Partitioned compressive sensing with neighbor-weighted decoding

Compressive sensing has gained momentum in recent years as an exciting new theory in signal processing with several useful applications. It states that signals known to have a sparse representation may be encoded and later reconstructed using a small number of measurements, approximately proportional to the signal's sparsity rather than its size. This paper addresses a critical problem that arises when scaling compressive sensing to signals of large length: that the time required for decoding becomes prohibitively long, and that decoding is not easily parallelized. We describe a method for partitioned compressive sensing, by which we divide a large signal into smaller blocks that may be decoded in parallel. However, since this process requires a significant increase in the number of measurements needed for exact signal reconstruction, we focus on mitigating artifacts that arise due to partitioning in approximately reconstructed signals. Given an error-prone partitioned decoding, we use large magnitude components that are detected with highest accuracy to influence the decoding of neighboring blocks, and call this approach neighbor-weighted decoding. We show that, for applications with a predefined error threshold, our method can be used in conjunction with partitioned compressive sensing to improve decoding speed, requiring fewer additional measurements than unweighted or locally-weighted decoding.

[1]  Lu Gan Block Compressed Sensing of Natural Images , 2007, 2007 15th International Conference on Digital Signal Processing.

[2]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Enhancing Sparsity by Reweighted ℓ1 Minimization , 2007, 0711.1612.

[3]  H. T. Kung,et al.  DISTROY: Detecting Integrated Circuit Trojans with Compressive Measurements , 2011, HotSec.

[4]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[5]  Michael B. Wakin,et al.  The Restricted Isometry Property for block diagonal matrices , 2011, 2011 45th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems.

[6]  E.J. Candes Compressive Sampling , 2022 .

[7]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  Near-Optimal Signal Recovery From Random Projections: Universal Encoding Strategies? , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[8]  H. T. Kung,et al.  CloudSense: Continuous Fine-Grain Cloud Monitoring with Compressive Sensing , 2011, HotCloud.

[9]  Emmanuel J. Cand The Restricted Isometry Property and Its Implications for Compressed Sensing , 2008 .

[10]  Piotr Indyk,et al.  Sparse Recovery Using Sparse Matrices , 2010, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[11]  Audra E. Kosh,et al.  Linear Algebra and its Applications , 1992 .

[12]  M. Wakin,et al.  Concentration of Measure for Block Diagonal Matrices with Applications to Compressive Sensing , 2010 .

[13]  L. Rudin,et al.  Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms , 1992 .

[14]  Sachin Katti,et al.  Embracing wireless interference: analog network coding , 2007, SIGCOMM '07.

[15]  E. Candès The restricted isometry property and its implications for compressed sensing , 2008 .

[16]  Jun Sun,et al.  Compressive data gathering for large-scale wireless sensor networks , 2009, MobiCom '09.

[17]  Joel A. Tropp,et al.  Signal Recovery From Random Measurements Via Orthogonal Matching Pursuit , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[18]  Bruce W. Suter,et al.  Measurement combining and progressive reconstruction in compressive sensing , 2011, 2011 - MILCOM 2011 Military Communications Conference.

[19]  H. T. Kung,et al.  Collaborative compressive spectrum sensing in a UAV environment , 2011, 2011 - MILCOM 2011 Military Communications Conference.

[20]  Henrique S. Malvar,et al.  Signal processing with lapped transforms , 1992 .

[21]  Michael B. Wakin,et al.  Concentration of Measure for Block Diagonal Matrices With Applications to Compressive Signal Processing , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[22]  Deanna Needell,et al.  CoSaMP: Iterative signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate samples , 2008, ArXiv.

[23]  E. Candès,et al.  Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements , 2005, math/0503066.

[24]  D. Donoho,et al.  Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.