐exchange kinetics in skeletal muscle in vivo , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  W E Reddick,et al.  Dynamic MR imaging (DEMRI) of microcirculation in bone sarcoma , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[9]  Charles S Springer,et al.  Equilibrium water exchange between the intra‐ and extracellular spaces of mammalian brain , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  P. Tofts Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd‐DTPA MR imaging , 1997, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  M. Knopp,et al.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast‐enhanced t1‐weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: Standardized quantities and symbols , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[12]  P A Narayana,et al.  A pharmacokinetic model for quantitative evaluation of spinal cord injury with dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  Xiaobing Fan,et al.  New model for analysis of dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI data distinguishes metastatic from nonmetastatic transplanted rodent prostate tumors , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[14]  Jeroen van der Grond,et al.  Model of the human vasculature for studying the influence of contrast injection speed on cerebral perfusion MRI , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  Paul A Meyers,et al.  Osteogenic and Ewing sarcomas: estimation of necrotic fraction during induction chemotherapy with dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. , 2003, Radiology.

[16]  Rong Zhou,et al.  Simultaneous measurement of arterial input function and tumor pharmacokinetics in mice by dynamic contrast enhanced imaging: Effects of transcytolemmal water exchange , 2004, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[17]  F. Jolesz,et al.  MRI contrast uptake in new lesions in relapsing-remitting MS followed at weekly intervals , 2003, Neurology.

[18]  Wibeke Nordhøy,et al.  Manganese ions as intracellular contrast agents: proton relaxation and calcium interactions in rat myocardium , 2003, NMR in biomedicine.

[19]  G. Glover,et al.  Breast disease: dynamic spiral MR imaging. , 1998, Radiology.

[20]  M. Knopp,et al.  Dynamic contrast‐enhanced MRI using Gd‐DTPA: Interindividual variability of the arterial input function and consequences for the assessment of kinetics in tumors , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[21]  W. Rooney,et al.  Determination of the MRI contrast agent concentration time course in vivo following bolus injection: Effect of equilibrium transcytolemmal water exchange , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[22]  M. Knopp,et al.  Functional tumor imaging with dynamic contrast‐enhanced magnetic resonance imaging , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[23]  F. Kelcz,et al.  Critical role of spatial resolution in dynamic contrast‐enhanced breast MRI , 2001, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[24]  W. Rooney,et al.  The effects of equilibrium transcytolemmal water exchange on the determination of contrast reagent concentration in vivo , 2002 .

[25]  A. Padhani,et al.  Reproducibility of quantitative dynamic MRI of normal human tissues , 2002, NMR in biomedicine.

[26]  C. Springer,et al.  Using flow relaxography to elucidate flow relaxivity. , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[27]  Wei Huang,et al.  Detection of breast malignancy: diagnostic MR protocol for improved specificity. , 2004, Radiology.

[28]  Wolfgang Dreher,et al.  Diffusion in compartmental systems. II. Diffusion‐weighted measurements of rat brain tissue in vivo and postmortem at very large b‐values , 2003, Magnetic resonance in medicine.