One Dimensional Modeling and Experimental Validation of Single Cylinder Pneumatic Combustion Hybrid Engine

The objective of this paper is to present and to validate a numerical model of a single-cylinder pneumatic-combustion hybrid engine. The model presented in this paper contains 0-D sub-models for non-spatially distributed components: Engine cylinder, Air tank, wall heat losses. 1-D sub-models for spatially distributed components are applied on the compressive gas flows in pipes (intake, exhaust and charging). Each pipe is discretized, using the Two-Steps Lax-Wendroff scheme (LW2) including Davis T.V.D. The boundaries conditions used at pipe ends are Method Of Characteristics (MOC) based. In the specific case of a valve, an original intermediate volume MOC based boundary condition is used. The numerical results provided by the engine model are compared with the experimental data obtained from a single cylinder prototype hybrid engine on a test bench operating in 4-stroke pneumatic pump and 4 stroke pneumatic motor modes. In each mode, the prediction of the mass flow rates, amplitude and timing of the charging pipe waves are satisfactory, without using any discharge coefficient. Indicated work and p-V diagrams are similar between simulation and measurements in the case of pneumatic pump mode. For the pneumatic motor mode the model underestimates cylinder pressure during the charging process.

[1]  Michael Levin,et al.  Using Camless Valvetrain for Air Hybrid Optimization , 2003 .

[2]  G. Woschni A Universally Applicable Equation for the Instantaneous Heat Transfer Coefficient in the Internal Combustion Engine , 1967 .

[3]  Bengt Johansson,et al.  Simulation of a Pneumatic Hybrid Powertrain with VVT in GT-Power and Comparison with Experimental Data , 2009 .

[4]  R. Courant,et al.  On the solution of nonlinear hyperbolic differential equations by finite differences , 1952 .

[5]  Bengt Johansson,et al.  Vehicle Driving Cycle Simulation of a Pneumatic Hybrid Bus Based on Experimental Engine Measurements , 2010 .

[6]  D. Richtmyer,et al.  A Survey of Difference Methods for Non-Steady Fluid Dynamics , 1962 .

[7]  Bengt Johansson,et al.  Investigation of Different Valve Geometries and Valve Timing Strategies and their Effect on Regenerative Efficiency for a Pneumatic Hybrid with Variable Valve Actuation , 2008 .

[8]  Amgad Elgowainy,et al.  Well-To-Wheels Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles , 2009 .

[9]  De Winterbone,et al.  Theory of Engine Manifold Design: Wave Action Methods for IC Engineers , 2001 .

[10]  Andrej Ivanco,et al.  Energy Management Strategies for a Pneumatic-Hybrid Engine Based on Sliding Window Pattern Recognition , 2010 .

[11]  John B. Heywood,et al.  Internal combustion engine fundamentals , 1988 .

[12]  Michael M. Schechter,et al.  New Cycles for Automobile Engines , 1999 .

[13]  Lino Guzzella,et al.  Modelling and optimizing two- and four-stroke hybrid pneumatic engines , 2009 .

[14]  P. Sweby High Resolution Schemes Using Flux Limiters for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws , 1984 .

[15]  Alain Charlet,et al.  Thermodynamic Cycles for a New Hybrid Pneumatic–Combustion Engine Concept , 2001 .

[16]  Lino Guzzella,et al.  Realizing a Concept for High Efficiency and Excellent Driveability: The Downsized and Supercharged Hybrid Pneumatic Engine , 2009 .

[17]  Yann Chamaillard,et al.  Development and experimental validation of a new one-dimensional valve boundary condition based on the method of characteristics , 2011 .