The attentional blink demonstrates automatic deviance processing in vision

Rare deviations in serial visual stimulation are accompanied by an occipital N2 in the event-related potential [the visual mismatch negativity (vMMN)]. Recent research suggests that the vMMN reflects automatic processing of information on the sensory level as a basis for change detection. To directly test the hypothesis that the vMMN is independent from attention, a rapid-serial-visual-presentation paradigm was applied: Either 300 ms or 700 ms after the presentation of a target (T1) a rare position change was embedded in the stimulation which elicited a vMMN. In another condition participants had to detect a second target (T2) after T1: Importantly, within 300 ms after T1, T2 detection was nearly chance level (‘attentional blink’). This result demonstrates that the vMMN is elicited without attentional allocation.

[1]  Motohiro Kimura,et al.  Attention switching function of memory-comparison-based change detection system in the visual modality. , 2008, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[2]  Shozo Tobimatsu,et al.  Functional characterization of mismatch negativity to a visual stimulus , 2005, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[3]  G. Woodman,et al.  Event-related potential studies of attention , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[4]  Erich Schröger,et al.  Visual distraction: a behavioral and event-related brain potential study in humans , 2006, Neuroreport.

[5]  P. Pazo-Álvarez,et al.  Automatic detection of motion direction changes in the human brain , 2004, The European journal of neuroscience.

[6]  Erich Schröger,et al.  Visual mismatch negativity: new evidence from the equiprobable paradigm. , 2009, Psychophysiology.

[7]  István Czigler,et al.  Memory-based detection of task-irrelevant visual changes. , 2002, Psychophysiology.

[8]  A. Tales,et al.  Visual mismatch negativity highlights abnormal preattentive visual processing in Alzheimer's disease , 2006, Neuroreport.

[9]  Andrea Tales,et al.  Visual mismatch negativity highlights abnormal pre-attentive visual processing in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  I. Winkler,et al.  ‘Primitive intelligence’ in the auditory cortex , 2001, Trends in Neurosciences.

[11]  Stefan Berti,et al.  Distraction of task-relevant information processing by irrelevant changes in auditory, visual, and bimodal stimulus features: a behavioral and event-related potential study. , 2009, Psychophysiology.

[12]  S. Luck,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of feature analysis during visual search. , 1994, Psychophysiology.

[13]  Shimin Fu,et al.  Event-related potentials reveal involuntary processing of orientation changes in the visual modality. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[14]  K L Shapiro,et al.  Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: an attentional blink? . , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  Position but not color deviants result in visual mismatch negativity in an active oddball task , 2009, Neuroreport.

[16]  E. Amenedo,et al.  MMN in the visual modality: a review , 2003, Biological Psychology.

[17]  Phillip J Holcomb,et al.  Surprise? Early visual novelty processing is not modulated by attention. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[18]  B. Julesz Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interactions , 1981, Nature.

[19]  M. Eimer,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of change detection. , 2005, Psychophysiology.

[20]  István Czigler,et al.  Unnoticed regularity violation elicits change-related brain activity , 2009, Biological Psychology.