Spatial Attention Enhances the Neural Representation of Invisible Signals Embedded in Noise

Recent evidence suggests that voluntary spatial attention can modulate neural representations of visual stimuli that do not enter conscious awareness (i.e. invisible stimuli), supporting the notion that attention and awareness are dissociable processes (Watanabe et al., 2011; Wyart et al., 2012a). It remains unclear, however, whether spatial attention can modulate neural representations of invisible stimuli that are in direct competition with highly salient and visible stimuli. Here we developed a novel electroencephalography (EEG) frequency-tagging paradigm to obtain a continuous readout of neural activity associated with visible and invisible signals embedded in dynamic noise. Participants (N = 23) detected occasional contrast changes in one of two flickering image streams on either side of fixation. Each image stream contained a visible or invisible signal embedded in every second noise image, the visibility of which was titrated and checked using a two-interval forced-choice detection task. Steady-state visual-evoked potentials (SSVEPs) were computed from EEG data at the signal and noise frequencies of interest. Cluster-based permutation analyses revealed significant neural responses to both visible and invisible signals across posterior scalp electrodes. In line with previous findings, spatial attention increased the neural representation of visible signals. Crucially, spatial attention also increased the neural representation of invisible signals. As such, the present results replicate and extend previous studies by demonstrating that attention can modulate the neural representation of invisible signals that are in direct competition with highly salient masking stimuli. Significance Statement There has been much debate about the extent to which attention can effect neural representations of stimuli that do not enter conscious awareness. It remains unclear, however, whether spatial attention can modulate representations of invisible stimuli that are in direct spatial and temporal competition with salient masking stimuli. We developed a novel paradigm that for the first time allowed us to measure weak neural representations of invisible stimuli embedded in spatially coincident noise, and tested the effect of spatial attention on these representations. We found that spatial attention enhanced the neural representation of invisible stimuli, demonstrating that competition with highly salient stimuli does not suppress the effects of spatial attention on weak neural representations of invisible stimuli.

[1]  David M. Groppe,et al.  Mass univariate analysis of event-related brain potentials/fields I: a critical tutorial review. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[2]  Christof Koch,et al.  Attention and consciousness: related yet different , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[3]  A. Cichocki,et al.  Steady-state visually evoked potentials: Focus on essential paradigms and future perspectives , 2010, Progress in Neurobiology.

[4]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[5]  Michael X Cohen,et al.  Analyzing Neural Time Series Data: Theory and Practice , 2014 .

[6]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Effects of spatial selective attention on the steady-state visual evoked potential in the 20-28 Hz range. , 1998, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[7]  Yusuke Murayama,et al.  Attention But Not Awareness Modulates the BOLD Signal in the Human V1 During Binocular Suppression , 2011, Science.

[8]  G. Glover,et al.  Retinotopic organization in human visual cortex and the spatial precision of functional MRI. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[9]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  The Role of the Medial Frontal Cortex in Cognitive Control , 2004, Science.

[10]  R. Desimone,et al.  Competitive Mechanisms Subserve Attention in Macaque Areas V2 and V4 , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  The attentional requirements of consciousness , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  Christopher Summerfield,et al.  Dissociable prior influences of signal probability and relevance on visual contrast sensitivity , 2011 .

[13]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  An objective method for measuring face detection thresholds using the sweep steady-state visual evoked response. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[14]  J W Belliveau,et al.  Borders of multiple visual areas in humans revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 1995, Science.

[15]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Involvement of striate and extrastriate visual cortical areas in spatial attention , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  C. Frith,et al.  Shifting baselines in attention research , 2000, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[18]  J. Changeux,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.10 No.5 May 2006 Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: a testable taxonomy , 2022 .

[19]  J. Prinz The Conscious Brain , 2012 .

[20]  Justin M. Ales,et al.  The steady-state visual evoked potential in vision research: A review. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[21]  D. Broadbent Perception and communication , 1958 .

[22]  Julie M. Harris,et al.  Optimal integration of shading and binocular disparity for depth perception. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[23]  Catherine Tallon-Baudry,et al.  Early dissociation between neural signatures of endogenous spatial attention and perceptual awareness during visual masking , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[24]  Catherine Tallon-Baudry,et al.  On the Neural Mechanisms Subserving Consciousness and Attention , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[25]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[26]  A. Watson,et al.  Quest: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method , 1983, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  Diane M. Beck,et al.  Top-down and bottom-up mechanisms in biasing competition in the human brain , 2009, Vision Research.

[28]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[29]  T. Womelsdorf,et al.  Long-Range Attention Networks: Circuit Motifs Underlying Endogenously Controlled Stimulus Selection , 2015, Trends in Neurosciences.

[30]  Catherine Tallon-Baudry,et al.  Distinct and independent correlates of attention and awareness in a hemianopic patient , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  J. Prinz The Conscious Brain: How Attention Engenders Experience , 2012 .

[32]  C. Tallon-Baudry,et al.  Neural Dissociation between Visual Awareness and Spatial Attention , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  C. Koch,et al.  Attention and consciousness: two distinct brain processes , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[34]  D. Regan Some characteristics of average steady-state and transient responses evoked by modulated light. , 1966, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.