Impact of Incentive Mechanism in Online Referral Programs: Evidence from Randomized Field Experiments

ABSTRACT Despite the growing popularity of online referral programs, a minimal amount is known regarding the theoretical foundations that drive the key actions associated with successful referrals. In this paper, we study which type of referral reward structure is most effective in maximizing word-of-mouth by conducting two randomized experiments in mobile gaming context. Specifically, we examine the effect of three incentive schemes: selfish reward (inviter gets all the reward), equal-split reward (50-50 split), and generous reward (invitee gets all the reward). Consistent across the two experiments, we find that pro-social referral incentive schemes, namely the equal-split and generous schemes, tend to dominate purely selfish schemes in creating WOM. Our mechanism-level analysis shows that both equal-split and generous schemes result in higher number of conversions by significantly increasing the invitee’s likelihood to accept referrals, which we further show that is partially due to selective and better targeted referrals. Our results contribute to the understanding of the optimal design of online referral programs and provide important implications for designing effective referral reward schemes in the digital world.

[1]  L. Feick,et al.  A Penny for Your Thoughts: Referral Reward Programs and Referral Likelihood , 2007 .

[2]  Ravi Bapna,et al.  Do Your Online Friends Make You Pay? A Randomized Field Experiment on Peer Influence in Online Social Networks - Online E-Companion Appendix , 2014, Manag. Sci..

[3]  Xinxin Li,et al.  Impact of Online Word of Mouth on Channel Disintermediation for Information Goods , 2018, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[4]  R. Laing,et al.  Interpersonal perception : a theory and a method of research , 1966 .

[5]  Eyal Biyalogorsky,et al.  Customer Referral Management: Optimal Reward Programs , 2000 .

[6]  B. Gu,et al.  First Step in Social Media - Measuring the Influence of Online Management Responses on Customer Satisfaction , 2011 .

[7]  V. Kumar,et al.  Investigating how Word-of-Mouth Conversations about Brands Influence Purchase and Retransmission Intentions , 2016 .

[8]  Bin Gu,et al.  Informational Cascades and Software Adoption on the Internet: An Empirical Investigation , 2008, MIS Q..

[9]  Thomas W. Valente,et al.  Opinion Leadership and Social Contagion in New Product Diffusion , 2011, Mark. Sci..

[10]  Raghuram Iyengar,et al.  Tricked by Truncation: Spurious Duration Dependence and Social Contagion in Hazard Models , 2011, Mark. Sci..

[11]  Ravi Bapna,et al.  Words Matter! Toward a Prosocial Call-to-Action for Online Referral: Evidence from Two Field Experiments , 2020, Inf. Syst. Res..

[12]  Harpreet Singh,et al.  Knowing What Your Customer Wants: Improving Inventory Allocation Decisions in Online Movie Rental Systems , 2016 .

[13]  Ravi Bapna,et al.  Do Your Online Friends Make You Pay ? A Randomized Field Experiment in an Online Music Social Network , 2012 .

[14]  Bin Fang,et al.  Social Influence and Monetization of Freemium Social Games , 2019, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[15]  A. Banerjee,et al.  A Simple Model of Herd Behavior , 1992 .

[16]  Qiuping Li,et al.  Optimal Referral Bonuses with Asymmetric Information: Firm-Offered and Interpersonal Incentives , 2010, Mark. Sci..

[17]  Jochen Wirtz,et al.  The Role of Metaperception on the Effectiveness of Referral Reward Programs , 2013 .

[18]  U. Gneezy,et al.  Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 25, Number 4—Fall 2011—Pages 191–210 When and Why Incentives (Don’t) Work to Modify Behavior , 2022 .

[19]  C. Bulte,et al.  Referral Programs and Customer Value. , 2011 .

[20]  Rahul Telang,et al.  Effect of Friends’ Churn on Consumer Behavior in Mobile Networks , 2019, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Joseph M. Golden,et al.  Words Matter! Towards Pro-Social Call-to-Action for Online Referral: Evidence from Two Field Experiments , 2019 .

[22]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Pricing Strategies Under Behavioral Observational Learning in Social Networks , 2017 .

[23]  John H. Miller,et al.  NOTES AND COMMENTS GIVING ACCORDING TO GARP: AN EXPERIMENTAL TEST OF THE CONSISTENCY OF PREFERENCES FOR ALTRUISM , 2002 .

[24]  David Godes,et al.  Using Online Conversations to Study Word-of-Mouth Communication , 2004 .

[25]  Eric M. Schwartz,et al.  What Drives Immediate and Ongoing Word of Mouth? , 2011 .

[27]  Katherine L. Milkman,et al.  What Makes Online Content Viral? , 2012 .

[28]  Jochen Wirtz,et al.  The effects of incentives, deal proneness, satisfaction and tie strength on word‐of‐mouth behaviour , 2002 .

[29]  Yili Hong,et al.  On the Role of Fairness and Social Distance in Designing Effective Social Referral Systems , 2016, MIS Q..

[30]  Dylan Walker,et al.  Creating Social Contagion Through Viral Product Design: A Randomized Trial of Peer Influence in Networks , 2010, ICIS.

[31]  Soumya Ray,et al.  What Leads to Prosocial Behaviors on Social Networking Services: A Tripartite Model , 2017, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[32]  J. Coyle,et al.  Electronic word of mouth: The effects of incentives on e‐referrals by senders and receivers , 2013 .

[33]  Esther Duflo,et al.  Peer Effects, Teacher Incentives, and the Impact of Tracking: Evidence from a Randomized Evaluation in Kenya , 2008 .

[34]  Lawrence Feick,et al.  A Penny for Your Thoughts: Referral Reward Programs and Referral Likelihood: , 2007 .

[35]  Arun Sundararajan,et al.  Research Commentary - Information in Digital, Economic, and Social Networks , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[36]  Christophe Van den Bulte,et al.  How Customer Referral Programs Turn Social Capital into Economic Capital , 2018 .

[37]  G. W. Walster,et al.  New directions in equity research. , 1973 .