Digital Green: Participatory video for agricultural extension

Digital green is a research project that seeks to disseminate targeted agricultural information to small and marginal farmers in India using digital video. The unique components of digital green are (1) a participatory process for content production, (2) a locally generated digital video database, (3) human-mediated instruction for dissemination and training, and (4) regimented sequencing to initiate a new community. Unlike some systems that expect information or communication technology alone to deliver useful knowledge to marginal farmers, digital green works with existing, people-based extension systems and aims to amplify their effectiveness. While video provides a point of focus, it is people and social dynamics that ultimately make digital green work. Local social networks are tapped to connect farmers with experts; the thrill of appearing "on TV" motivates farmers; and homophily is exploited to minimize the distance between teacher and learner. In a four-month trial involving 16 villages (1070 households), digital green was seen to increase adoption of certain agriculture practices by a factor of six to seven times over classical person-only agriculture extension. The hardware investment was a TV and a DVD-player per village, and one digital camera and PC shared among all 16 villages. These results are very preliminary, but promising.

[1]  Glenn Davis Stone,et al.  Agricultural Deskilling and the Spread of Genetically Modified Cotton in Warangal , 2007, Current Anthropology.

[2]  Anthony Willett,et al.  Agricultural Extension: Generic Challenges and Some Ingredients for Solutions , 1999 .

[3]  David Zilberman,et al.  Knowledge generation and technical change : institutional innovation in agriculture , 2001 .

[4]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[5]  S. Bailur.  Review of Research on Rural PC Kiosks , 2007 .

[6]  J F Gibbons,et al.  Tutored videotape instruction: a new use of electronics media in education. , 1977, Science.

[7]  Richa Kumar,et al.  eChoupals: A Study on the Financial Sustainability of Village Internet Centers in Rural Madhya Pradesh , 2004 .

[8]  P. Krishna Reddy,et al.  eSagu 1 : An IT based personalized agricultural extension system prototype - analysis of 51 Farmers' case studies , 2006 .

[9]  H. Berg,et al.  Investing in Farmers--The Impacts of Farmer Field Schools in Relation to Integrated Pest Management , 2007 .

[10]  Subhasri Duttagupta,et al.  aAqua: a database-backended multilingual, multimedia community forum , 2006, SIGMOD Conference.

[11]  Robert Tripp,et al.  What should we expect from farmer field schools? A Sri Lanka case study , 2005 .

[12]  Agnes C. Rola,et al.  Do Farmer Field School Graduates Retain and Share What They Learn? An Investigation in Iloilo, Philippines , 2002 .

[13]  Lou E. Riesenberg,et al.  Farmers' preferences for methods of receiving information on new or innovative farming practices , 1989 .

[14]  Jock R. Anderson,et al.  The Rise and Fall of Training and Visit Extension: An Asian Mini-Drama with an African Epilogue , 2006 .

[15]  Burton E. Swanson,et al.  Improving agricultural extension A reference manual , 1997 .

[16]  Matthew Kam,et al.  The Digital StudyHall , 2005 .

[17]  Richard J. Anderson,et al.  Experiences with tutored video instruction for introductory programming courses , 2001, SIGCSE '01.

[18]  Carl K. Eicher,et al.  Agricultural extension in the twenty-first century. , 1998 .

[19]  Nitin Garg,et al.  Digital Networking Going Postal and a Tale of Three Schools , 2006 .

[20]  Aneel G. Karnani,et al.  Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid: A Mirage , 2006 .