Expansion load: recessive mutations and the role of standing genetic variation

Expanding populations incur a mutation burden – the so‐called expansion load. Previous studies of expansion load have focused on codominant mutations. An important consequence of this assumption is that expansion load stems exclusively from the accumulation of new mutations occurring in individuals living at the wave front. Using individual‐based simulations, we study here the dynamics of standing genetic variation at the front of expansions, and its consequences on mean fitness if mutations are recessive. We find that deleterious genetic diversity is quickly lost at the front of the expansion, but the loss of deleterious mutations at some loci is compensated by an increase of their frequencies at other loci. The frequency of deleterious homozygotes therefore increases along the expansion axis, whereas the average number of deleterious mutations per individual remains nearly constant across the species range. This reveals two important differences to codominant models: (i) mean fitness at the front of the expansion drops much faster if mutations are recessive, and (ii) mutation load can increase during the expansion even if the total number of deleterious mutations per individual remains constant. We use our model to make predictions about the shape of the site frequency spectrum at the front of range expansion, and about correlations between heterozygosity and fitness in different parts of the species range. Importantly, these predictions provide opportunities to empirically validate our theoretical results. We discuss our findings in the light of recent results on the distribution of deleterious genetic variation across human populations and link them to empirical results on the correlation of heterozygosity and fitness found in many natural range expansions.

[1]  D. Reich,et al.  Response to a population bottleneck can be used to infer recessive selection , 2013, bioRxiv.

[2]  M. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Expansion Load and the Evolutionary Dynamics of a Species Range , 2015, The American Naturalist.

[3]  Karin Johst,et al.  Deleterious mutations can surf to high densities on the wave front of an expanding population. , 2007, Molecular biology and evolution.

[4]  J. Pritchard,et al.  The deleterious mutation load is insensitive to recent population history , 2013, Nature Genetics.

[5]  N. Morton,et al.  AN ESTIMATE OF THE MUTATIONAL DAMAGE IN MAN FROM DATA ON CONSANGUINEOUS MARRIAGES. , 1956, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  D. Reich,et al.  No evidence that selection has been less effective at removing deleterious mutations in Europeans than in Africans , 2014, Nature Genetics.

[7]  When is selection effective? , 2014 .

[8]  P. Keightley,et al.  A Resolution of the Mutation Load Paradox in Humans , 2012, Genetics.

[9]  S. Gravel When Is Selection Effective? , 2014, Genetics.

[10]  L. Excoffier,et al.  Genetic Consequences of Range Expansions , 2009 .

[11]  P. Keightley,et al.  Joint Inference of the Distribution of Fitness Effects of Deleterious Mutations and Population Demography Based on Nucleotide Polymorphism Frequencies , 2007, Genetics.

[12]  D. Boomsma,et al.  Regular Exercise, Subjective Wellbeing, and Internalizing Problems in Adolescence: Causality or Genetic Pleiotropy? , 2012, Front. Gene..

[13]  D. Harris,et al.  Surfing in tortoises? Empirical signs of genetic structuring owing to range expansion , 2013, Biology Letters.

[14]  Richard Shine,et al.  Invasion and the evolution of speed in toads , 2006, Nature.

[15]  M. Kirkpatrick,et al.  On the accumulation of deleterious mutations during range expansions. , 2013, Molecular ecology.

[16]  D. R. Taylor,et al.  Recent admixture generates heterozygosity–fitness correlations during the range expansion of an invading species , 2014, Journal of evolutionary biology.

[17]  Lionel Roques,et al.  Allee effect promotes diversity in traveling waves of colonization , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  J. Darling,et al.  How important is intraspecific genetic admixture to the success of colonising populations? , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[19]  M. Whitlock,et al.  Inferences About the Distribution of Dominance Drawn From Yeast Gene Knockout Data , 2011, Genetics.

[20]  J. Travis,et al.  The Frequency of Fitness Peak Shifts Is Increased at Expanding Range Margins Due to Mutation Surfing , 2008, Genetics.

[21]  P. Keightley,et al.  A Comparison of Models to Infer the Distribution of Fitness Effects of New Mutations , 2013, Genetics.

[22]  S. Subramanian The Abundance of Deleterious Polymorphisms in Humans , 2012, Genetics.

[23]  M. Bamshad,et al.  Characteristics of neutral and deleterious protein-coding variation among individuals and populations. , 2014, American journal of human genetics.

[24]  P. David,et al.  HETEROZYGOSITY‐FITNESS CORRELATIONS: A TIME FOR REAPPRAISAL , 2010, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[25]  J. R. Chapman,et al.  A quantitative review of heterozygosity–fitness correlations in animal populations , 2009, Molecular ecology.

[26]  Gregory P. Brown,et al.  Rapid shifts in dispersal behavior on an expanding range edge , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Kirk E Lohmueller,et al.  The distribution of deleterious genetic variation in human populations. , 2014, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[28]  R. Beverton,et al.  On the dynamics of exploited fish populations , 1993, Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries.

[29]  N. Yasuda,et al.  Genetic uniformity and long‐distance clonal dispersal in the invasive androgenetic Corbicula clams , 2014, Molecular ecology.

[30]  Christopher A. Edmonds,et al.  Mutations arising in the wave front of an expanding population. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  D. Hartl,et al.  Directional selection and the site-frequency spectrum. , 2001, Genetics.

[32]  P. Smiseth,et al.  Complex Effects of Inbreeding on Biparental Cooperation , 2014, The American Naturalist.

[33]  S. Wright THE GENETICAL THEORY OF NATURAL SELECTIONA Review , 1930 .

[34]  B. Wallace HARD AND SOFT SELECTION REVISITED , 1975, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[35]  Patrick J. McIntyre,et al.  Evolution and Ecology of Species Range Limits , 2009 .

[36]  Ryan D. Hernandez,et al.  Assessing the Evolutionary Impact of Amino Acid Mutations in the Human Genome , 2008, PLoS genetics.

[37]  Fernando Racimo,et al.  Approximation to the Distribution of Fitness Effects across Functional Categories in Human Segregating Polymorphisms , 2014, bioRxiv.

[38]  L. Excoffier,et al.  Serial Founder Effects During Range Expansion: A Spatial Analog of Genetic Drift , 2012, Genetics.

[39]  Luca Peliti,et al.  The Rate of Beneficial Mutations Surfing on the Wave of a Range Expansion , 2011, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[40]  F. THE MUTATION LOAD IN SMALL POPULATIONS , 2022 .

[41]  R. Green The influence of numbers released on the outcome of attempts to introduce exotic bird species to New Zealand , 1997 .

[42]  M. Kirkpatrick,et al.  The Effects of a Bottleneck on Inbreeding Depression and the Genetic Load , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[43]  Oskar Hallatschek,et al.  Gene surfing in expanding populations. , 2007, Theoretical population biology.

[44]  J. Crow,et al.  Mutation rate and dominance of genes affecting viability in Drosophila melanogaster. , 1972, Genetics.

[45]  F. David,et al.  On the Dynamics of Exploited Fish Populations , 1959, Fish & Fisheries Series.

[46]  A. Caballero,et al.  On the average coefficient of dominance of deleterious spontaneous mutations. , 2000, Genetics.

[47]  Gregory P. Brown,et al.  An evolutionary process that assembles phenotypes through space rather than through time , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  Laurent Excoffier,et al.  Deep Human Genealogies Reveal a Selective Advantage to Be on an Expanding Wave Front , 2011, Science.

[49]  Seraina Klopfstein,et al.  The fate of mutations surfing on the wave of a range expansion. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.

[50]  Vikas Bansal,et al.  Clinical Implications of Human Population Differences in Genome-Wide Rates of Functional Genotypes , 2012, Front. Gene..

[51]  M. Kimura,et al.  The Stepping Stone Model of Population Structure and the Decrease of Genetic Correlation with Distance. , 1964, Genetics.

[52]  A. Gray,et al.  I. THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES BY MEANS OF NATURAL SELECTION , 1963 .

[53]  R. Macarthur Mathematical Ecology and Its Place among the Sciences. (Book Reviews: Geographical Ecology. Patterns in the Distribution of Species) , 1974 .

[54]  Richard Shine,et al.  Life-history evolution in range-shifting populations. , 2010, Ecology.

[55]  Alan Hastings,et al.  Allee effects in biological invasions , 2005 .

[56]  L. Excoffier,et al.  Impact of range expansions on current human genomic diversity. , 2014, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[57]  Ryan D. Hernandez,et al.  Proportionally more deleterious genetic variation in European than in African populations , 2008, Nature.

[58]  A. D. Peters,et al.  Dominance and overdominance of mildly deleterious induced mutations for fitness traits in Caenorhabditis elegans. , 2003, Genetics.