Foreseeing Meaningful Choices

A choice positively contributes to a player's sense of agency when it leads to meaningfully different content. We shed light on what a player may consider meaningfully different by developing a formalism for interactive stories in terms of the change in situational content across choices. We hypothesized that a player will feel a higher sense of agency when making a choice if they foresee the available actions lead to meaningfully different states. We experimentally tested our formalism's ability to characterize choices that elicit a higher sense of agency and present evidence that supports our claim. Study participants (n = 88) played a choose-your-own-adventure game and reported a higher sense of agency when faced with choices that differed in situational content over choices that didn't, despite these choices differing in non-situational ways. We contend our findings are a step toward principled approaches to the design of interactive stories that target specific cognitive and affective states.

[1]  Nicolas Szilas,et al.  Requirements for Computational Models of Interactive Narrative , 2010, AAAI Fall Symposium: Computational Models of Narrative.

[2]  J. Fleiss.  Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. , 1971 .

[3]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  The Construction of Situation Models in Narrative Comprehension: An Event-Indexing Model , 1995 .

[4]  Robert Michael Young,et al.  Modelling Character Knowledge in Plan-Based Interactive Narrative to Extend Accomodative Mediation , 2013, Intelligent Narrative Technologies.

[5]  Edward L. Deci,et al.  Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior , 1975, Perspectives in Social Psychology.

[6]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Situation models in language comprehension and memory. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Strategies of discourse comprehension , 1983 .

[8]  Dave Morris,et al.  Game architecture and design , 1999 .

[9]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[10]  Christoph Klimmt,et al.  Measuring User Responses to Interactive Stories: Towards a Standardized Assessment Tool , 2010, ICIDS.

[11]  Rogelio Enrique Cardona-Rivera,et al.  Approaching a Player Model of Game Story Comprehension Through Affordance in Interactive Narrative , 2011, Intelligent Narrative Technologies.

[12]  Amy Bruckman,et al.  THE COMBINATORICS OF STORYTELLING: MYSTERY TRAIN INTERACTIVE , 1990 .

[13]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness , 1985 .

[14]  Darren Newtson.  Attribution and the unit of perception of ongoing behavior. , 1973 .

[15]  J. Murray.  Hamlet on the Holodeck , 1997 .

[16]  M. Friedman.  The Use of Ranks to Avoid the Assumption of Normality Implicit in the Analysis of Variance , 1937 .

[17]  Jichen Zhu,et al.  Agency Play: Dimensions of Agency for Interactive Narrative Design , 2009, AAAI Spring Symposium: Intelligent Narrative Technologies II.

[18]  Gilad Chen,et al.  Validation of a New General Self-Efficacy Scale , 2001 .

[19]  Stephen G. Ware,et al.  Achieving the Illusion of Agency , 2012, ICIDS.

[20]  R. Michael Young,et al.  Notes on the Use of Plan Structures in the Creation of Interactive Plot , 1999 .

[21]  Katie Salen,et al.  Rules of play: game design fundamentals , 2003 .

[22]  Robert Michael Young,et al.  From linear story generation to branching story graphs , 2005, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[23]  E. B. Page.  Ordered Hypotheses for Multiple Treatments: A Significance Test for Linear Ranks , 1963 .

[24]  Michael Young.  Planning in Narrative Generation : A Review of Plan-Based Approaches to the Generation of Story , Discourse and Interactivity in Narratives , 2015 .

[25]  Gabriel A. Radvansky,et al.  Across the Event Horizon , 2012 .

[26]  Arnav Jhala,et al.  Towards a theory of choice poetics , 2014, FDG.

[27]  Gabriel A Radvansky,et al.  Event perception. , 2011, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.