Buried footings in random soils: comparison of limit analysis and finite element analysis

The limit analysis and the finite element method are powerful tools for analysing the bearing capacity of foundations. Previous research mainly focused on the foundations in uniform soils. In realistic conditions, soil properties are always varying spatially due to complex physical, chemical, and biological process in earth evolution. This paper investigates the bearing capacity and failure mechanism of footings buried at various depths in clays with spatially variable distribution of undrained shear strength using the lower bound limit analysis, the upper bound limit analysis, and the finite element analysis. Results show that the bearing capacity increases with increasing buried depths in spatially random soils, which is the same as in the uniform soils. The bearing capacity factors calculated using the finite element method, the lower bound limit analysis, and the upper bound limit analysis for a footing in spatially varied soils are all smaller than the corresponding values in uniform soils. The majority of the bearing capacity factors obtained from the finite element method is bounded by those obtained from the lower bound and the upper bound limit analysis. The shear planes show a clearly unsymmetrical manner in spatially varied soils using the three methods, which is different from the symmetrical shear plane in uniform soils.

[1]  Xiang Ma,et al.  A stabilized stochastic finite element second-order projection method for modeling natural convection in random porous media , 2008, J. Comput. Phys..

[2]  Susan Gourvenec,et al.  Effect of strength non-homogeneity on the shape of failure envelopes for combined loading of strip and circular foundations on clay , 2003 .

[3]  D. V. Griffiths,et al.  Bearing Capacity of Rough Rigid Strip Footing on Cohesive Soil: Probabilistic Study , 2002 .

[4]  Mark Randolph,et al.  Deep-penetrating spudcan foundations on layered clays: centrifuge tests , 2010 .

[5]  Yinghui Tian,et al.  Failure Mechanism and Bearing Capacity of Footings Buried at Various Depths in Spatially Random Soil , 2015 .

[6]  Li Min Zhang,et al.  Geometric parameters and REV of a crack network in soil , 2010 .

[7]  Scott W. Sloan,et al.  Lower bound limit analysis using non‐linear programming , 2002 .

[8]  Donald E. Myers,et al.  Reliability and Statistics in Geotechnical Engineering , 2005, Technometrics.

[9]  K. Phoon,et al.  Characterization of Geotechnical Variability , 1999 .

[10]  Dian-Qing Li,et al.  A multiple response-surface method for slope reliability analysis considering spatial variability of soil properties , 2015 .

[11]  Scott W. Sloan,et al.  Upper bound limit analysis using finite elements and linear programming , 1989 .

[12]  Guy T. Houlsby,et al.  Combined loading of spudcan foundations on clay: numerical modelling , 2001 .

[13]  Yinghui Tian,et al.  Probabilistic combined loading failure envelopes of a strip footing on spatially variable soil , 2013 .

[14]  R. S. Merifield,et al.  Two- and three-dimensional undrained bearing capacity of embedded footings , 2012 .

[15]  Michael A. Hicks,et al.  On the estimation of scale of fluctuation in geostatistics , 2014 .

[16]  Dian-Qing Li,et al.  Efficient System Reliability Analysis of Slope Stability in Spatially Variable Soils Using Monte Carlo Simulation , 2015 .

[17]  Scott W. Sloan,et al.  Upper bound limit analysis using linear finite elements and non‐linear programming , 2001 .

[18]  Thi Minh Hue Le,et al.  Reliability of heterogeneous slopes with cross-correlated shear strength parameters , 2014 .

[19]  Mark Cassidy,et al.  The undrained bearing capacity of a spudcan foundation under combined loading in soft clay , 2011 .

[20]  D. V. Griffiths,et al.  Quantitative risk assessment of landslide by limit analysis and random fields , 2013 .

[21]  Scott W. Sloan,et al.  Lower bound limit analysis using finite elements and linear programming , 1988 .

[22]  Wilson H. Tang,et al.  Probability Concepts in Engineering: Emphasis on Applications to Civil and Environmental Engineering , 2006 .