Spatial distribution of biopsy cores and the detection of intra-lesion pathologic heterogeneity
暂无分享,去创建一个
Christopher G. Roth | Anne E. Calvaresi | D. Mitchell | C. Lallas | E. Trabulsi | P. McCue | S. Deshmukh | K. Hookim | B. Calio | P. Mccue
[1] Inderbir S. Gill,et al. Prostate evaluation for clinically important disease: Sampling using image-guidance or not? (The PRECISION study, NCT02380027) , 2018 .
[2] M. Ratain,et al. Genomic Heterogeneity Within Individual Prostate Cancer Foci Impacts Predictive Biomarkers of Targeted Therapy. , 2018, European urology focus.
[3] A. Sidana,et al. Risk of Upgrading from Prostate Biopsy to Radical Prostatectomy Pathology—Does Saturation Biopsy of Index Lesion during Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging‐Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy Help? , 2017, The Journal of urology.
[4] P Choyke,et al. Changes in prostate cancer detection rate of MRI-TRUS fusion vs systematic biopsy over time: evidence of a learning curve , 2017, Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases.
[5] G. Cattaneo,et al. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance/Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy: Number and Spatial Distribution of Cores for Better Index Tumor Detection and Characterization , 2017, The Journal of urology.
[6] A. Sidana,et al. Missing the Mark: Prostate Cancer Upgrading by Systematic Biopsy over Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy , 2017, The Journal of urology.
[7] Shyam Natarajan,et al. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Underestimation of Prostate Cancer Geometry: Use of Patient Specific Molds to Correlate Images with Whole Mount Pathology , 2017, The Journal of urology.
[8] B. Hadaschik,et al. Transcriptome Wide Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy and Matching Surgical Specimens from High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Radical Prostatectomy: The Target Must Be Hit. , 2017, European urology focus.
[9] M. Kamrava,et al. Targeted Prostate Biopsy Gleason Score Heterogeneity and Implications for Risk Stratification , 2016, American journal of clinical oncology.
[10] R. Gabe,et al. PROMIS — Prostate MR imaging study: A paired validating cohort study evaluating the role of multi-parametric MRI in men with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer☆ , 2015, Contemporary clinical trials.
[11] Baris Turkbey,et al. Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. , 2015, JAMA.
[12] Andrew B Rosenkrantz,et al. Optimization of prostate biopsy: the role of magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy in detection, localization and risk assessment. , 2014, The Journal of urology.
[13] S. Fosså,et al. Concordance between Gleason scores of needle biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens: a population‐based study , 2009, BJU international.
[14] K. Chrouser,et al. Extended and saturation needle biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer , 2004 .
[15] C. Sundaram,et al. Biopsy Gleason score: how does it correlate with the final pathological diagnosis in prostate cancer? , 1997, British journal of urology.
[16] P. Pepe,et al. Erectile dysfunction in 1050 men following extended (18 cores) vs saturation (28 cores) vs saturation plus MRI-targeted prostate biopsy (32 cores) , 2016, International Journal of Impotence Research.
[17] Shyam Natarajan,et al. Targeted biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer using an office based magnetic resonance ultrasound fusion device. , 2013, The Journal of urology.
[18] T. Wheeler,et al. Heterogeneity of prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens. , 1994, Urology.