Precision of estimates of mean and peak spinal loads in lifting.

A bootstrap procedure was used to determine the statistical precision of estimates of mean and peak spinal loads during lifting as function of the numbers of subjects and measurements per subject included in a biomechanical study. Data were derived from an experiment in which 10 subjects performed 360 lifting trials each. The maximum values per lift of the lumbar flexion angle, L5S1 sagittal plane moment, and L5S1 compression force were determined. From the data set thus compiled, 3000 samples were randomly drawn for each combination of number of subjects and number of measurements considered. The coefficients of variation of mean and peak (defined as mean plus 2 standard deviations) spinal loads across these samples were calculated. The coefficients of variation of the means of the three parameters of spinal load decreased as a linear function of the number of subjects to a power of about -0.48 and number of measurements to a power of about -0.06, while the corresponding powers for peak loads were about -0.44 and -0.11.

[1]  M P de Looze,et al.  Mechanisms of Action of Lumbar Supports: A Systematic Review , 2000, Spine.

[2]  Monique H. W. Frings-Dresen,et al.  Epidemiologic evidence on manual materials handling as a risk factor for back disorders:a systematic review , 1999 .

[3]  W. E. Hoogendoorn,et al.  Physical load during work and leisure time as risk factors for back pain. , 1999, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[4]  J H van Dieën,et al.  Fractures of the lumbar vertebral endplate in the etiology of low back pain: a hypothesis on the causative role of spinal compression in aspecific low back pain. , 1999, Medical hypotheses.

[5]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  Bootstrap Methods for Standard Errors, Confidence Intervals, and Other Measures of Statistical Accuracy , 1986 .

[6]  A. Burdorf,et al.  Positive and negative evidence of risk factors for back disorders. , 1997, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[7]  W. Marras,et al.  Variation in spinal load and trunk dynamics during repeated lifting exertions. , 1999, Clinical biomechanics.

[8]  Adams Ma,et al.  Prolapsed Intervertebral Disc: A Hyperflexion Injury , 1982 .

[9]  J. Kelsey,et al.  An epidemiologic study of lifting and twisting on the job and risk for acute prolapsed lumbar intervertebral disc , 1984, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[10]  A H Briggs,et al.  Pulling cost-effectiveness analysis up by its bootstraps: a non-parametric approach to confidence interval estimation. , 1997, Health economics.

[11]  M. Adams,et al.  Tensile properties of the annulus fibrosus , 1993, European Spine Journal.

[12]  J H van Dieën,et al.  Stoop or squat: a review of biomechanical studies on lifting technique. , 1999, Clinical biomechanics.

[13]  W S Marras,et al.  The effects of motion on trunk biomechanics. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.

[14]  J H van Dieën,et al.  Coordination of the leg muscles in backlift and leglift. , 1992, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  Jaap H. van Dieën,et al.  Sensitivity of single-equivalent trunk extensor muscle models to anatomical and functional assumptions. , 1999 .

[16]  Huub M. Toussaint,et al.  Within-Subject Variability in Low Back Load in a Repetitively Performed, Mildly Constrained Lifting Task , 2001, Spine.