Improvement of Attenuation Correction in Time-of-Flight PET/MR Imaging with a Positron-Emitting Source

Quantitative PET imaging relies on accurate attenuation correction. Recently, there has been growing interest in combining state-of-the-art PET systems with MR imaging in a sequential or fully integrated setup. As CT becomes unavailable for these systems, an alternative approach to the CT-based reconstruction of attenuation coefficients (μ values) at 511 keV must be found. Deriving μ values directly from MR images is difficult because MR signals are related to the proton density and relaxation properties of tissue. Therefore, most research groups focus on segmentation or atlas registration techniques. Although studies have shown that these methods provide viable solutions in particular applications, some major drawbacks limit their use in whole-body PET/MR. Previously, we used an annulus-shaped PET transmission source inside the field of view of a PET scanner to measure attenuation coefficients at 511 keV. In this work, we describe the use of this method in studies of patients with the sequential time-of-flight (TOF) PET/MR scanner installed at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY. Methods: Five human PET/MR and CT datasets were acquired. The transmission-based attenuation correction method was compared with conventional CT-based attenuation correction and the 3-segment, MR-based attenuation correction available on the TOF PET/MR imaging scanner. Results: The transmission-based method overcame most problems related to the MR-based technique, such as truncation artifacts of the arms, segmentation artifacts in the lungs, and imaging of cortical bone. Additionally, the TOF capabilities of the PET detectors allowed the simultaneous acquisition of transmission and emission data. Compared with the MR-based approach, the transmission-based method provided average improvements in PET quantification of 6.4%, 2.4%, and 18.7% in volumes of interest inside the lung, soft tissue, and bone tissue, respectively. Conclusion: In conclusion, a transmission-based technique with an annulus-shaped transmission source will be more accurate than a conventional MR-based technique for measuring attenuation coefficients at 511 keV in future whole-body PET/MR studies.

[1]  C Nahmias,et al.  Attenuation correction in PET using single photon transmission measurement. , 1994, Medical physics.

[2]  Tung-Hsin Wu,et al.  Radiation exposure during transmission measurements: comparison between CT- and germanium-based techniques with a current PET scanner , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[3]  V. Schulz,et al.  Challenges and current methods for attenuation correction in PET/MR , 2013, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[4]  G Muehllehner,et al.  Singles transmission in volume-imaging PET with a 137Cs source. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  D E Kuhl,et al.  Transmission scanning: a useful adjunct to conventional emission scanning for accurately keying isotope deposition to radiographic anatomy. , 1966, Radiology.

[6]  W. Moses,et al.  Orbiting transmission source for positron tomography , 1988 .

[7]  Patrick Dupont,et al.  Simultaneous maximum a posteriori reconstruction of attenuation and activity distributions from emission sinograms , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  H. Herzog,et al.  Alternative methods for attenuation correction for PET images in MR-PET scanners , 2007, 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[9]  Michael V. Green,et al.  Post-injection transmission attenuation measurements for PET , 1988 .

[10]  Adam Johansson,et al.  CT substitute derived from MRI sequences with ultrashort echo time. , 2011, Medical physics.

[11]  A. Buck,et al.  PET attenuation coefficients from CT images: experimental evaluation of the transformation of CT into PET 511-keV attenuation coefficients , 2002, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[12]  G. Muehllehner,et al.  Attenuation Correction in PET Using CS-137 Singles Transmission and Iterative Reconstruction , 1999 .

[13]  C. Kuhl,et al.  MRI-Based Attenuation Correction for Hybrid PET/MRI Systems: A 4-Class Tissue Segmentation Technique Using a Combined Ultrashort-Echo-Time/Dixon MRI Sequence , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[14]  G. Delso,et al.  PET/MRI system design , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[15]  R. Holen,et al.  The effect of inter-patient attenuation coefficient variability on segmented attenuation correction for PET , 2010 .

[16]  H. Bergmann,et al.  Radioactive Isotopes in Clinical Medicine and Research , 1995 .

[17]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Application of annihilation coincidence detection to transaxial reconstruction tomography. , 1975, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  Gudrun Wagenknecht,et al.  MRI for attenuation correction in PET: methods and challenges , 2012, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[19]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  Whole-body 18F-FDG PET/CT in the presence of truncation artifacts. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[20]  V. Schulz,et al.  MR-based attenuation correction for a whole-body sequential PET/MR system , 2009, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[21]  Vincent Keereman,et al.  Simultaneous MR-Compatible Emission and Transmission Imaging for PET Using Time-of-Flight Information , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[22]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Tissue Classification as a Potential Approach for Attenuation Correction in Whole-Body PET/MRI: Evaluation with PET/CT Data , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[23]  B. Schölkopf,et al.  Towards quantitative PET/MRI: a review of MR-based attenuation correction techniques , 2009, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[24]  S. Vandenberghe,et al.  MRI-Based Attenuation Correction for PET/MRI Using Ultrashort Echo Time Sequences , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[25]  Ilja Bezrukov,et al.  MRI-Based Attenuation Correction for Whole-Body PET/MRI: Quantitative Evaluation of Segmentation- and Atlas-Based Methods , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[26]  Til Aach,et al.  Simultaneous Reconstruction of Activity and Attenuation for PET/MR , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[27]  Susanne Heinzer,et al.  Sequential whole-body PET/MR scanner: concept, clinical use, and optimisation after two years in the clinic. The manufacturer’s perspective , 2013, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[28]  R. Günther,et al.  Automatic, three-segment, MR-based attenuation correction for whole-body PET/MR data , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[29]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  MRI-Based Attenuation Correction for PET/MRI: A Novel Approach Combining Pattern Recognition and Atlas Registration , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[30]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Three-region MRI-based whole-body attenuation correction for automated PET reconstruction. , 2010, Nuclear medicine and biology.

[31]  G. Delso,et al.  Performance Measurements of the Siemens mMR Integrated Whole-Body PET/MR Scanner , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[32]  Debashish Pal,et al.  Attenuation correction for MR table and coils for a sequential PET/MR system , 2009, 2009 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (NSS/MIC).

[33]  Ciprian Catana,et al.  Toward Implementing an MRI-Based PET Attenuation-Correction Method for Neurologic Studies on the MR-PET Brain Prototype , 2010, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[34]  Gaspar Delso,et al.  The effect of limited MR field of view in MR/PET attenuation correction. , 2010, Medical physics.