The impact of response format on relations among intentions, attitudes, and social norms

[1]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Introspection, Attitude Change, and Attitude-Behavior Consistency: the Disruptive Effects of Explaining Why we Feel the Way we Do , 1989 .

[2]  Blair H. Sheppard,et al.  The Theory of Reasoned Action: A Meta-Analysis of Past Research with Recommendations for Modifications and Future Research , 1988 .

[3]  J. Liefeld,et al.  Response Effects in Computer-Administered Questioning , 1988 .

[4]  Jack M. Feldman,et al.  Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. , 1988 .

[5]  R. Tourangeau,et al.  Cognitive Processes Underlying Context Effects in Attitude Measurement , 1988 .

[6]  R. Monty,et al.  Performance as a source of perceived control , 1986 .

[7]  Russell H. Fazio,et al.  Spontaneous Attitude Formation , 1984 .

[8]  R. Bagozzi.  A Field Investigation of Causal Relations among Cognitions, Affect, Intentions, and Behavior , 1982 .

[9]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[10]  Donald R. Lehmann,et al.  Halo Effects in Marketing Research: Review and Prognosis , 1978 .

[11]  Nell E. Beckwith,et al.  Empirical Evidence of Halo Effects in Store Image Research By Estimating True Locations , 1978 .

[12]  M. Laroche.  Four Methodological Problems in Multi-Attribute Attitude Models , 1978 .

[13]  A. Tesser.  Self-Generated Attitude Change , 1978 .

[14]  Donald R. Lehmann,et al.  The Importance of Halo Effects in Multi-Attribute Attitude Models: , 1975 .

[15]  Halo Effects in Brand Belief Measurement: Implications For Attitude Model Development , 1974 .

[16]  E. Thorndike.  A constant error in psychological ratings. , 1920 .