A Tangible, Story-Construction Process Employing Spatial, Computational-Thinking

The outcome of a multidisciplinary and iterative process, CyberPLAYce is a tangible, interactive, cyber-physical learning tool for children supporting computational thinking and, particularly, playful storytelling. CyberPLAYce finds inspiration in the concept of child-computer interaction, where meaning is constructed through spatially reconfiguring the physical environment. The novel aspect of CyberPLAYce is its extension of cyber-learning to the dimension of space where children construct meaning at a larger physical scale. This paper outlines the motivations for CyberPLAYce, focuses on the full arc of design and evaluation activities concerning computational thinking (CT) practices that engaged 8-12-year-old storytellers, and concludes with a consideration of future work focusing on spatial thinking with CyberPLAYce. Results from our empirical study suggest that cyber-physical play afforded by CyberPLAYce scaffolds computational thinking, creating, and sharing in children. Particularly for IDC researchers in the educational domain, CyberPLAYce represents a Research-through-design exemplar supporting children's enjoyment of learning and meaning-construction.

[1]  Dave Baum,et al.  Definitive Guide to Lego Mindstorms , 2002 .

[2]  Justine Cassell,et al.  Making Space for Voice: Technologies to Support Children’s Fantasy and Storytelling , 2001, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[3]  Antonio Rizzo,et al.  New Active Tools for Supporting Narrative Structures , 2002, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[4]  Jeannette M. Wing.  An introduction to computer science for non-majors using principles of computation , 2007, SIGCSE.

[5]  Seymour Papert,et al.  Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas , 1981 .

[6]  Allison Druin,et al.  KidPad: collaborative storytelling for children , 2002, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[7]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  Designing a technological playground: a field study of the emergence of play in household messaging , 2010, CHI.

[8]  Marc Hassenzahl,et al.  Funology: designing enjoyment , 2002, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[9]  Alissa Nicole Antle,et al.  LIFELONG INTERACTIONSEmbodied child computer interaction: why embodiment matters , 2009, INTR.

[10]  野中 郁次郎,et al.  The Knowledge-Creating Company: How , 1995 .

[11]  Yoshihiro Kawahara,et al.  Circuit stickers: peel-and-stick construction of interactive electronic prototypes , 2014, CHI.

[12]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Where the action is , 2001 .

[13]  Victoria Hoban,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner , 2013 .

[14]  David Shaw,et al.  Makey Makey: improvising tangible and nature-based user interfaces , 2012, TEI.

[15]  Chris Stephenson,et al.  Bringing computational thinking to K-12: what is Involved and what is the role of the computer science education community? , 2011, INROADS.

[16]  Elena Bodrova,et al.  Assessing and Scaffolding: Make-Believe Play. , 2012 .

[17]  Franca Garzotto,et al.  Hyperstories and social interaction in 2D and 3D edutainment spaces for children , 2006, HYPERTEXT '06.

[18]  Eric Schweikardt.  Modular robotics studio , 2011, Tangible and Embedded Interaction.

[19]  Mitchel Resnick,et al.  Constructionism in Practice: Designing, Thinking, and Learning in A Digital World , 1996 .

[20]  Victor R. Lee,et al.  Collaborative Strategic Board Games as a Site for Distributed Computational Thinking , 2011, Int. J. Game Based Learn..

[21]  Allison Druin,et al.  Robots for Kids: Exploring New Technologies for Learning , 2000 .

[22]  Arto Puikkonen,et al.  Prochinima: using pico projector to tell situated stories , 2011, Mobile HCI.

[23]  Roy D. Pea,et al.  Assessing computational learning in K-12 , 2014, ITiCSE '14.

[24]  D. Schoen.  The Reflective Practitioner , 1983 .

[25]  Allison Druin,et al.  Tools for children to create physical interactive storyrooms , 2004, CIE.