Electrical-modelling, design and simulation of cumulative radiation effects in semiconductor pixels detectors: prospects and limits

Silicon detectors have gained in popularity since silicon became a widely used micro/nanoelectronic semiconductor material. Silicon detectors are used in particle physics as well as imaging for pixel based detecting systems. Over the past twenty years a lot of experimental efforts have been focused on the effects of ionizing and non-ionizing radiation on silicon pixels. Some of this research was done in the framework of high luminosity particle physics experiments, along with radiation hardness studies of basic semiconductors devices. In its simplest form the semiconductor pixel detectors reduce to a PIN or PN structure partially or totally depleted, or in some MOS and APD (Avalanche PhotoDiode) structures. Bulk or surface defects affect considerably transport of free carriers. We propose guidelines for pixel design, which will be tested through a few pixel structures. This design method includes into the design the properties of defects. The electrical properties reduce to parameters, which can be introduced in a standard simulation code to make predictive simulations. We include an analytical model for defect annealing derived from isochronal annealing experiments. The proposed method can be used to study pixels detectors with different geometrical structures and made with different semiconducting materials. Its purpose is to provide an alternative to tedious and extensive radiation tests on final fabricated detectors. This is necessary for the long-term reliability of detectors together with their radiation tolerance. A general method for pixel design is introduced and we will show how it can be used for the design of alternate to silicon (germanium) pixels.

[1]  A. Satta,et al.  Vacancy Clusters in Germanium , 2007 .

[2]  F. Orsini,et al.  Performance of a fast programmable active pixel sensor chip designed for charged particle detection , 2005, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2005.

[3]  Morris Swartz,et al.  A Detailed Simulation of the CMS Pixel Sensor , 2002 .

[4]  Thomas A. Langdo,et al.  High-quality germanium photodiodes integrated on silicon substrates using optimized relaxed graded buffers , 1998 .

[5]  N. Fourches,et al.  High defect density regions in neutron irradiated high‐purity germanium: Characteristics and formation mechanisms , 1995 .

[6]  Claude A. Klein,et al.  Bandgap Dependence and Related Features of Radiation Ionization Energies in Semiconductors , 1968 .

[7]  K. Gill,et al.  Bulk damage effects in irradiated silicon detectors due to clustered divacancies , 1997 .

[8]  Mika Huhtinen,et al.  Simulation of non-ionising energy loss and defect formation in silicon , 2002 .

[9]  R. London,et al.  Ionization by impact electrons in solids: Electron mean free path fitted over a wide energy range , 2005, cond-mat/0506136.

[10]  Hans Bichsel,et al.  Straggling in thin silicon detectors , 1988 .

[11]  Nicolas Fourches,et al.  Neutron-induced defects in high-purity germanium , 1991 .

[12]  C. R. Crowell,et al.  Threshold Energies for Electron-Hole Pair Production by Impact Ionization in Semiconductors , 1972 .

[13]  A. Larsen,et al.  Divacancy defects in germanium studied using deep-level transient spectroscopy , 2010 .

[14]  M. Takenaka,et al.  Dark current reduction of Ge photodetector by GeO₂ surface passivation and gas-phase doping. , 2012, Optics express.

[15]  Nicolas T. Fourches,et al.  Device simulation of Monolithic Active Pixel Sensors: Radiation damage effects , 2009, 2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.