Accessibility Marking: Discourse Functions, Discourse Profiles, and Processing Cues

When accounting for the usage of some linguistic form, one can refer to its discourse profile, all concomitant features frequently co-occurring with that form in discourse, or abstract a more general claim about its discourse function, referring only to the necessary and sufficient conditions for the proper occurrence of the form. This article discusses discourse profile and discourse function approaches to referring expressions in linguistic and psycholinguistic research. Focusing on English prenominal possessive noun phrases (NPs, e.g., my career), I argue that although their (prototypical) discourse profile is amenable to clearly defined automatic processing or production cues, and to explaining potential grammaticizations, only their discourse functions can account for all the forms actually attested in discourse. I conclude that both types of accounts are linguistically relevant, and I propose that psycholinguists devise experiments to test the three hypotheses outlined (discourse profiles, discourse functions, and a combination of discourse profiles and discourse functions).

[1]  F. Hargreave.  Case , 1967 .

[2]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Explorations in Cognition , 1975 .

[3]  W. Chafe.  Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view , 1976 .

[4]  Jerry R. Hobbs,et al.  Pronoun resolution , 1977, SGAR.

[5]  K. Ehrlich,et al.  Comprehension of Pronouns , 1980 .

[6]  Roger Hawkins,et al.  Towards an account of the possessive constructions: NP's N and the N of NP1 , 1981, Journal of Linguistics.

[7]  S. Garrod,et al.  THE MENTAL REPRESENTATION OF DISCOURSE IN A FOCUSSED MEMORY SYSTEM: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE INTERPRETATION OF ANAPHORIC NOUN PHRASES , 1982 .

[8]  Sharon Lee Armstrong,et al.  What some concepts might not be , 1983, Cognition.

[9]  R. Langacker.  Foundations of cognitive grammar , 1983 .

[10]  T. Givon.  Topic Continuity in Discourse , 1983 .

[11]  C. Brown,et al.  Topic continuity in written English narrative , 1983 .

[12]  T. Givón.  Topic continuity in spoken English , 1983 .

[13]  Barbara A. Fox.  Discourse Structure and Anaphora: References , 1987 .

[14]  Ergative and active traits in Latin , 1985 .

[15]  Simon Garrod,et al.  On the real-time character of interpretation during reading , 1985 .

[16]  Annette Karmiloff-Smith,et al.  Language and cognitive processes from a developmental perspective , 1985 .

[17]  Paul Deane,et al.  English Possessives, Topicality, and the Silverstein Hierarchy , 1987 .

[18]  John W. Du Bois.  The Discourse Basis of Ergativity , 1987 .

[19]  Mira Ariel.  Referring and accessibility , 1988, Journal of Linguistics.

[20]  Ronald W. Langacker,et al.  A usage-based model , 1988 .

[21]  C. Fillmore,et al.  Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of Let Alone , 1988 .

[22]  Mira Ariel.  Female and male stereotypes in Israeli literature and media: Evidence from introductory patterns , 1988 .

[23]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  The Crosslinguistic Study of Sentence Processing. , 1992 .

[24]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  Functionalism and the competition model , 1989 .

[25]  M. Gernsbacher,et al.  The cataphoric use of the indefinite this in spoken narratives , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[26]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  Measuring inhibition and facilitation from pronouns , 1990 .

[27]  Mira Ariel.  Accessing Noun-Phrase Antecedents , 1990 .

[28]  Elinor Ochs,et al.  Genitive Constructions and Agency in Samoan Discourse , 1990 .

[29]  R. Gibbs,et al.  Comprehending figurative referential descriptions. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[30]  S. Thompson,et al.  Discourse description : diverse linguistic analyses of a fund-raising text , 1992 .

[31]  Paul Douglas Deane,et al.  Grammar in mind and brain : explorations in cognitive syntax , 1992 .

[32]  E. Bates.  Early language development and its neural correlates , 1992 .

[33]  Alan Garnham,et al.  The role of implicit causality and gender cue in the interpretation of pronouns , 1992 .

[34]  Sandra A. Thompson,et al.  The semantics and pragmatics of associative de in Mandarin discourse , 1992 .

[35]  E. Prince.  The ZPG Letter: Subjects, Definiteness, and Information-status , 1992 .

[36]  郑有志.  谈谈A Grammar of Contemporary English对于分句与句子问题的若干处理 , 1993 .

[37]  G. Murphy,et al.  Metaphoric reference: When metaphors are not understood as easily as literal expressions , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[38]  S. Garrod,et al.  The Role of Different Types of Anaphor in the On-Line Resolution of Sentences in a Discourse , 1994 .

[39]  J. Taylor.  "Subjective" and "objective" readings of possessor nominals , 1994 .

[40]  Helena Halmari.  On Accessibility and Coreference , 1994, Nordic Journal of Linguistics.

[41]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Unheralded Pronouns and Management by Common Ground , 1994 .

[42]  Mike Rinck,et al.  Anaphora Resolution and the Focus of Attention in Situation Models , 1995 .

[43]  Janet L. McDonald,et al.  THE TIME COURSE OF ANAPHOR RESOLUTION: EFFECTS OF IMPLICIT VERB CAUSALITY AND GENDER , 1995 .

[44]  Leo G. M. Noordman,et al.  Demonstrative nominal anaphors: a case of nonidentificational markedness , 1995 .

[45]  Hilary Chappell,et al.  Inalienability and the personal domain in Mandarin Chinese discourse , 1996 .

[46]  Andreas H. Jucker.  News actor labelling in British newspapers , 1996 .

[47]  Ö. Dahl,et al.  Animacy in grammar and discourse , 1996 .

[48]  J. Toole,et al.  The effect of genre of referential choice , 1996 .

[49]  Alfons Maes.  The Markedness of Abstract-Object Anaphors in Discourse , 1996 .

[50]  Mira Ariel,et al.  Referring expressions and the +/- coreference distinction , 1996 .

[51]  Kari Fraurud,et al.  Cognitive ontology and NP form , 1996 .

[52]  Maria Polinsky,et al.  Possessives in English , 1996 .

[53]  Sandra A. Thompson,et al.  Three Frequency Effects in Syntax , 1997 .

[54]  Manuel Carreiras,et al.  When Words Have Two Genders: Anaphor Resolution for Italian Functionally Ambiguous Words , 1997 .

[55]  Participant and Event Anaphora in Newspaper Articles , 1997 .

[56]  Bernd Heine,et al.  Possession: Cognitive Sources, Forces, and Grammaticalization , 1997 .

[57]  Mira Ariel,et al.  A self versus other point of view in language: redefining femininity and masculinity , 1998 .

[58]  Søren Wichmann,et al.  Reference and referent accessibility , 1998 .

[59]  C. Chambers,et al.  Structural Parallelism and Discourse Coherence: A Test of Centering Theory , 1998 .

[60]  Papers from the 34th meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society , 1998 .

[61]  Mira Ariel,et al.  Cognitive Universals and Linguistic Conventions: The Case of Resumptive Pronouns , 1999 .

[62]  Mira Ariel.  Accessibility theory: An overview , 2001 .

[63]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Frequency effects on French liaison , 2001 .

[64]  Mira Ariel,et al.  The Possessive NP Construction: Discourse Function and Discourse Profile , 2002 .

[65]  Jean-Christophe Verstraete,et al.  Review of Joan Bybee & Paul J. Hopper (2001) Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure (Amsterdam: Benjamins) , 2005 .

[66]  Jean Christophe Verstraeh.  Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure , 2005 .