The Effects of Interdistracter Similarity on Search Processes in Superior Parietal Cortex

The superior parietal lobe has been associated with the spatial integration of visual features, an important step in the detection of particular form conjunctions. However, behavioral research has indicated that when target items can be segmented from neighboring distracters via similarity grouping, detection may not rely on spatial integration. The question therefore arises as to whether the superior parietal cortex is an integral component of conjunction search or only important in the absence of certain grouping relations. Here, we acquired measures of reaction time and event-related fMRI, while subjects searched for conjunction targets in displays containing either homogeneous or heterogeneous distracters. We confirm that under conditions of low distracter similarity, search involves parietal-motor areas associated with spatial selection. However, we also demonstrate that under conditions of high distracter similarity, search is instead associated with activation of right temporal-parietal cortex. These results suggest that the superior parietal cortex is not a necessary component of visual conjunction search and highlight a new role for the right temporal-parietal cortex in perceptual grouping.

[1]  M. V. Kleeck Hemispheric differences in global versus local processing of hierarchical visual stimuli by normal subjects: New data and a meta-analysis of previous studies , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[2]  S. Dubé,et al.  Local and global factors of similarity in visual search , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  Stephen M. Kosslyn,et al.  Gestalt laws of perceptual organization in an embedded figures task: Evidence for hemispheric specialization , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[4]  A. Treisman,et al.  Parietal contributions to visual feature binding: evidence from a patient with bilateral lesions , 1995, Science.

[5]  S. Yantis,et al.  Mechanisms of attentional priority. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[7]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Superior Parietal Cortex Activation During Spatial Attention Shifts and Visual Feature Conjunction , 1995, Science.

[8]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[9]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Functional localization of the system for visuospatial attention using positron emission tomography. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[10]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Human cortical mechanisms of visual attention during orienting and search. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[11]  D. G. Cogan Visuospatial dysgnosia. , 1979, American journal of ophthalmology.

[12]  A Treisman,et al.  Feature binding, attention and object perception. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[13]  R. Knight,et al.  Component mechanisms underlying the processing of hierarchically organized patterns: inferences from patients with unilateral cortical lesions. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[14]  J. Bradshaw,et al.  The nature of hemispheric specialization in man , 1981, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[15]  W. Ritchie Russell,et al.  Dissociated visual perceptual and spatial deficits in focal lesions of the right hemisphere , 1969 .

[16]  F. J. Friedrich,et al.  Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[17]  R. Rafal,et al.  Attention and Feature Integration: Illusory Conjunctions in a Patient with a Parietal Lobe Lesion , 1991 .

[18]  C. Frith,et al.  Cerebral representations for egocentric space: functional-anatomical evidence from caloric vestibular stimulation and neck vibration , 2001, NeuroImage.

[19]  G. Holmes DISTURBANCES OF VISUAL ORIENTATION , 1918, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[20]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Grouping processes in visual search: Effects with single- and combined-feature targets , 1989 .

[21]  R. Rafal,et al.  Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[22]  M. Corbetta,et al.  A PET study of visuospatial attention , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[23]  R Klein,et al.  Search performance without eye movements , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  A. Villringer,et al.  Involvement of the human frontal eye field and multiple parietal areas in covert visual selection during conjunction search , 2000, The European journal of neuroscience.

[25]  A. Treisman Solutions to the Binding Problem Progress through Controversy and Convergence , 1999, Neuron.

[26]  G W Humphreys,et al.  Grouping processes in visual search: effects with single- and combined-feature targets. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[27]  Refractor Vision , 2000, The Lancet.

[28]  Lynn C. Robertson,et al.  The neurology of visual attention. , 1995 .

[29]  A. Nobre,et al.  The Large-Scale Neural Network for Spatial Attention Displays Multifunctional Overlap But Differential Asymmetry , 1999, NeuroImage.

[30]  M M Mesulam,et al.  Large‐scale neurocognitive networks and distributed processing for attention, language, and memory , 1990, Annals of neurology.

[31]  M. Gazzaniga Handbook of Cognitive Neuroscience , 1984, Springer US.

[32]  F. J. Friedrich,et al.  Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of visual attention , 1984 .

[33]  M Corbetta,et al.  Frontoparietal cortical networks for directing attention and the eye to visual locations: identical, independent, or overlapping neural systems? , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  J. Gore,et al.  A Stimulus-Driven Approach to Object Identity and Location Processing in the Human Brain , 2000, Neuron.

[35]  S. Leehey,et al.  Lateral asymmetries in the recognition of words, familiar faces and unfamiliar faces , 1979, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  A. Treisman,et al.  The Interaction of Spatial and Object Pathways: Evidence from Balint's Syndrome , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[37]  R. Nebes,et al.  Patterns of Hand Preference in a Student Population , 1975, Cortex.

[38]  Jeremy M Wolfe,et al.  Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[39]  A. Nobre,et al.  Where and When to Pay Attention: The Neural Systems for Directing Attention to Spatial Locations and to Time Intervals as Revealed by Both PET and fMRI , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  D. N. Pandya,et al.  Further observations on parieto-temporal connections in the rhesus monkey , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[41]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Search via recursive rejection (SERR): visual search for single and dual form-conjunction targets. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[42]  E. Renzi Disorders of space exploration and cognition , 1982 .

[43]  R. Desimone,et al.  The Role of Neural Mechanisms of Attention in Solving the Binding Problem , 1999, Neuron.

[44]  Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al.  Just Say No: How Are Visual Searches Terminated When There Is No Target Present? , 1996, Cognitive Psychology.

[45]  James T. Townsend,et al.  The Stochastic Modeling of Elementary Psychological Processes , 1983 .

[46]  A. Treisman Features and Objects: The Fourteenth Bartlett Memorial Lecture , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[47]  Alan Cowey,et al.  Temporal aspects of visual search studied by transcranial magnetic stimulation , 1997, Neuropsychologia.

[48]  A. Treisman,et al.  Conjunction search revisited. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[49]  H. Pashler,et al.  Detecting conjunctions of color and form: Reassessing the serial search hypothesis , 1987, Perception & psychophysics.

[50]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Uniform connectedness and classical gestalt principles of perceptual grouping , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[51]  L. Robertson,et al.  Effects of lesions of temporal-parietal junction on perceptual and attentional processing in humans , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[52]  T. P. S. Powell,et al.  The cortico-cortical connections within the parieto-temporal lobe of area PG, 7a, in the monkey , 1988, Brain Research.

[53]  D. Perani,et al.  The anatomy of unilateral neglect after right-hemisphere stroke lesions. A clinical/CT-scan correlation study in man , 1986, Neuropsychologia.

[54]  A. Neuren Visual Agnosia , 1991, Neurology.

[55]  M. Posner The Brain and Emotion , 1999, Nature Medicine.

[56]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.