Taking advantage of time-averaging

Abstract One of the major obstacles in dealing with any form of data derived from fossils is the effects of time-averaging, which are the result of mixing the remains of organisms that did not live contemporaneously. Although this process results in loss of temporal resolution, it also serves to filter out short-term variations. Temporal resolution of a collection depends not only on the range of fossil ages, but also on their frequency distribution. Previous studies of marine molluscs indicate that most shells in an accumulation are relatively young. Such a distribution of shell ages can be fit by an exponential curve (assuming both a constant probability of shell loss and a constant rate of shell addition), which implies that 90% of the shells were added during the last 50% of the time interval represented by the collection. That is to say, differences between two collections can be discerned even if they overlap 50% in time, because the proportion of shells with shared ages is only 10%. Applying the exponential model to previously published data suggests that long-term rates of destruction are controlled by how frequently shells from the taphonomically active zone are re-exposed to rapid destruction. To take advantage of the “noise-filtering” property of time-averaging, samples need to be large enough to catch the full range of environmental variation recorded by an accumulation. A simple probability formula indicates that samples of easily achievable size can give satisfactory time-averaged results depending on the level of confidence and sampling density defined by the researcher.

[1]  K. Flessa,et al.  High-resolution estimates of temporal mixing within shell beds: the evils and virtues of time-averaging , 1998, Paleobiology.

[2]  Alan H. Cutler,et al.  Time-averaging and postmortem skeletal survival in benthic fossil assemblages: quantitative comparisons among Holocene environments , 1997, Paleobiology.

[3]  R. McBride,et al.  Taphonomic and paleoenvironmental evidence of Holocene shell-bed genesis and history on the northeastern Gulf of Mexico Shelf , 1996 .

[4]  M. Kowalewski,et al.  Time-Averaging, Overcompleteness, and the Geological Record , 1996, The Journal of Geology.

[5]  S. Kidwell,et al.  The Quality of the Fossil Record: Populations, Species, and Communities , 1996 .

[6]  W. D. Liddell,et al.  Comparative taphonomy of bivalves and foraminifera from Holocene tidal flat sediments, Bahia la Choya, Sonora, Mexico (Northern Gulf of California): taphonomic grades and temporal resolution , 1996, Paleobiology.

[7]  S. Kidwell,et al.  The Quality of the Fossil Record: Populations, Species, and Communities , 1996 .

[8]  K. Flessa,et al.  Shell survival and time‐averaging in nearshore and shelf environments: estimates from the radiocarbon literature , 1994 .

[9]  Alan H. Cutler,et al.  Time and taphonomy: quantitative estimates of time-averaging and stratigraphic disorder in a shallow marine habitat , 1993, Paleobiology.

[10]  E. Powell A model for death assemblage formation: Can sediment shelliness be explained? , 1992 .

[11]  Frank W. Stapor,et al.  Barrier-Island Progradation and Holocene Sea Level History in Southwest Florida , 1991 .

[12]  S. Kidwell,et al.  Taphonomy and Time-Averaging of Marine Shelly Faunas , 1991 .

[13]  D. Canfield,et al.  Carbonate Precipitation and Dissolution: Its Relevance to Fossil Preservation , 1991 .

[14]  E. Powell,et al.  When Is an "Old" Shell Really Old? , 1990, The Journal of Geology.

[15]  Alan H. Cutler,et al.  Fossils out of sequence; computer simulations and strategies for dealing with stratigraphic disorder , 1990 .

[16]  M. Aberhan,et al.  Significance of time‐averaging for palaeocommunity analysis , 1990 .

[17]  E. Powell,et al.  Relative rates of shell dissolution and net sediment accumulation ‐ a commentary: can shell beds form by the gradual accumulation of biogenic debris on the sea floor? , 1989 .

[18]  P. E. Hare,et al.  Estimating time-since-death from the free amino acid content of the mollusc shell; a measure of time averaging in modern death assemblages? Description of the technique , 1989 .

[19]  Mark Wilson,et al.  PALEOSCENE #9. Taphonomic Processes: Information Loss and Information Gain , 1988 .

[20]  E. Powell,et al.  The rate of taphonomic loss in modern benthic habitats: How much of the potentially preservable community is preserved? , 1986 .

[21]  R. Aller Carbonate Dissolution in Nearshore Terrigenous Muds: The Role of Physical and Biological Reworking , 1982, The Journal of Geology.

[22]  C. Peterson The paleoecological significance of undetected short-term temporal variability , 1977 .