A study on the effects of thermal, luminous, and acoustic environments on indoor environmental comfort in offices

Abstract In light of growing concerns about productivity, much more attention has focused on the indoor environment in offices in recent years. Standards typically address different environmental factors such as thermal comfort, indoor air quality, and aural and visual environments separately. In fact, these environmental factors have notable combined effects on occupants’ acceptability and work performance. ASHRAE Guideline 10P emphasized the interactions among indoor environmental factors and recommended that more detailed research is conducted. In this study, a controlled field survey was carried out to investigate the acceptable range of every individual environmental factor as well as the cumulative effects of multiple factors on indoor environmental quality. In the survey, the parameters of thermal, luminous, and acoustic environments were measured and subjects’ satisfaction levels with regard to the indoor environment were determined using questionnaires. The results show that the satisfaction levels of both temperature and noise have one-vote veto power over the satisfaction level of the indoor environment as a whole. In addition, the interactions among different factors were examined through chart analysis to classify indoor environmental quality.

[1]  Ralph F. Goldman,et al.  Extrapolating ASHRAE's Comfort Model , 1999 .

[2]  L. T. Wong,et al.  A method of assessing the acceptability of noise levels in air-conditioned offices , 2006 .

[3]  Paulo Henrique Trombetta Zannin,et al.  Acoustic, thermal and luminous comfort in classrooms , 2004 .

[4]  Daniel Västfjäll,et al.  In search of the comfortable indoor environment : A comparison of the utility of objective and subjective indicators of indoor comfort , 2007 .

[5]  Philomena M. Bluyssen,et al.  Management of the Indoor Environment: from a Component Related to an Interactive Top-down Approach , 2008 .

[6]  Standard Ashrae Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy , 1992 .

[7]  M. Mendell,et al.  Indices for IEQ and building-related symptoms. , 2003, Indoor air.

[8]  Tetsumi Horikoshi,et al.  New comfort index during combined conditions of moderate low ambient temperature and traffic noise , 2005 .

[9]  P. Fanger Moderate Thermal Environments Determination of the PMV and PPD Indices and Specification of the Conditions for Thermal Comfort , 1984 .

[10]  L. T. Wong,et al.  An evaluation model for indoor environmental quality (IEQ) acceptance in residential buildings , 2009 .

[11]  Geo Clausen,et al.  The Combined Effects of Many Different Indoor Environmental Factors on Acceptability and Office Work Performance , 2008 .

[12]  V. Candas,et al.  Effects of steady-state noise and temperature conditions on environmental perception and acceptability. , 2004, Indoor air.

[13]  L. T. Wong,et al.  A multivariate-logistic model for acceptance of indoor environmental quality (IEQ) in offices , 2008 .

[14]  Fariborz Haghighat,et al.  IMPACT OF PSYCHO-SOCIAL FACTORS ON PERCEPTION OF THE INDOOR AIR ENVIRONMENT STUDIES IN 12 OFFICE BUILDINGS , 1999 .

[15]  Duan Xi-chao Multi-hierarchial Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method of Indoor Environment , 2007 .

[16]  Michael A. Humphreys,et al.  Quantifying occupant comfort: are combined indices of the indoor environment practicable? , 2005 .