Can a combination of average of normals and “real time” External Quality Assurance replace Internal Quality Control?

Abstract Internal Quality Control and External Quality Assurance are separate but related processes that have developed independently in laboratory medicine over many years. They have different sample frequencies, statistical interpretations and immediacy. Both processes have evolved absorbing new understandings of the concept of laboratory error, sample material matrix and assay capability. However, we do not believe at the coalface that either process has led to much improvement in patient outcomes recently. It is the increasing reliability and automation of analytical platforms along with improved stability of reagents that has reduced systematic and random error, which in turn has minimised the risk of running less frequent IQC. We suggest that it is time to rethink the role of both these processes and unite them into a single approach using an Average of Normals model supported by more frequent External Quality Assurance samples. This new paradigm may lead to less confusion for laboratory staff and quicker responses to and identification of out of control situations.

[1]  C. Sturgeon.  External quality assessment of hormone determinations. , 2013, Best practice & research. Clinical endocrinology & metabolism.

[2]  Sten A Westgard,et al.  The quality of laboratory testing today: an assessment of sigma metrics for analytic quality using performance data from proficiency testing surveys and the CLIA criteria for acceptable performance. , 2006, American journal of clinical pathology.

[3]  Mark Mackay,et al.  Collective Opinion Paper on a 2013 AACB Workshop of Experts seeking Harmonisation of Approaches to Setting a Laboratory Quality Control Policy. , 2015, The Clinical biochemist. Reviews.

[4]  Robert Rej,et al.  Assessing analytical accuracy through proficiency testing: have effects of matrix been overstated? , 2015, Clinical chemistry.

[5]  Chin Hon Tan,et al.  Moving sum of number of positive patient result as a quality control tool , 2017, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[6]  Tony Badrick,et al.  A simple matrix of analytical performance to identify assays that risk patients using External Quality Assurance Program data. , 2016, Clinical biochemistry.

[7]  Curtis A Parvin,et al.  Assessing the impact of the frequency of quality control testing on the quality of reported patient results. , 2008, Clinical chemistry.

[8]  P J Howanitz,et al.  Clinical laboratory quality control: a costly process now out of control. , 1997, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[9]  Mark A Cervinski,et al.  Optimization of a Moving Averages Program Using a Simulated Annealing Algorithm: The Goal is to Monitor the Process Not the Patients. , 2016, Clinical chemistry.

[10]  Cas Weykamp,et al.  Proficiency testing/external quality assessment: current challenges and future directions. , 2011, Clinical chemistry.

[11]  Joseph Litten,et al.  Applying Sigma Metrics to Reduce Outliers. , 2017, Clinics in laboratory medicine.

[12]  R. Cartier,et al.  Uncertainty in measurement for 43 biochemistry, immunoassay, and hemostasis routine analytes evaluated by a method using only external quality assessment data , 2015, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[13]  Chin Hon Tan,et al.  Detecting long-term drift in reagent lots. , 2015, Clinical chemistry.

[14]  Alexander Katayev,et al.  Changing the paradigm of laboratory quality control through implementation of real-time test results monitoring: For patients by patients. , 2015, Clinical biochemistry.

[15]  W Greg Miller,et al.  Specimen materials, target values and commutability for external quality assessment (proficiency testing) schemes. , 2003, Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry.

[16]  Renze Bais.  Use of Capability Index to improve laboratory analytical performance. , 2008, The Clinical biochemist. Reviews.

[17]  Chin Hon Tan,et al.  Verification of out-of-control situations detected by "average of normal" approach. , 2016, Clinical biochemistry.

[18]  Stephen R Master,et al.  "Big Data" in Laboratory Medicine. , 2015, Clinical chemistry.

[19]  Dietmar Stöckl,et al.  The Empower project – a new way of assessing and monitoring test comparability and stability , 2015, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.