Robot therapy for stroke survivors: proprioceptive training and regulation of assistance.

Robot therapy seems promising with stroke survivors, but it is unclear which exercises are most effective, and whether other pathologies may benefit from this technique. In general, exercises should exploit the adaptive nature of the nervous system, even in chronic patients. Ideally, exercise should involve multiple sensory modalities and, to promote active subject participation, the level of assistance should be kept to a minimum. Moreover, exercises should be tailored to the different degrees of impairment, and should adapt to changing performance. To this end, we designed three tasks: (i) a hitting task, aimed at improving the ability to perform extension movements; (ii) a tracking task, aimed at improving visuo-motor control; and (iii) a bimanual task, aimed at fostering inter-limb coordination. All exercises are conducted on a planar manipulandum with two degrees of freedom, and involve alternating blocks of exercises performed with and without vision. The degree of assistance is kept to a minimum, and adjusted to the changing subject's performance. All three exercises were tested on chronic stroke survivors with different levels of impairment. During the course of each exercise, movements became faster, smoother, more precise, and required decreasing levels of assistive force. These results point to the potential benefit of that assist-as-needed training with a proprioceptive component in a variety of clinical conditions.

[1]  Geert Molenberghs,et al.  Random Effects Models for Longitudinal Data , 2010 .

[2]  D.J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Optimizing Compliant, Model-Based Robotic Assistance to Promote Neurorehabilitation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[3]  H. Krebs,et al.  Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy on Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[4]  F. Chollet,et al.  Neural Correlates of Proprioceptive Integration in the Contralesional Hemisphere of Very Impaired Patients Shortly After a Subcortical Stroke: An fMRI Study , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[5]  Sarah F Tyson,et al.  Sensory Loss in Hospital-Admitted People With Stroke: Characteristics, Associated Factors, and Relationship With Function , 2008, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[6]  M. Kawato,et al.  Visual Feedback Is Not Necessary for the Learning of Novel Dynamics , 2007, PloS one.

[7]  S.J. Harkema,et al.  A Robot and Control Algorithm That Can Synchronously Assist in Naturalistic Motion During Body-Weight-Supported Gait Training Following Neurologic Injury , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[8]  Raul Benitez,et al.  Motor adaptation as a greedy optimization of error and effort. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  The dynamics of memory as a consequence of optimal adaptation to a changing body , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  David J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  A Computational Model of Human-Robot Load Sharing during Robot-Assisted Arm Movement Training after Stroke , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[11]  D. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Human-robot cooperative movement training: Learning a novel sensory motor transformation during walking with robotic assistance-as-needed , 2007, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[12]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Sensory integration does not lead to sensory calibration , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  M. Casadio,et al.  Impedance-controlled, minimally-assistive robotic training of severely impaired hemiparetic patients , 2006, The First IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics, 2006. BioRob 2006..

[14]  Maarten J. IJzerman,et al.  Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. , 2006, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[15]  P. Morasso,et al.  Braccio di Ferro: a new haptic workstation for neuromotor rehabilitation. , 2006, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[16]  S. Micera,et al.  Robotic techniques for upper limb evaluation and rehabilitation of stroke patients , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[17]  T. Platz,et al.  Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: a multicentre study , 2005, Clinical rehabilitation.

[18]  Philip N. Sabes,et al.  Flexible strategies for sensory integration during motor planning , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  J. Patton,et al.  Evaluation of robotic training forces that either enhance or reduce error in chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  Ferdinando A. Mussa-Ivaldi,et al.  Robot-assisted adaptive training: custom force fields for teaching movement patterns , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  Robert J. van Beers,et al.  How humans combine simultaneous proprioceptive and visual position information , 1996, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Are arm trajectories planned in kinematic or dynamic coordinates? An adaptation study , 1995, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Perceptual distortion contributes to the curvature of human reaching movements , 1994, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  S. Hesse,et al.  Upper and lower extremity robotic devices for rehabilitation and for studying motor control , 2003, Current opinion in neurology.

[25]  David J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Hemiparetic stroke impairs anticipatory control of arm movement , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[26]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[27]  S. Black,et al.  The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery after Stroke: A Critical Review of Its Measurement Properties , 2002, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[28]  C. Burgar,et al.  Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[29]  D. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Alterations in reaching after stroke and their relation to movement direction and impairment severity. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[30]  H. F. Machiel van der Loos,et al.  Development of robots for rehabilitation therapy: the Palo Alto VA/Stanford experience. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[31]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robot training enhanced motor outcome in patients with stroke maintained over 3 years , 1999, Neurology.

[32]  Anne C. Sittig,et al.  The precision of proprioceptive position sense , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[33]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. , 1998, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[34]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Rubber hands ‘feel’ touch that eyes see , 1998, Nature.

[35]  Douglas M. Bates,et al.  Mixed-Effects Methods and Classes for S and S-PLUS , 1998 .

[36]  E Bizzi,et al.  Augmented Feedback Presented in a Virtual Environment Accelerates Learning of a Difficult Motor Task. , 1997, Journal of motor behavior.

[37]  J R Flanagan,et al.  Trajectory adaptation to a nonlinear visuomotor transformation: evidence of motion planning in visually perceived space. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  L. Carey,et al.  Sensory loss in stroke patients: effective training of tactile and proprioceptive discrimination. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[39]  Richard W. Bohannon,et al.  Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. , 1987, Physical therapy.

[40]  J. Ware,et al.  Random-effects models for longitudinal data. , 1982, Biometrics.

[41]  Timothy D. Lee,et al.  Motor Control and Learning: A Behavioral Emphasis , 1982 .

[42]  R. Stephenson A and V , 1962, The British journal of ophthalmology.