Real-Time 6DoF Guidance For of Spacecraft Proximity Maneuvering and Close Approach with a Tumbling Object

This paper deals with the development of a six degree of freedom guidance laws for the 20-state rendezvous model of two spacecraft, one of which is controlled and another considered to be passively tumbling. Solutions that minimize a series of performance indices are obtained for the problem of close approach, up to the point of contact. The method for spacecraft reorientation is developed based on a quaternion parameterization within the frame of the Inverse Dynamics in the Virtual Domain method. This proven approach for rapid trajectory generation exploits the concept of decoupling space and time. The advantages of the new full degreed of freedom guidance generation technique are demonstrated through simulated scenarios that employ two distinct concepts of closed-loop feedback with realistic settings and Monte Carlo simulations to assure algorithm performance while varying initial conditions.

[1]  Yoshiaki Ohkami,et al.  FLY-BY APPROACH AND GUIDANCE FOR UNCONTROLLED ROTATING SATELITE CAPTURE , 2003 .

[2]  Anil V. Rao,et al.  Optimal Reconfiguration of Spacecraft Formations Using the Gauss Pseudospectral Method , 2008 .

[3]  Nathan Slegers,et al.  Optimal Control for Terminal Guidance of Autonomous Parafoils , 2009 .

[4]  D. Vallado Fundamentals of Astrodynamics and Applications , 1997 .

[5]  O. Yakimenko Direct Method for Rapid Prototyping of Near-Optimal Aircraft Trajectories , 2000 .

[6]  Chi Zhu,et al.  Planning of Safe Kinematic Trajectories for Free Flying Robots Approaching an Uncontrolled Spinning Satellite , 2002 .

[7]  George A. Boyarko,et al.  Formulation and Analysis of Matching Points of Interest in Two-Spacecraft for Optimal Rendezvous , 2009 .

[8]  Banavara N. Shashikanth,et al.  Optimal approach to and alignment with a rotating rigid body for capture , 2007 .

[9]  Oleg A. Yakimenko,et al.  Computing short-time aircraft maneuvers using direct methods , 2010 .

[10]  Geoffrey T. Huntington,et al.  Comparison of Global and Local Collocation Methods for Optimal Control , 2008 .

[11]  Robert M. Sanner,et al.  Variational Technique for Spacecraft Trajectory Planning , 2010 .

[12]  F. Y. Hadaegh,et al.  COLLISION AVOIDANCE GUIDANCE FOR FORMATION-FLYING APPLICATIONS , 2001 .

[13]  I. Michael Ross,et al.  Real-Time Computation of Neighboring Optimal Control Laws , 2002 .

[14]  C. D. McFarland,et al.  Near Real-Time Closed-Loop Optimal Control Feedback for Spacecraft Attitude Maneuvers , 2012 .

[15]  Xiaoping Yun,et al.  Autonomous Distributed Control Algorithm for Multiple Spacecraft in Close Proximity Operations , 2007 .

[16]  Stephen K. Jacobsen,et al.  Approach Planning and Guidance for Uncontrolled Rotating Satellite Capture Considering Collision Avoidance , 2003 .

[17]  Robert B. Friend,et al.  Orbital Express program summary and mission overview , 2008, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[18]  Thomas Davis,et al.  XSS-10 Micro-Satellite Flight Demonstration Program , 2003 .

[19]  George A. Boyarko,et al.  Time-optimal reorientation of a spacecraft using a direct optimization method based on inverse dynamics , 2010, 2010 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[20]  Albert Bosse,et al.  SUMO: spacecraft for the universal modification of orbits , 2004, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.