A comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional techniques for the determination of hindlimb kinematics during treadmill locomotion in rats following spinal cord injury

Of all the detrimental effects of spinal cord injury (SCI), one of the most devastating effects is the disruption of the ability to walk. Therefore, much effort has been focused on developing several methods to document the recovery of locomotor function after experimental SCI. Computerized rat gait analysis is becoming increasingly popular in the SCI research community. The two-dimensional (2D) kinematic approach is by far the most popular technique in rat gait analysis. This is a simple inexpensive procedure, which requires only one camera to record the movement. Our study included an examination of locomotion on a treadmill using 2D and three-dimensional (3D) analysis, in neurologically intact animals and following moderate T9 contusion injury. Despite the overall time course patterns of the curves were identical, we found significant differences between values of the 2D and 3D joint angular motion. In conclusion, maximal precision and accuracy of the kinematic values are expected when the experimental protocol includes a 3D motion analysis methodology. Moreover, a 2D method cannot be used to determine the external or internal rotations of the foot because this movement occurs in the transverse plane.

[1]  Cyril Garnier,et al.  A 3D analysis of fore- and hindlimb motion during locomotion: Comparison of overground and ladder walking in rats , 2008, Behavioural Brain Research.

[2]  M G Pandy,et al.  Computer modeling and simulation of human movement. , 2001, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[3]  Ranu Jung,et al.  Neuromechanical control of locomotion in the rat. , 2005, Journal of neurotrauma.

[4]  Alexander Sasha Rabchevsky,et al.  Experimental modeling of spinal cord injury: characterization of a force-defined injury device. , 2003, Journal of neurotrauma.

[5]  V. Edgerton,et al.  Hindlimb stepping movements in complete spinal rats induced by epidural spinal cord stimulation , 2005, Neuroscience Letters.

[6]  Rémi Hackert,et al.  Gait parameters of treadmill versus overground locomotion in mouse , 2007, Behavioural Brain Research.

[7]  J. Barthe,et al.  Locomotor recovery in the chronic spinal rat: effects of long‐term treatment with a 5‐HT2 agonist , 2002, The European journal of neuroscience.

[8]  T. Ducker,et al.  Experimental treatments of acute spinal cord injury. , 1969, Journal of neurosurgery.

[9]  C H Tator,et al.  Objective clinical assessment of motor function after experimental spinal cord injury in the rat. , 1977, Journal of neurosurgery.

[10]  D. Basso,et al.  Behavioral testing after spinal cord injury: congruities, complexities, and controversies. , 2004, Journal of neurotrauma.

[11]  J. Wrathall Behavioral endpoint measures for preclinical trials using experimental models of spinal cord injury. , 1992, Journal of neurotrauma.

[12]  R. M. Alexander,et al.  Optimization and gaits in the locomotion of vertebrates. , 1989, Physiological reviews.

[13]  M. Norenberg,et al.  The pathology of human spinal cord injury: defining the problems. , 2004, Journal of neurotrauma.

[14]  J. Altman,et al.  Swimming in the rat: Analysis of locomotor performance in comparison to stepping , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  A. Cappozzo,et al.  Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 2: instrumental errors. , 2004, Gait & posture.

[16]  Y. Gahéry,et al.  Kinematics of treadmill locomotion in rats conceived, born, and reared in a hypergravity field (2 g) Adaptation to 1 g , 2004, Behavioural Brain Research.

[17]  T. Oxland,et al.  Animal Models Used in Spinal Cord Regeneration Research , 2002, Spine.

[18]  G. Raisman,et al.  International spinal research trust research strategy. III: A discussion document , 2007, Spinal Cord.

[19]  M. Schwab,et al.  Functional Recovery and Enhanced Corticofugal Plasticity after Unilateral Pyramidal Tract Lesion and Blockade of Myelin-Associated Neurite Growth Inhibitors in Adult Rats , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  Pedro Melo-Pinto,et al.  A comparison analysis of hindlimb kinematics during overground and treadmill locomotion in rats , 2006, Behavioural Brain Research.

[21]  J. Provencher,et al.  Kinematic Analysis of Recovered Locomotor Movements of the Hindlimbs in Paraplegic Rats Transplanted with Monoaminergic Embryonic Neurons a , 1998, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Joe E Springer,et al.  Quantification of locomotor recovery following spinal cord contusion in adult rats. , 2006, Journal of neurotrauma.

[23]  J. Schoenen,et al.  The effect of treadmill training on motor recovery after a partial spinal cord compression-injury in the adult rat. , 2003, Journal of neurotrauma.

[24]  Pedro Melo-Pinto,et al.  Effect of skin movement on the analysis of hindlimb kinematics during treadmill locomotion in rats , 2006, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[25]  K. Pearson,et al.  Computer simulation of stepping in the hind legs of the cat: an examination of mechanisms regulating the stance-to-swing transition. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  A A Biewener,et al.  Hindlimb muscle function in relation to speed and gait: in vivo patterns of strain and activation in a hip and knee extensor of the rat (Rattus norvegicus). , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[27]  I M TARLOV,et al.  Spinal cord compression studies. II. Time limits for recovery after acute compression in dogs. , 1954, A.M.A. archives of neurology and psychiatry.

[28]  Kenneth A. Clarke,et al.  A quantitative study of normal locomotion in the rat , 1986, Physiology & Behavior.

[29]  Volker Dietz,et al.  Efficient testing of motor function in spinal cord injured rats , 2000, Brain Research.

[30]  J. C. Torre,et al.  Neurophysiological recording in rat spinal cord trauma , 1980, Experimental Neurology.

[31]  A Curt,et al.  Validation of the weight-drop contusion model in rats: a comparative study of human spinal cord injury. , 2000, Journal of neurotrauma.

[32]  S. Pellis,et al.  Analysis of limb use by control rats and unilateral DA-depleted rats in the Montoya staircase test: movements, impairments and compensatory strategies , 1997, Behavioural Brain Research.

[33]  F. Lepoutre,et al.  A 3D analysis of hindlimb motion during treadmill locomotion in rats after a 14-day episode of simulated microgravity , 2005, Behavioural Brain Research.

[34]  Manuel Nieto-Sampedro,et al.  Locomotor deficits and adaptive mechanisms after thoracic spinal cord contusion in the adult rat. , 2006, Journal of neurotrauma.

[35]  Pedro Melo-Pinto,et al.  Motion of the foot and ankle during the stance phase in rats , 2002, Muscle & nerve.

[36]  G. Muir,et al.  Assessment of behavioural recovery following spinal cord injury in rats , 2000, The European journal of neuroscience.

[37]  David J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Hindlimb loading determines stepping quantity and quality following spinal cord transection , 2005, Brain Research.

[38]  J. Barthe,et al.  5‐HT1A receptors are involved in short‐ and long‐term processes responsible for 5‐HT‐induced locomotor function recovery in chronic spinal rat , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.

[39]  B. Kakulas,et al.  A review of the neuropathology of human spinal cord injury with emphasis on special features. , 1999, The journal of spinal cord medicine.

[40]  Murali Prakriya,et al.  A computerized grid walking system for evaluating the accuracy of locomotion in rats , 1993, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[41]  V. Edgerton,et al.  Changes in Motoneuron Properties and Synaptic Inputs Related to Step Training after Spinal Cord Transection in Rats , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  V. Dietz,et al.  Treadmill training in incomplete spinal cord injured rats , 2000, Behavioural Brain Research.

[43]  H. Dai,et al.  Methods to Assess the Development and Recovery of Locomotor Function after Spinal Cord Injury in Rats , 1993, Experimental Neurology.

[44]  D. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Robot-assisted hindlimb extension increases the probability of swing initiation during treadmill walking by spinal cord contused rats , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[45]  W. Young,et al.  Effect of Mianserin on Locomotory Function after Thoracic Spinal Cord Hemisection in Rats , 1994, Experimental Neurology.

[46]  D. Basso,et al.  A sensitive and reliable locomotor rating scale for open field testing in rats. , 1995, Journal of neurotrauma.

[47]  C. Vierck,et al.  Criteria for assessing recovery of function after spinal cord injury: Behavioral methods , 1990, Experimental Neurology.

[48]  Bingbing Song,et al.  Recovery of supraspinal control of stepping via indirect propriospinal relay connections after spinal cord injury , 2008, Nature Medicine.

[49]  R. Deumens,et al.  The assessment of locomotor function in spinal cord injured rats: the importance of objective analysis of coordination. , 2005, Journal of neurotrauma.

[50]  R N Hinrichs,et al.  NLT and extrapolated DLT:3-D cinematography alternatives for enlarging the volume of calibration. , 1995, Journal of biomechanics.

[51]  J. Wrathall,et al.  Behavioral assessment of functional deficit in rats with contusive spinal cord injury , 1987, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.