Investigation of CRISPR/Cas9-induced SD1 rice mutants highlights the importance of molecular characterization in plant molecular breeding.

Although Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated 9 (Cas9) system has been widely used for basic research in model plants, its application for applied breeding in crops has faced strong regulatory obstacles, due mainly to a poor understanding of the authentic output of this system, particularly in higher generations. In this study, different from any previous studies, we investigated in detail the molecular characteristics and production performance of CRISPR/Cas9-generated SD1 (semi-dwarf 1) mutants from T2 to T4 generations, of which the selection of T1 and T2 was done only by visual phenotyping for semidwarf plants. Our data revealed not only on-target and off-target mutations with small and large indels but also exogenous elements in T2 plants. All indel mutants passed stably to T3 or T4 without additional modifications, regardless of the presence or absence of Cas9, while some lines displayed unexpected hereditary patterns of Cas9 or some exogenous elements. In addition, effects of various SD1 alleles on rice height and yield differed depending on genetic backgrounds. Taken together, our data indicated that the CRISPR/Cas9 system is effective in producing homozygous mutants for functional analysis, but it may be not as precise as expected in rice, and that early and accurate molecular characterization and screening must be carried out for generations before transitioning of the CRISPR/Cas9 system from laboratory to field.

[1]  Yang Liu,et al.  Efficient Targeted Genome Modification in Maize Using CRISPR/Cas9 System. , 2016, Journal of genetics and genomics = Yi chuan xue bao.

[2]  Chengcai Chu,et al.  High-efficiency breeding of early-maturing rice cultivars via CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing. , 2017, Journal of genetics and genomics = Yi chuan xue bao.

[3]  Yanpeng Wang,et al.  Simultaneous editing of three homoeoalleles in hexaploid bread wheat confers heritable resistance to powdery mildew , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[4]  Kang Zhang,et al.  Targeted mutagenesis in Zea mays using TALENs and the CRISPR/Cas system. , 2014, Journal of genetics and genomics = Yi chuan xue bao.

[5]  Rainer Fischer,et al.  Characteristics of Genome Editing Mutations in Cereal Crops. , 2017, Trends in plant science.

[6]  Yanpeng Wang,et al.  Genome editing in rice and wheat using the CRISPR/Cas system , 2014, Nature Protocols.

[7]  M. Nishimura,et al.  Genome-Wide Assessment of Efficiency and Specificity in CRISPR/Cas9 Mediated Multiple Site Targeting in Arabidopsis , 2016, PloS one.

[8]  Meiru Li,et al.  Reassessment of the Four Yield-related Genes Gn1a, DEP1, GS3, and IPA1 in Rice Using a CRISPR/Cas9 System , 2016, Front. Plant Sci..

[9]  Q. Xia,et al.  CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Nicotiana tabacum , 2014, Plant Molecular Biology.

[10]  T. Komari,et al.  Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of rice using immature embryos or calli induced from mature seed , 2008, Nature Protocols.

[11]  Masaki Endo,et al.  Multigene Knockout Utilizing Off-Target Mutations of the CRISPR/Cas9 System in Rice , 2014, Plant & cell physiology.

[12]  Holger Puchta,et al.  Knocking out consumer concerns and regulator’s rules: efficient use of CRISPR/Cas ribonucleoprotein complexes for genome editing in cereals , 2017, Genome Biology.

[13]  Tetsuya Ishii,et al.  Towards social acceptance of plant breeding by genome editing. , 2015, Trends in plant science.

[14]  Caixia Gao,et al.  Applications and potential of genome editing in crop improvement , 2018, Genome Biology.

[15]  Kunlun Huang.  Safety Assessment of Genetically Modified Foods , 2017 .

[16]  Xin Zhang,et al.  Targeted mutagenesis in rice using CRISPR-Cas system , 2013, Cell Research.

[17]  M. Spalding,et al.  Large chromosomal deletions and heritable small genetic changes induced by CRISPR/Cas9 in rice , 2014, Nucleic acids research.

[18]  Dipali G. Sashital,et al.  Achieving Plant CRISPR Targeting that Limits Off‐Target Effects , 2016, The plant genome.

[19]  Wentao Xu,et al.  Risk analysis for genome editing-derived food safety in China , 2018 .

[20]  Tao Zhang,et al.  A large-scale whole-genome sequencing analysis reveals highly specific genome editing by both Cas9 and Cpf1 (Cas12a) nucleases in rice , 2018, Genome Biology.

[21]  Kabin Xie,et al.  CRISPR-P 2.0: An Improved CRISPR-Cas9 Tool for Genome Editing in Plants. , 2017, Molecular plant.

[22]  W. F. Thompson,et al.  Rapid isolation of high molecular weight plant DNA. , 1980, Nucleic acids research.

[23]  S. Schaeffer,et al.  CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing and gene replacement in plants: Transitioning from lab to field. , 2015, Plant science : an international journal of experimental plant biology.

[24]  Hao Li,et al.  Generation of inheritable and “transgene clean” targeted genome-modified rice in later generations using the CRISPR/Cas9 system , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[25]  Takuma Ishizaki.  CRISPR/Cas9 in rice can induce new mutations in later generations, leading to chimerism and unpredicted segregation of the targeted mutation , 2016, Molecular Breeding.

[26]  A. Bradley,et al.  Repair of double-strand breaks induced by CRISPR–Cas9 leads to large deletions and complex rearrangements , 2018, Nature Biotechnology.

[27]  Jeffrey D Wolt.  Safety, Security, and Policy Considerations for Plant Genome Editing. , 2017, Progress in molecular biology and translational science.

[28]  Jian‐Kang Zhu,et al.  Application of the CRISPR-Cas system for efficient genome engineering in plants. , 2013, Molecular plant.

[29]  Tobias A Mattei,et al.  The CRISPR-Cas9 Genome Editing System: Not as Precise as Previously Believed. , 2018, World neurosurgery.

[30]  Bing Yang,et al.  Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Gene Editing in Arabidopsis thaliana and Inheritance of Modified Genes in the T2 and T3 Generations , 2014, PloS one.

[31]  G. S. Khush,et al.  Green revolution: A mutant gibberellin-synthesis gene in rice , 2002, Nature.

[32]  Kabin Xie,et al.  Boosting CRISPR/Cas9 multiplex editing capability with the endogenous tRNA-processing system , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[33]  Hao Yin,et al.  Engineering guide RNA to reduce the off-target effects of CRISPR. , 2019, Journal of genetics and genomics = Yi chuan xue bao.

[34]  Jian‐Kang Zhu,et al.  The CRISPR/Cas9 system produces specific and homozygous targeted gene editing in rice in one generation. , 2014, Plant biotechnology journal.

[35]  Fang Yang,et al.  Potential high-frequency off-target mutagenesis induced by CRISPR/Cas9 in Arabidopsis and its prevention , 2017, Plant Molecular Biology.

[36]  Kun Wu,et al.  Modulating plant growth-metabolism coordination for sustainable agriculture , 2018, Nature.

[37]  Emilio Rodríguez-Cerezo,et al.  Deployment of new biotechnologies in plant breeding , 2012, Nature Biotechnology.

[38]  Huw D Jones,et al.  Regulatory uncertainty over genome editing , 2015, Nature Plants.

[39]  K. Nishitani,et al.  Ethylene-gibberellin signaling underlies adaptation of rice to periodic flooding , 2018, Science.

[40]  Botao Zhang,et al.  Multigeneration analysis reveals the inheritance, specificity, and patterns of CRISPR/Cas-induced gene modifications in Arabidopsis , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  Rui Zhang,et al.  Precise base editing in rice, wheat and maize with a Cas9-cytidine deaminase fusion , 2017, Nature Biotechnology.