Interactions between Conscious and Subconscious Signals: Selective Attention under Feature-Based Competition Increases Neural Selectivity during Brain Adaptation

Efficient perception in natural environments depends on neural interactions between voluntary processes within cognitive control, such as attention, and those that are automatic and subconscious, such as brain adaptation to predictable input (also called repetition suppression). Although both attention and adaptation have been studied separately and there is considerable knowledge of the neurobiology involved in each of these processes, how attention interacts with adaptation remains equivocal. We examined how attention interacts with visual and auditory adaptation by measuring neuroimaging effects consistent with changes in either neural gain or selectivity. Male and female human participants were scanned with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) first while they discriminated repetition of morphed faces or voices and either directed their attention to stimulus identity or spatial location. Attention to face or voice identity, while ignoring stimulus location, solely increased the gain of respectively face- or voice-sensitive cortex. The results were strikingly different in an experiment when participants attended to voice identity versus stimulus loudness. In this case, attention to voice while ignoring sound loudness increased neural selectivity. The combined results show that how attention affects adaptation depends on the level of feature-based competition, reconciling prior conflicting observations. The findings are theoretically important and are discussed in relation to neurobiological interactions between attention and different types of predictive signals. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Adaptation to repeated environmental events is ubiquitous in the animal brain, an automatic typically subconscious, predictive signal. Cognitive influences, such as by attention, powerfully affect sensory processing and can overcome brain adaptation. However, how neural interactions occur between adaptation and attention remains controversial. We conducted fMRI experiments regulating the focus of attention during adaptation to repeated stimuli with perceptually balanced stimulus expectancy. We observed an interaction between attention and adaptation consistent with increased neural selectivity, but only under conditions of feature-based competition, challenging the notion that attention interacts with brain adaptation by only affecting response gain. This demonstrates that attention retains its full complement of mechanistic influences on sensory cortex even as it interacts with more automatic or subconscious predictive processes.

[1]  D. Heeger,et al.  The Normalization Model of Attention , 2009, Neuron.

[2]  Jochen Kaiser,et al.  Effects of feature-selective attention on auditory pattern and location processing , 2008, NeuroImage.

[3]  R. Henson,et al.  BOLD repetition decreases in object-responsive ventral visual areas depend on spatial attention. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  Yukiko Kikuchi,et al.  Structured sequence processing and combinatorial binding: neurobiologically and computationally informed hypotheses , 2019, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.

[5]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  fMRI-adaptation and category selectivity in human ventral temporal cortex: regional differences across time scales. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  Rufin Vogels,et al.  Face Repetition Probability Does Not Affect Repetition Suppression in Macaque Inferotemporal Cortex , 2018, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  C. Summerfield,et al.  Expectation in perceptual decision making: neural and computational mechanisms , 2014, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[8]  R. Zatorre,et al.  Where is 'where' in the human auditory cortex? , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[9]  S. Edelman,et al.  Differential Processing of Objects under Various Viewing Conditions in the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 1999, Neuron.

[10]  Jim M. Monti,et al.  Neural repetition suppression reflects fulfilled perceptual expectations , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  Nikos K. Logothetis,et al.  Widespread and Opponent fMRI Signals Represent Sound Location in Macaque Auditory Cortex , 2017, Neuron.

[12]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Bayesian inference and attentional modulation in the visual cortex , 2005, Neuroreport.

[14]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Feature-based attention in visual cortex , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[15]  Greg O. Horne,et al.  Controlling low-level image properties: The SHINE toolbox , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[16]  J. Schultz,et al.  Natural facial motion enhances cortical responses to faces , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[18]  Ninon Burgos,et al.  New advances in the Clinica software platform for clinical neuroimaging studies , 2019 .

[19]  Jonas Larsson,et al.  fMRI repetition suppression: neuronal adaptation or stimulus expectation? , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[20]  Janneke F. M. Jehee,et al.  Less Is More: Expectation Sharpens Representations in the Primary Visual Cortex , 2012, Neuron.

[21]  HIDEKI KAWAHARA,et al.  Technical foundations of TANDEM-STRAIGHT, a speech analysis, modification and synthesis framework , 2011 .

[22]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Unmasking Latent Inhibitory Connections in Human Cortex to Reveal Dormant Cortical Memories , 2016, Neuron.

[23]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[24]  C. Pantev,et al.  Attention Improves Population-Level Frequency Tuning in Human Auditory Cortex , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[25]  Peter Földiák,et al.  Adaptation and decorrelation in the cortex , 1989 .

[26]  R. Zatorre,et al.  Voice-selective areas in human auditory cortex , 2000, Nature.

[27]  R. Desimone Visual attention mediated by biased competition in extrastriate visual cortex. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[28]  R. Bowtell,et al.  “sparse” temporal sampling in auditory fMRI , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[29]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Canonical Microcircuits for Predictive Coding , 2012, Neuron.

[30]  C. Summerfield,et al.  Expectation (and attention) in visual cognition , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[31]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  FSL , 2012, NeuroImage.

[32]  F. D. Lange,et al.  How Do Expectations Shape Perception? , 2018, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[33]  Jonas Larsson,et al.  Spatial specificity and inheritance of adaptation in human visual cortex , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  E. Wojciulik,et al.  Attention increases neural selectivity in the human lateral occipital complex , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[35]  Janneke F. M. Jehee,et al.  Attention Reverses the Effect of Prediction in Silencing Sensory Signals , 2011, Cerebral cortex.

[36]  C. Clifford,et al.  A functional angle on some after-effects in cortical vision , 2000, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[37]  M. Malmierca,et al.  The cortical modulation of stimulus-specific adaptation in the auditory midbrain and thalamus: a potential neuronal correlate for predictive coding , 2015, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[38]  Michael W. Spratling Predictive coding as a model of biased competition in visual attention , 2008, Vision Research.

[39]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A theory of cortical responses , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[40]  Carles Escera,et al.  Neurons along the auditory pathway exhibit a hierarchical organization of prediction error , 2017, Nature Communications.

[41]  Q. Vuong,et al.  The Respective Role of Low and High Spatial Frequencies in Supporting Configural and Featural Processing of Faces , 2005, Perception.

[42]  Hideki Kawahara,et al.  Tandem-STRAIGHT: A temporally stable power spectral representation for periodic signals and applications to interference-free spectrum, F0, and aperiodicity estimation , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[43]  Timothy E. J. Behrens,et al.  Online evaluation of novel choices by simultaneous representation of multiple memories , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[44]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Neural signature of the conscious processing of auditory regularities , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.