Transient fluid-combustion phenomena in a model scramjet

Abstract An experimental and numerical investigation of the unsteady phenomena induced in a hydrogen-fuelled scramjet combustor under high-equivalence-ratio conditions is carried out, focusing on the processes leading up to unstart. The configuration for the study is the fuelled flow path of the HyShot II flight experiment. Experiments are performed in the HEG reflected-shock wind tunnel, and results are compared with those obtained from unsteady numerical simulations. High-speed schlieren and OH∗ chemiluminescence visualization, together with time-resolved surface pressure measurements, allow links to be drawn between the experimentally observed flow and combustion features. The transient flow structures signalling the onset of unstart are observed to take the form of an upstream-propagating shock train. Both the speed of propagation and the downstream location at which the shock train originates depend strongly on the equivalence ratio. The physical nature of the incipient shock system, however, appears to be similar for different equivalence ratios. Both experiments and computations indicate that the primary mechanism responsible for the transient behaviour is thermal choking, though localized boundary-layer separation is observed to accompany the shock system as it moves upstream. In the numerical simulations, the global choking behaviour is dictated by the limited region of maximum heat release around the shear layer between the injected hydrogen and the incoming air flow. This leads to the idea of ‘local’ thermal choking and results in a lower choking limit than is predicted by a simple integral analysis. Such localized choking makes it possible for new quasi-steady flow topologies to arise, and these are observed in both experiments and simulation. Finally, a quasi-unsteady one-dimensional analytical model is proposed to explain elements of the shock-propagation behaviour.

[1]  U. Vandsburger,et al.  A global reaction model for oh* chemiluminescence applied to a laminar flat-flame burner , 2003 .

[2]  Eugene S Love Pressure rise associated with shock-induced boundary-layer separation , 1955 .

[3]  Johan Steelant,et al.  Methodology of a combined ground based testing and numerical modelling analysis of supersonic combustion flow paths , 2010 .

[4]  Tomoyuki Komuro,et al.  Mach 8 Ground Tests of the Hypermixer Scramjet for HyShot-IV Flight Experiment , 2006 .

[5]  Michael K. Smart,et al.  Flight Data Analysis of the HyShot 2 Scramjet Flight Experiment , 2006 .

[6]  C. Wilke A Viscosity Equation for Gas Mixtures , 1950 .

[7]  Johan Steelant,et al.  Ground Testing of the HyShot Supersonic Combustion Flight Experiment in HEG and Comparison with Flight Data (AIAA 2004–3345) , 2004 .

[8]  Klaus Hannemann,et al.  The influence and the delay of driver gas contamination in HEG , 2000 .

[9]  H. Tan,et al.  Experimental Investigation of the Unstart Process of a Generic Hypersonic Inlet , 2011 .

[10]  H. Tan,et al.  Experimental Study of the Unstable-Unstarted Condition of a Hypersonic Inlet at Mach 6 , 2007 .

[11]  Saied Emami,et al.  Unsteady pressure behavior in a ramjet/scramjet inlet , 1996 .

[12]  R. Newsome,et al.  Numerical Simulation of Near-Critical and Unsteady, Subcritical Inlet Flow , 1984 .

[13]  E. T. Curran,et al.  Fluid Phenomena in Scramjet Combustion Systems , 1996 .

[14]  Andreas Mack,et al.  CFD Analysis of the HyShot II Scramjet Experiments in the HEG Shock Tunnel , 2008 .

[15]  J. Wagner,et al.  Experimental Investigation of Unstart in an Inlet/Isolator Model in Mach 5 Flow , 2009 .

[16]  T. Gerhold,et al.  Calculation of Complex Three-Dimensional Configurations Employing the DLR-tau-Code , 1997 .

[17]  D. Brüggemann,et al.  An implicit multigrid method for turbulent combustion , 2001 .

[18]  S. Im,et al.  The influence of boundary layers on supersonic inlet flow unstart induced by mass injection , 2011 .

[19]  A. Ferri,et al.  Review of scramjet propulsion technology. , 1968 .

[20]  M. Kodera,et al.  Numerical Investigation of a Detonation Wave System in a Scramjet Combustor , 2012 .

[21]  A. R. Wieting Exploratory study of transient upstart phenomena in a three-dimensional fixed-geometry scramjet engine , 1976 .

[22]  Yoshiaki Miyazato,et al.  Shock train and pseudo-shock phenomena in internal gas flows , 1999 .

[23]  Klaus Hannemann,et al.  Experimental investigation of different scramjet hydrogen injection systems , 2008 .

[25]  R. H. Korkegi,et al.  Comparison of Shock-Induced Two- and Three- Dimensional Incipient Turbulent Seperation , 1975 .

[26]  A. Jameson Time dependent calculations using multigrid, with applications to unsteady flows past airfoils and wings , 1991 .

[27]  Allan Paull,et al.  Boundary-Layer Separation Due to Combustion-Induced Pressure Rise in a Supersonic Flow , 2009 .

[28]  William H. Heiser,et al.  Hypersonic Airbreathing Propulsion , 1994 .

[29]  Klaus Hannemann,et al.  High Enthalpy Flows in the HEG Shock Tunnel: Experiment and Numerical Rebuilding (Invited) , 2003 .

[30]  Sebastian Karl,et al.  Numerical Investigation of a Generic Scramjet Configuration , 2010 .

[31]  Allan Paull,et al.  The Methodology behind the Hyshot Flight Program , 2003 .

[32]  Keith McDaniel,et al.  Three-dimensional simulation of thermal choking in a model scramjet combustor , 2001 .

[33]  G. Settles Schlieren and shadowgraph techniques , 2001 .

[34]  Keith McDaniel,et al.  Simulation of thermal choking in a model scramjet combustor , 1999 .

[35]  Russell R. Boyce,et al.  Comparison of Supersonic Combustion Between Impulse and Vitiation-Heated Facilities , 2000 .

[36]  Takashi Shimura,et al.  LOAD OSCILLATIONS CAUSED BY UNSTART OF HYPERSONIC WIND TUNNELS AND ENGINES , 1998 .