Students’ Conceptions of Quantum Physics

…after people read the paper a lot of people understood the theory of relativity in some way or other, certainly more than twelve. On the other hand, I think I can safely say that no one understands quantum mechanics….do not keep saying to yourself, if you possibly can avoid is, ‘But how can it be like that?’ because you will get “down the drain”, into a blind alley from which nobody has yet escaped. nobody knows how it can be like that (Feynmann, 1967, p. 129). Particularly over the last fifteen years there has been considerable research interest in the student’s perceptions of phenomena in such areas as energy, motion, the particulate nature of matter, electricity, and light. However, ninety years after the genesis of quantum physics significant research on students’ understanding of such revolutionary phenomena is only beginning to emerge. This new study is designed to build on and complement previous work carried out principally by research groups in Bremen, Berlin and Valencia. The aim of the Students’ Conceptions of Quantum Physics Project is to elicit students’ conceptions of quantum phenomena, investigate their use of metaphors and analogies in constructing conceptual models, and evaluate the efficacy of the incorporation of quantum physics at the pre-university level. The study should lead to more effective teaching and learning strategies, and inform policy and curriculum decision-making.

[1]  J. Gilbert,et al.  Explanation and metaphor: Some empirical questions in science education , 1983 .

[2]  Ej Wood European journal of science education , 1979 .

[3]  C. Sutton,et al.  Words, Science and Learning , 1992 .

[4]  R. Feynman The Character of Physical Law , 1965 .

[5]  Daniel Gil,et al.  The introduction of modern physics: overcoming a deformed vision of science , 1993 .

[6]  K. Popper,et al.  Conjectures and Refutations , 1963 .

[7]  Roger Muncaster,et al.  A-Level Physics , 1981 .

[8]  John K. Gilbert,et al.  Concepts, Misconceptions and Alternative Conceptions: Changing Perspectives in Science Education , 1983 .

[9]  John K. Gilbert,et al.  A technique for exploring students' views of the world , 1980 .

[10]  D. Morgan,et al.  Sociological Paradigms and Organizational Analysis. , 1983 .

[11]  Rom Harré,et al.  Theories and things , 1961 .

[12]  Helmut Fischler,et al.  Modern physics and students' conceptions , 1992 .

[13]  R. Kidd,et al.  Evolution of the modern photon , 1989 .

[14]  Beverley Bell,et al.  Students' Thinking and the Learning of Science: A Constructivist View. , 1986 .

[15]  R. Driver Pupils’ Alternative Frameworks in Science , 1981 .

[16]  G. Erickson Children's conceptions of heat and temperature , 1979 .

[17]  B. Andersson,et al.  The experiential gestalt of causation: a common core to pupils’ preconceptions in science , 1986 .

[18]  Arthur Fine,et al.  The shaky game , 1986 .

[19]  A. Raczyński,et al.  Symposium on the foundations of modern physics : edited by P. Lahti and P. Mittelstaedt, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Singapore 1985 , 1986 .

[20]  Michael Shayer,et al.  Towards a science of science teaching : cognitive development and curriculum demand , 1981 .

[21]  R. Lehrman Confused physics: A tutorial critique , 1982 .