Gene perturbation and intervention in context-sensitive stochastic Boolean networks

BackgroundIn a gene regulatory network (GRN), gene expressions are affected by noise, and stochastic fluctuations exist in the interactions among genes. These stochastic interactions are context dependent, thus it becomes important to consider noise in a context-sensitive manner in a network model. As a logical model, context-sensitive probabilistic Boolean networks (CSPBNs) account for molecular and genetic noise in the temporal context of gene functions. In a CSPBN with n genes and k contexts, however, a computational complexity of O(nk222n) (or O(nk 2n)) is required for an accurate (or approximate) computation of the state transition matrix (STM) of the size (2n ∙ k) × (2n ∙ k) (or 2n × 2n). The evaluation of a steady state distribution (SSD) is more challenging. Recently, stochastic Boolean networks (SBNs) have been proposed as an efficient implementation of an instantaneous PBN.ResultsThe notion of stochastic Boolean networks (SBNs) is extended for the general model of PBNs, i.e., CSPBNs. This yields a novel structure of context-sensitive SBNs (CSSBNs) for modeling the stochasticity in a GRN. A CSSBN enables an efficient simulation of a CSPBN with a complexity of O(nLk 2n) for computing the state transition matrix, where L is a factor related to the required sequence length in CSSBN for achieving a desired accuracy. A time-frame expanded CSSBN can further efficiently simulate the stationary behavior of a CSPBN and allow for a tunable tradeoff between accuracy and efficiency. The CSSBN approach is more efficient than an analytical method and more accurate than an approximate analysis.ConclusionsContext-sensitive stochastic Boolean networks (CSSBNs) are proposed as an efficient approach to modeling the effects of gene perturbation and intervention in gene regulatory networks. A CSSBN analysis provides biologically meaningful insights into the oscillatory dynamics of the p53-Mdm2 network in a context-switching environment. It is shown that random gene perturbation has a greater effect on the final distribution of the steady state of a network compared to context switching activities. The CSSBN approach can further predict the steady state distribution of a glioma network under gene intervention. Ultimately, this will help drug discovery and develop effective drug intervention strategies.

[1]  Ranadip Pal,et al.  Context-Sensitive Probabilistic Boolean Networks: Steady-State Properties, Reduction, and Steady-State Approximation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[2]  D. Gillespie A General Method for Numerically Simulating the Stochastic Time Evolution of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1976 .

[3]  Aniruddha Datta,et al.  External Control in Markovian Genetic Regulatory Networks , 2004, Machine Learning.

[4]  Jie Han,et al.  Stochastic Boolean networks: An efficient approach to modeling gene regulatory networks , 2012, BMC Systems Biology.

[5]  A. Levine,et al.  Surfing the p53 network , 2000, Nature.

[6]  E. Shapiro,et al.  An autonomous molecular computer for logical control of gene expression , 2004, Nature.

[7]  Reiner A. Veitia,et al.  On gene dosage balance in protein complexes: a comment on Semple JI, Vavouri T, Lehner B. A simple principle concerning the robustness of protein complex activity to changes in gene expression. , 2009, BMC Systems Biology.

[8]  Clare E. Giacomantonio,et al.  A Boolean Model of the Gene Regulatory Network Underlying Mammalian Cortical Area Development , 2010, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[9]  Edward R. Dougherty,et al.  Intervention in gene regulatory networks via greedy control policies based on long-run behavior , 2009, BMC Systems Biology.

[10]  Edward R. Dougherty,et al.  Steady-state probabilities for attractors in probabilistic Boolean networks , 2005, Signal Process..

[11]  Hao Chen,et al.  A Stochastic Computational Approach for Accurate and Efficient Reliability Evaluation , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[12]  Galit Lahav,et al.  The ups and downs of p53: understanding protein dynamics in single cells , 2009, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[13]  M. Kaufman,et al.  From structure to dynamics: frequency tuning in the p53-Mdm2 network I. Logical approach. , 2009, Journal of theoretical biology.

[14]  Jeffrey W. Smith,et al.  Stochastic Gene Expression in a Single Cell , .

[15]  Edward R. Dougherty,et al.  Inference of Noisy Nonlinear Differential Equation Models for Gene Regulatory Networks Using Genetic Programming and Kalman Filtering , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[16]  W. Yung,et al.  Reactivation of insulin-like growth factor binding protein 2 expression in glioblastoma multiforme: a revelation by parallel gene expression profiling. , 1999, Cancer research.

[17]  D. Gillespie Exact Stochastic Simulation of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1977 .

[18]  Aniruddha Datta,et al.  Optimal infinite horizon control for probabilistic Boolean networks , 2006, 2006 American Control Conference.

[19]  Aniruddha Datta,et al.  Intervention in Context-Sensitive Probabilistic Boolean Networks Revisited , 2009, EURASIP J. Bioinform. Syst. Biol..

[20]  Aniruddha Datta,et al.  External control in Markovian genetic regulatory networks: the imperfect information case , 2004, Bioinform..

[21]  A. Abdi,et al.  Fault Diagnosis Engineering of Digital Circuits Can Identify Vulnerable Molecules in Complex Cellular Pathways , 2008, Science Signaling.

[22]  Edward R. Dougherty,et al.  Effect of Function Perturbation on the Steady-State Distribution of Genetic Regulatory Networks: Optimal Structural Intervention , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[23]  J. Rosenthal Minorization Conditions and Convergence Rates for Markov Chain Monte Carlo , 1995 .

[24]  A. Datta,et al.  On approximate stochastic control in genetic regulatory networks. , 2007, IET systems biology.

[25]  Michael K. Ng,et al.  Simulation study in Probabilistic Boolean Network models for genetic regulatory networks , 2007, Int. J. Data Min. Bioinform..

[26]  Michael K. Ng,et al.  An approximation method for solving the steady-state probability distribution of probabilistic Boolean networks , 2007, Bioinform..

[27]  H. McAdams,et al.  Circuit simulation of genetic networks. , 1995, Science.

[28]  Naftali Tishby,et al.  Stochastic computing with biomolecular automata , 2004, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[29]  Jean-Loup Faulon,et al.  Boolean dynamics of genetic regulatory networks inferred from microarray time series data , 2007, Bioinform..

[30]  A. van Oudenaarden,et al.  Noise Propagation in Gene Networks , 2005, Science.

[31]  Jie Han,et al.  Asynchronous Stochastic Boolean Networks as Gene Network Models , 2014, J. Comput. Biol..

[32]  Seda Arat,et al.  Modeling stochasticity and variability in gene regulatory networks , 2012, EURASIP J. Bioinform. Syst. Biol..

[33]  BMC Systems Biology , 2007 .

[34]  E. Dougherty,et al.  Gene perturbation and intervention in probabilistic Boolean networks. , 2002, Bioinformatics.

[35]  Uri Alon,et al.  Dynamics of the p53-Mdm2 feedback loop in individual cells , 2004, Nature Genetics.

[36]  Aniruddha Datta,et al.  Intervention in context-sensitive probabilistic Boolean networks , 2005, Bioinform..

[37]  Sui Huang Gene expression profiling, genetic networks, and cellular states: an integrating concept for tumorigenesis and drug discovery , 1999, Journal of Molecular Medicine.

[38]  Edward R. Dougherty,et al.  Steady-State Analysis of Genetic Regulatory Networks Modelled by Probabilistic Boolean Networks , 2003, Comparative and functional genomics.

[39]  J. Levine,et al.  Surfing the p53 network , 2000, Nature.

[40]  S. Kauffman Metabolic stability and epigenesis in randomly constructed genetic nets. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.

[41]  M. Elowitz,et al.  Regulatory activity revealed by dynamic correlations in gene expression noise , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[42]  R. Weinberg,et al.  The Biology of Cancer , 2006 .

[43]  Edward R. Dougherty,et al.  Probabilistic Boolean Networks - The Modeling and Control of Gene Regulatory Networks , 2010 .

[44]  Hao Ge,et al.  Boolean Network Approach to Negative Feedback Loops of the p53 Pathways: Synchronized Dynamics and Stochastic Limit Cycles , 2009, J. Comput. Biol..

[45]  Peican Zhu,et al.  Stochastic Multiple-Valued Gene Networks , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems.

[46]  Aniruddha Datta,et al.  Adaptive intervention in Probabilistic Boolean Networks , 2009, 2009 American Control Conference.

[47]  Axel Kowald,et al.  Systems Biology in Practice: Concepts, Implementation and Application , 2005 .

[48]  Andrea Ciliberto,et al.  Steady States and Oscillations in the p53/Mdm2 Network , 2005, Cell cycle.

[49]  Brian R. Gaines,et al.  Stochastic Computing Systems , 1969 .

[50]  S. Bornholdt,et al.  Boolean Network Model Predicts Cell Cycle Sequence of Fission Yeast , 2007, PloS one.

[51]  Edward R. Dougherty,et al.  From Boolean to probabilistic Boolean networks as models of genetic regulatory networks , 2002, Proc. IEEE.