An approach to avoiding rank reversal in AHP

Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) has been considerably criticized for possible rank reversal phenomenon caused by the addition or deletion of an alternative. This paper looks into the cause of rank reversal phenomenon and finds that rank reversal is caused by change of local priorities before and after an alternative is added or deleted. An approach is therefore proposed to keep the local priorities unchanged to avoid rank reversal phenomenon. Two well-known numerical examples are re-examined using the proposed approach to demonstrate its validity and practicability in rank preservation.

[1]  Luis G. Vargas.  Comments on Barzilai and Lootsma: Why the Multiplicative AHP Is Invalid: A Practical Counterexample , 1997 .

[2]  Luis G. Vargas.  Reply to Schenkerman's avoiding rank reversal in AHP decision support models , 1994 .

[3]  Luis G. Vargas,et al.  Experiments on rank preservation and reversal in relative measurement , 1993 .

[4]  William C. Wedley,et al.  A COMMENT ON RANK DISAGREEMENT: A COMPARISON OF MULTI-CRITERIA METHODOLOGIES , 1997 .

[5]  Evangelos Triantaphyllou,et al.  Two new cases of rank reversals when the AHP and some of its additive variants are used that do not occur with the multiplicative AHP , 2001 .

[6]  T. Saaty.  Highlights and critical points in the theory and application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1994 .

[7]  Sr Watson,et al.  Assesing Attribute Weights , 1982 .

[8]  Ernest H. Forman.  AHP IS INTENDED FOR MORE THAN EXPECTED VALUE CALCULATIONS , 1990 .

[9]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  The legitimacy of rank reversal , 1984 .

[10]  Stan Schenkerman.  Avoiding rank reversal in AHP decision-support models , 1994 .

[11]  T. Saaty,et al.  Dependence and independence: From linear hierarchies to nonlinear networks , 1986 .

[12]  T. Stewart.  A CRITICAL SURVEY ON THE STATUS OF MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION MAKING THEORY AND PRACTICE , 1992 .

[13]  T. Saaty.  Axiomatic foundation of the analytic hierarchy process , 1986 .

[14]  E. Choo,et al.  A UNIFIED APPROACH TO AHP WITH LINKING PINS , 1993 .

[15]  V. Belton,et al.  The legitimacy of rank reversal—A comment , 1985 .

[16]  Luis G. Vargas,et al.  Reply to “remarks on the analytic hierarchy process” by J. S. Dyer , 1990 .

[17]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  On the relativity of relative measures - accommodating both rank preservation and rank reversals in the AHP , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[18]  T. Saaty.  An exposition of the AHP in reply to the paper “remarks on the analytic hierarchy process” , 1990 .

[19]  William C. Wedley,et al.  A Rejoinder to Forman on AHP, with Emphasis on the Requirements of Composite Ratio Scales* , 1992 .

[20]  T. Saaty.  Decision making, new information, ranking and structure , 1987 .

[21]  Luis G. Vargas,et al.  The theory of ratio scale estimation: Saaty's analytic hierarchy process , 1987 .

[22]  S R Watson,et al.  COMMENTS ON: ASSESSING ATTRIBUTE WEIGHTS BY RATIO , 1983 .

[23]  James S. Dyer,et al.  A clarification of “remarks on the analytic hierarchy process” , 1990 .

[24]  J. Dyer.  Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process , 1990 .

[25]  J. Pérez.  Some comments on Saaty's AHP , 1995 .

[26]  T. Saaty.  RANK GENERATION, PRESERVATION, AND REVERSAL IN THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY DECISION PROCESS , 1987 .

[27]  Valerie Belton,et al.  On a short-coming of Saaty's method of analytic hierarchies , 1983 .

[28]  J. Barzilai,et al.  Ahp Rank Reversal, Normalization and Aggregation Rules , 1994 .

[29]  Ramakrishnan Ramanathan,et al.  Data envelopment analysis for weight derivation and aggregation in the analytic hierarchy process , 2006, Comput. Oper. Res..

[30]  Jonathan Barzilai,et al.  POWER RELATIONS AND GROUP AGGREGATION IN THE MULTIPLICATIVE AHP AND SMART , 1997 .

[31]  F. Lootsma.  SCALE SENSITIVITY IN THE MULTIPLICATIVE AHP AND SMART , 1993 .

[32]  L Vargas.  WHY THE MULTIPLICATIVE AHP IS INVALID: A PRACTICAL EXAMPLE , 1997 .

[33]  Marvin D. Troutt,et al.  Rank reversal and the dependence of priorities on the underlying MAV function , 1988 .

[34]  Dong Cao,et al.  On the efficacy of modeling multi-attribute decision problems using AHP and Sinarchy , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[35]  W. Wedley,et al.  Ambiguous Criteria Weights in AHP: Consequences and Solutions* , 1989 .