Optimization of Meropenem Minimum Concentration/MIC Ratio To Suppress In Vitro Resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa

ABSTRACT Suppression of resistance in a dense Pseudomonas aeruginosa population has previously been shown with optimized quinolone exposures. However, the relevance to β-lactams is unknown. We investigated the bactericidal activity of meropenem and its propensity to suppress P. aeruginosa resistance in an in vitro hollow-fiber infection model (HFIM). Two isogenic strains of P. aeruginosa (wild type and an AmpC stably derepressed mutant [MIC = 1 mg/liter]) were used. An HFIM inoculated with approximately 1 × 108 CFU/ml of bacteria was subjected to various meropenem exposures. Maintenance doses were given every 8 h to simulate the maximum concentration achieved after a 1-g dose in all regimens, but escalating unbound minimum concentrations (Cmins) were simulated with different clearances. Serial samples were obtained over 5 days to quantify the meropenem concentrations, the total bacterial population, and subpopulations with reduced susceptibilities to meropenem (>3× the MIC). For both strains, a significant bacterial burden reduction was seen with all regimens at 24 h. Regrowth was apparent after 3 days, with the Cmin/MIC ratio being ≤1.7 (time above the MIC, 100%). Selective amplification of subpopulations with reduced susceptibilities to meropenem was suppressed with a Cmin/MIC of ≥6.2 or by adding tobramycin to meropenem (Cmin/MIC = 1.7). Investigations that were longer than 24 h and that used high inocula may be necessary to fully evaluate the relationship between drug exposures and the likelihood of resistance suppression. These results suggest that the Cmin/MIC of meropenem can be optimized to suppress the emergence of non-plasmid-mediated P. aeruginosa resistance. Our in vitro data support the use of an extended duration of meropenem infusion for the treatment of severe nosocomial infections in combination with an aminoglycoside.

[1]  W. Craig,et al.  Killing and regrowth of bacteria in vitro: a review. , 1990, Scandinavian journal of infectious diseases. Supplementum.

[2]  T. Köhler,et al.  Carbapenem Activities against Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Respective Contributions of OprD and Efflux Systems , 1999, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[3]  M. Zhong,et al.  Pharmacodynamic Assessment of Cefprozil againstStreptococcus pneumoniae: Implications for Breakpoint Determinations , 2000, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[4]  K. Poole,et al.  Influence of Mutations in the mexR Repressor Gene on Expression of the MexA-MexB-OprM Multidrug Efflux System ofPseudomonas aeruginosa , 2000, Journal of bacteriology.

[5]  Robert Leary,et al.  Application of a mathematical model to prevent in vivo amplification of antibiotic-resistant bacterial populations during therapy. , 2003, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[6]  E. Bruck,et al.  National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. , 1980, Pediatrics.

[7]  G. Drusano,et al.  The pharmacokinetics of meropenem. , 1995, Scandinavian journal of infectious diseases. Supplementum.

[8]  R. Hancock,et al.  Multidrug Efflux Systems Play an Important Role in the Invasiveness of Pseudomonas aeruginosa , 2002, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[9]  J. Quinn,et al.  Antibiotic resistance among gram-negative bacilli in US intensive care units: implications for fluoroquinolone use. , 2003, JAMA.

[10]  N. Masuda,et al.  Cross-resistance to meropenem, cephems, and quinolones in Pseudomonas aeruginosa , 1992, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[11]  Christina A. Sutherland,et al.  Pharmacokinetics of Meropenem 0.5 and 2 g Every 8 Hours as a 3‐Hour Infusion , 2003, Pharmacotherapy.

[12]  O. Cars,et al.  Standardization of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) terminology for anti-infective drugs. , 2002, International journal of antimicrobial agents.

[13]  S. Miyazaki,et al.  Pharmacodynamics of S-3578, a Novel Cephem, in Murine Lung and Systemic Infection Models , 2004, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[14]  Michael Nikolaou,et al.  Modelling time-kill studies to discern the pharmacodynamics of meropenem. , 2005, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[15]  R. Owens,et al.  Clinical pharmacodynamics of quinolones. , 2003, Infectious disease clinics of North America.

[16]  N. Masuda,et al.  Substrate Specificities of MexAB-OprM, MexCD-OprJ, and MexXY-OprM Efflux Pumps in Pseudomonas aeruginosa , 2000, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[17]  Robert Leary,et al.  Bacterial-population responses to drug-selective pressure: examination of garenoxacin's effect on Pseudomonas aeruginosa. , 2005, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[18]  D. Livermore,et al.  Beta-lactamase lability and inducer power of newer beta-lactam antibiotics in relation to their activity against beta-lactamase-inducibility mutants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. , 1987, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[19]  Max Salfinger,et al.  Selection of a moxifloxacin dose that suppresses drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis, by use of an in vitro pharmacodynamic infection model and mathematical modeling. , 2004, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[20]  R. V. Miller,et al.  Imipenem resistance in pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO: mapping of the OprD2 gene , 1991, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[21]  N. Masuda,et al.  Outer membrane proteins responsible for multiple drug resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa , 1995, Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy.

[22]  J A Bilello,et al.  Effect of 2',3'-didehydro-3'-deoxythymidine in an in vitro hollow-fiber pharmacodynamic model system correlates with results of dose-ranging clinical studies , 1994, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[23]  D. Landman,et al.  Citywide clonal outbreak of multiresistant Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Brooklyn, NY: the preantibiotic era has returned. , 2002, Archives of internal medicine.

[24]  K. Poole,et al.  Differential Impact of MexB Mutations on Substrate Selectivity of the MexAB-OprM Multidrug Efflux Pump of Pseudomonas aeruginosa , 2004, Journal of bacteriology.

[25]  Clinical,et al.  Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically : Approved standard , 2006 .

[26]  Mary Jane Ferraro,et al.  Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically : approved standard , 2000 .

[27]  T. Köhler,et al.  In Vivo Emergence of Multidrug-Resistant Mutants ofPseudomonas aeruginosa Overexpressing the Active Efflux System MexA-MexB-OprM , 1999, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[28]  J. Bosso,et al.  In vitro pharmacodynamics of ceftazidime against Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from cystic fibrosis patients , 1997, Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy.

[29]  V. Tam,et al.  Pharmacodynamics of cefepime in patients with Gram-negative infections. , 2002, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[30]  Angela Lee,et al.  Identification and Characterization of Inhibitors of Multidrug Resistance Efflux Pumps in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Novel Agents for Combination Therapy , 2001, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[31]  D. Nicolau,et al.  Pharmacodynamic profile of daptomycin against Enterococcus species and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a murine thigh infection model. , 2003, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[32]  W. Craig,et al.  In Vivo Activities of Amoxicillin and Amoxicillin-Clavulanate against Streptococcus pneumoniae: Application to Breakpoint Determinations , 1998, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[33]  D. Livermore,et al.  β-Lactamase Lability and Inducer Power of Newer β-Lactam Antibiotics in Relation to Their Activity Against β-Lactamase-Inducibility Mutants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa , 1987 .

[34]  C. Wa,et al.  Killing and regrowth of bacteria in vitro: a review. , 1990 .

[35]  V. Tam,et al.  Comparison of β-lactams in counter-selecting resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa , 2005 .

[36]  V. Tam,et al.  Novel Approach to Characterization of Combined Pharmacodynamic Effects of Antimicrobial Agents , 2004, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.