Effect of Bileaflet Valve Orientation on the 3D Flow Dynamics in the Sinus of Valsalva

Three-dimensional (3D) evolutional behavior of flow dynamics in the aortic sinus of Valsalva was studied in vitro for finding the effects of bileaflet valve orientations in an effort to investigate possible linkages between the sinus flow and coronary circulation. A realistic model of the aortic sinus was machined inside an acrylic block. A St. Jude Medical bileaflet aortic valve was utilized. Two orientations were compared; (1) a pair of hinges aligned in the direction of the non-coronary sinus of the model (N0) and (2) of the left and right sinuses (N90). A 3D scanning three-component velocity measurement, named Fluorescent Scanning Stereoscopic Particle Image Velocimetry (FS-SPIV), was developed. Measured data were validated with an aid of two-dimensional particle image velocimetry. Good agreement confirmed the capability of quantifying the 3D mean and turbulent behavior of sinus vortices. The valve orientation was found to be unable to affect the sinus vortices during peak-systole, but had a substantial impact on regurgitation during end-systole. The superior case (N0) gave a symmetric regurgitation. The regurgitant jet was directed to the non-coronary sinus. The left and right sinuses were dominated by a well-organized recirculation from a persistent forward flow. The inferior case (N90) produced an asymmetric regurgitation with a biased jet into the left or right sinuses, leading to produce unexpected turbulence near the entrance of coronary artery. Those results suggest possible linkages between the sinus flow and coronary circulation, thereby advocating the existence of an optimal orientation of bileaflet valves.

[1]  Toshinosuke Akutsu,et al.  Time-resolved particle image velocimetry and laser doppler anemometry study of the turbulent flow field of bileaflet mechanical mitral prostheses , 2005, Journal of Artificial Organs.

[2]  L. Talbot,et al.  The fluid mechanics of the aortic valve , 1969, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[3]  Sang Joon Lee,et al.  Direct comparison of 2D PIV and stereoscopic PIV measurements , 2002 .

[4]  L. Brush,et al.  McDonaldʼs Blood Flow in Arteries , 1991 .

[5]  A P Yoganathan,et al.  Bileaflet, tilting disc and porcine aortic valve substitutes: in vitro hydrodynamic characteristics. , 1984, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[6]  H Nygaard,et al.  Orientation of tilting disc and bileaflet aortic valve substitutes for optimal hemodynamics. , 1999, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[7]  D. C. Miller,et al.  Simple modification of "T. David-V" valve-sparing aortic root replacement to create graft pseudosinuses. , 2004, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[8]  Raffaele Scaffa,et al.  Coronary flow characteristics after a Bentall procedure with or without sinuses of Valsalva. , 2004, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[9]  M. Perthel,et al.  Downstream turbulence and high intensity transient signals (HITS) following aortic valve replacement with Medtronic Hall or St. Jude Medical valve substitutes. , 2000, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[10]  Jan Engvall,et al.  Flow patterns in the aortic root and the aorta studied with time-resolved, 3-dimensional, phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging: implications for aortic valve-sparing surgery. , 2004, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[11]  Michael Markl,et al.  Time-resolved three-dimensional magnetic resonance velocity mapping of aortic flow in healthy volunteers and patients after valve-sparing aortic root replacement. , 2005, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[12]  C. Schmidtke,et al.  Size and distensibility of the aortic root and aortic valve function after different techniques of the ross procedure. , 2000, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[13]  H. Reul,et al.  Three-dimensional visualization of velocity fields downstream of six mechanical aortic valves in a pulsatile flow model. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  Z. C. Liu,et al.  Distortion compensation for generalized stereoscopic particle image velocimetry , 1997 .

[15]  M. van’t Veer,et al.  Influence of orientation of bi-leaflet valve prostheses on coronary perfusion pressure in humans. , 2007, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[16]  Pascal Verdonck,et al.  Flow visualization through two types of aortic prosthetic heart valves using stereoscopic high-speed particle image velocimetry. , 2007, Artificial organs.

[17]  Ajit P. Yoganathan,et al.  Experimental Investigation of the Steady Flow Downstream of the St. Jude Bileaflet Heart Valve: A Comparison Between Laser Doppler Velocimetry and Particle Image Velocimetry Techniques , 2004, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  Shu Chien,et al.  Shear Dependence of Effective Cell Volume as a Determinant of Blood Viscosity , 1970, Science.

[19]  Lorenzo Scalise,et al.  Cardiac valve prosthesis flow performances measured by 2D and 3D-stereo particle image velocimetry , 2004 .

[20]  A. Moritz,et al.  Effect of mechanical aortic valve orientation on coronary artery flow: comparison of tilting disc versus bileaflet prostheses in pigs. , 2002, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[21]  T. Ebbers,et al.  Assessment of fluctuating velocities in disturbed cardiovascular blood flow: In vivo feasibility of generalized phase‐contrast MRI , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[22]  P. Jögi,et al.  Sinus of Valsalva aneurysm obstructing coronary arterial flow: case report and collective review of the literature. , 1985, European heart journal.

[23]  J. Westerweel Theoretical analysis of the measurement precision in particle image velocimetry , 2000 .

[24]  Hwa Liang Leo,et al.  Fluid Dynamic Assessment of Three Polymeric Heart Valves Using Particle Image Velocimetry , 2006, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[25]  René M. Botnar,et al.  Assessment of prosthetic aortic valve performance by magnetic resonance velocity imaging , 2000, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[26]  T. Schmitz-Rode,et al.  The geometry of the aortic root in health, at valve disease and after valve replacement. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  Markus Raffel,et al.  Particle Image Velocimetry: A Practical Guide , 2002 .

[28]  Kevin R Johnson,et al.  Coronary artery flow measurement using navigator echo gated phase contrast magnetic resonance velocity mapping at 3.0 T. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.