D-STAG : un formalisme d'analyse automatique de discours fondé sur les TAG synchrones
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Bonnie L. Webber,et al. Computing Discourse Semantics: The Predicate-Argument Semantics of Discourse Connectives in D-LTAG , 2005, J. Semant..
[2] Joakim Nivre,et al. Natural Language Parsing , 2006 .
[3] Yayoi Nakamura-Delloye. Détection des propositions syntaxiques du français en vue de l’alignement des propositions de textes parallèles français-japonais , 2006, JEPTALNRECITAL.
[4] Stuart M. Shieber,et al. Simpler TAG semantics through synchronization , 2006 .
[5] G. Miller,et al. Cognitive science. , 1981, Science.
[6] Livio Robaldo,et al. The Penn Discourse Treebank 2.0 Annotation Manual , 2007 .
[7] Nicholas Asher,et al. Reference to abstract objects in discourse , 1993, Studies in linguistics and philosophy.
[8] Florian Wolf,et al. Coherence in Natural Language: Data Structures and Applications , 2006 .
[9] Alex Lascarides,et al. Logics of Conversation , 2005, Studies in natural language processing.
[10] L. Danlos,et al. Right frontier constraint for discourses in non-canonical order , 2008 .
[11] Éric Villemonte de la Clergerie. From metagrammars to factorized TAG/TIG parsers , 2005, IWPT.
[12] Laurence Danlos,et al. Discourse Dependency Structures as Constrained DAGs , 2004, SIGDIAL Workshop.
[13] Zellig S. Harris,et al. Mathematical structures of language , 1968, Interscience tracts in pure and applied mathematics.
[14] Aravind K. Joshi,et al. Tree-Adjoining Grammars , 1997, Handbook of Formal Languages.
[15] Richard C. Waters,et al. Tree Insertion Grammar: A Cubic-Time, Parsable Formalism that Lexicalizes Context-Free Grammar without Changing the Trees Produced , 1995, CL.
[16] Yann Mathet,et al. ANNODIS: une approche outillée de l’annotation de structures discursives , 2009, JEPTALNRECITAL.
[17] Michel Charolles,et al. FRAMING ADVERBIALS AND THEIR ROLE IN DISCOURSE COHESION FROM CONNEXION TO FORWARD LABELLING , 2005 .
[18] Sandra A. Thompson,et al. The structure of discourse and ‘subordination’ , 1987 .
[19] Rashmi Prasad,et al. Departures from Tree Structures in Discourse: Shared Arguments in the Penn Discourse TreeBank , 2008 .
[20] Manfred Stede. RST revisited : disentangling nuclearity , 2008 .
[21] Laurence Danlos,et al. Capacité générative forte de RST, SDRT et des DAG de dépendances pour le discours [Strong generative capacity of RST, SDRT and dependency DAGs for discourse] , 2006, TAL.
[22] Alan Lee,et al. Attribution and its annotation in the Penn Discourse TreeBank , 2006, Trait. Autom. des Langues.
[23] Bonnie L. Webber,et al. D-LTAG: extending lexicalized TAG to discourse , 2004, Cogn. Sci..
[24] L. Vieu,et al. Subordinating and coordinating discourse relations , 2005 .
[25] Laurence Delort. Clause 'Subordination' and Discourse Relations. , 2006 .
[26] L. Danlos. G-TAG : un formalisme lexicalisé pour la generation de textes inspiré de TAG : Génération de textes , 1998 .
[27] Claire Gardent. Integrating a Unification-Based Semantics in a Large Scale Lexicalised Tree Adjoining Grammar for French , 2008, COLING.
[28] Bonnie Webber,et al. Multiple Discourse Connectives in a Lexicalized Grammar For Discourse , 2001 .
[29] Daniel Marcu,et al. The rhetorical parsing of unrestricted texts: a surface-based approach , 2000, CL.
[30] William C. Mann,et al. Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization , 1988 .
[31] STUART M. SHIEBER. RESTRICTING THE WEAK‐GENERATIVE CAPACITY OF SYNCHRONOUS TREE‐ADJOINING GRAMMARS , 1994, Comput. Intell..
[32] Laurence Danlos,et al. Sentences with Two Subordinate Clauses: Syntactic and Semantic Analyses, Underspecified Semantic Representation , 2004, TAG+.
[33] Stuart M. Shieber,et al. Synchronous Tree-Adjoining Grammars , 1990, COLING.
[34] Matthew Stone,et al. Anaphora and Discourse Structure , 2001, CL.