Opportunities for Low Indirect Land Use Biomass for Biofuels in Europe

Sustainable biofuels are an important tool for the decarbonisation of transport. This is especially true in aviation, maritime, and heavy-duty sectors with limited short-term alternatives. Their use by conventional transport fleets requires few changes to the existing infrastructure and engines, and thus their integration can be smooth and relatively rapid. Provision of feedstock should comply with sustainability principles for (i) producing additional biomass without distorting food and feed markets and (ii) addressing challenges for ecosystem services, including biodiversity, and soil quality. This paper performs a meta-analysis of current research for low indirect land use change (ILUC) risk biomass crops for sustainable biofuels that benefited either from improved agricultural practices or from cultivation in unused, abandoned, or severely degraded land. Two categories of biomass crops are considered here: oil and lignocellulosic. The findings confirm that there are significant opportunities to cultivate these crops in European agro-ecological zones with sustainable agronomic practices both in farming land and in land with natural constraints (unused, abandoned, and degraded land). These could produce additional low environmental impact feedstocks for biofuels and deliver economic benefits to farmers.

[1]  M. Prussi,et al.  Assessment of the Feedstock Availability for Covering EU Alternative Fuels Demand , 2022, Applied Sciences.

[2]  C. Dormann,et al.  European agroforestry has no unequivocal effect on biodiversity: a time-cumulative meta-analysis , 2021, BMC Ecology and Evolution.

[3]  J. Woods,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA): informing the development of a sustainable circular bioeconomy? , 2021, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A.

[4]  M. Acciaro,et al.  Potential and limiting factors in the use of alternative fuels in the European maritime sector , 2021, Journal of cleaner production.

[5]  Mateus Cristian Gomes Souza,et al.  Methylic and ethylic biodiesel production from crambe oil (Crambe abyssinica): New aspects for yield and oxidative stability , 2021 .

[6]  Hwai Chyuan Ong,et al.  Progress in utilisation of waste cooking oil for sustainable biodiesel and biojet fuel production , 2020 .

[7]  C. Panoutsou,et al.  Competitive priorities to address optimisation in biomass value chains: The case of biomass CHP , 2020, Global Transitions.

[8]  J. Dias,et al.  The cycle of biodiesel production from Crambe abyssinica in Portugal , 2019, Industrial Crops and Products.

[9]  A. Nowak,et al.  Yield and Economic Results of Spring Barley Grown in Crop Rotation and in Monoculture , 2019, Polish Journal of Environmental Studies.

[10]  N. Batjes,et al.  Effects of agricultural management practices on soil quality: A review of long-term experiments for Europe and China , 2018, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment.

[11]  Y. Kuzyakov,et al.  Agroforestry systems: Meta‐analysis of soil carbon stocks, sequestration processes, and future potentials , 2018, Land Degradation & Development.

[12]  P. Burgess,et al.  Advances in European agroforestry: results from the AGFORWARD project , 2018, Agroforestry Systems.

[13]  J. Hillier,et al.  Which agroforestry options give the greatest soil and above ground carbon benefits in different world regions , 2018 .

[14]  R. Lal,et al.  Ecosystem carbon sequestration through restoration of degraded lands in Northeast India , 2018 .

[15]  A. Woźniak,et al.  EFFECT OF CROP ROTATION AND TILLAGE SYSTEM ON THE WEED INFESTATION AND YIELD OF SPRING WHEAT AND ON SOIL PROPERTIES , 2018 .

[16]  S. Bergante,et al.  Biomass production and energy balance of herbaceous and woody crops on marginal soils in the Po Valley , 2017 .

[17]  G. Bonan,et al.  Managing uncertainty in soil carbon feedbacks to climate change , 2016 .

[18]  M. Almagro,et al.  Carbon sequestration potential in perennial bioenergy crops: the importance of organic matter inputs and its physical protection , 2016 .

[19]  I. Thomsen,et al.  The ability of cover crops to reduce nitrogen and phosphorus losses from arable land in southern Scandinavia and Finland , 2016, Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.

[20]  J. Lindquist,et al.  Cover Crops and Ecosystem Services: Insights from Studies in Temperate Soils , 2015 .

[21]  M. Viitasalo,et al.  Effects of climate change and agricultural adaptation on nutrient loading from Finnish catchments to the Baltic Sea. , 2015, The Science of the total environment.

[22]  N. H. Ravindranath,et al.  Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU) , 2014 .

[23]  P. Capriel Trends in organic carbon and nitrogen contents in agricultural soils in Bavaria (south Germany) between 1986 and 2007 , 2013 .

[24]  C. Poschenrieder,et al.  Cynara cardunculus a potentially useful plant for remediation of soils polluted with cadmium or arsenic , 2012 .

[25]  J. Rabaça,et al.  The importance of the surroundings: are bird communities of riparian galleries influenced by agroforestry matrices in SW Iberian Peninsula? , 2012, Annals of Forest Science.

[26]  C. Barrow Biochar: Potential for countering land degradation and for improving agriculture , 2012 .

[27]  A. Castrignanò,et al.  Climate change impact on crop rotations of winter durum wheat and tomato in southern Italy: yield analysis and soil fertility , 2012 .

[28]  C. Panoutsou Supply of Solid Biofuels: Potential Feedstocks, Cost and Sustainability Issues in EU27 , 2011 .

[29]  R. Hüttl,et al.  Ecological benefits of the alley cropping agroforestry system in sensitive regions of Europe , 2009 .